DOAP format question

[Hervé BOUTEMY]

Hi,

I'm working on http://projects-new.apache.org/ , which makes me dig into ASF 
DOAP conventions

And I found something that I think is a bug: on 
http://projects.apache.org/docs/pmc.html , half of the page explains about 
asfext:PMC in uppercase, while the other half is about asfext:pmc in lowercase

AFAIK, everybody is using asfext:pmc, in lowercase

Can you confirm that it is in lowercase? Then fix the page, that is causing a 
little bit of confusion?

Thanks in advance,

Hervé

Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016

[Krzysztof Sobkowiak]

Hi

I prefer the migration to Github too. It's currently the most popular hosting 
for projects. For binaries I would prefer
the Maven Central, but each project can make own decision where the binaries 
should be deployed.

Regards
Krzysztof

On 19.03.2015 12:22, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> +1 for GitHub  - as Apache Extras are easily mini-communities of one
> or two people and not as clear way in to contribute.
>
>
> GitHub should seriously be considered. Making an apache-extras
> organization there should be straight forward.
>
> As for binaries - I found it very useful to use BinTray for Beanshell
> - as I could do both Maven and regular downloads:
>
> https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/beanshell/wiki/Download
>
> On 12 March 2015 at 21:49, Christopher  wrote:
>> I don't know the reasons for choosing SF, but I'd highly recommend
>> putting serious consideration into GitHub. It's quite pleasant to work
>> with, and although I'm not a part of the apache-extras, I think those
>> who are would be quite satisfied with it (that's just my personal
>> opinion, of course).
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:37 PM, David Nalley  wrote:
>>> It is my understanding that moving to SF from Google Code is a ComDev
>>> decision. I have interacted with SF and then brought the PoCs they've
>>> done here, but AFAIK, no decision has been made.
>>>
>>> --David
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
>>>  wrote:
 Ahhh... I see no that's just code for I don't have time, but these folks 
 have shown interest ;-)

 I'm happy to help make sure we hit this deadline, but I'm not driving it.

 Ross

 -Original Message-
 From: Ulrich Stärk [mailto:u...@spielviel.de]
 Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 1:50 PM
 To: dev@community.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016

 *Really* moving board@ to BCC ;)

 You said you put people in contact with each other so I was under the 
 impression you were actively part of a group driving this.

 Jim, do you have any updates on the current status?

 Cheers,

 Uli

 On 2015-03-12 21:40, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> Moving board@ to BCC
>
> I am *not* working on it. I have no idea who said I was (I do hope it
> wasn't me!)
>
> All I know is that Jim, David and Roberto are working on it, I don't
> know how actively but it is now a priority.
>
> I believe Jim is involved wearing his ComDev hat so (with his
> agreement) you can look to him for those updates. David is wearing his 
> infra hat and Roberto wears his SF hat.
>
> Ross
>
> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft
> Corporation
>
> -Original Message- From: Ulrich Stärk
> [mailto:u...@spielviel.de] Sent: Thursday, March 12,
> 2015 1:36 PM To: dev@community.apache.org Cc: bo...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
>
> We reported about apache extras in September and November and both
> times we were told that Jim, Ross, David and Roberto were working on
> it. Some time in October David asked for feedback on a proof of concept, 
> no news since then.
>
> Can you shed some light on who is driving this atm?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Uli
>
> On 2015-03-12 21:22, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
>> Today Google announced that Google Code will be shutting down Jan 25, 
>> 2016.
>>
>> We need to create a replacement for Apache-extras. Can we please make
>> sure that progress on this is reported in the ComDev board report each 
>> quarter.
>>
>> I suggest the starting point should be to expand discussions with
>> SourceForge, they have offered neighborhoods in the past. David, with
>> his infra hat, has been exploring options for download provision already 
>> (I'm not sure of the current status).
>>
>> (and as a reminder, this is why we don't like to use services
>> provided by external companies)
>>
>> Ross
>>
>> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft
>> Corporation
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect
Apache Software Foundation Member
Apache ServiceMix  Committer & PMC chair
Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC