Re: Cordova has a Blog/News! && Announce 3.0?
Contents about 3.0 looks awsome but Minor thing the content its swap, it will mess up the permalinks The contents of 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md goes in 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md The contents of 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md goes in 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md --Carlos On Thursday, July 18, 2013, Brian LeRoux wrote: > Fuck, its here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/ > > svn. I tell ya. > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Brian LeRoux > > wrote: > > Pls review all: > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Anis KADRI > > > > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Joe Bowser > >> > > wrote: > >> > >>> The CLI treats the platform code as a build artifact. While this is > >>> the goal, the reality is that people modify the code, and people rely > >>> on old plugins. There will be users who NEVER use the CLI because of > >>> this fact, and will need to use plugman. Just because you want to > >>> have people use the software in a particular way doesn't mean that > >>> they will, and we should provide some support for people who want to > >>> not use the CLI. I don't use the CLI, because I actually work with > >>> the platform source on a regular basis and I don't want to constantly > >>> destroy and rebuild the project that I hooked the framework source to. > >>> > >>> I know that people will say that I'm a special case, but the bug > >>> tracker says otherwise. Also, we have CordovaWebView, which is a > >>> component that isn't even supported with the CLI flow. Just because > >>> the CLI is the new hawtness doesn't mean that we should neglect > >>> everyone who chooses to actually hack Cordova into something they > >>> want. > >>> > >> > >> +1 > -- Carlos Santana
Website work
When updating the site, please consider CB-3560 as it pertains to ASF policy. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3560
Re: Support for certificate pinning
I can talk to you about that and it's big brother mutual authentication anytime :) Not sure if it's solvable properly in Cordova though… :/ On 18/07/2013, at 2:59 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3498 > > > I'm going through issues in JIRA that don't have a component assigned to > them and stumbled upon the above issue. > > Feature request for "certificate pinning". Valid? Close it? Thoughts? I > dunno what it is heh >
Re: Plugin loading times - Android
This reminds me of a recent experiment Google+ team did for performance, and they replaced all CSS loads from XHR with tags and god a big perf boost to load times. Seems its best to let the browser do what it does best. -Michal On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Shazron wrote: > On a related note, there is a plugin loading time (iOS native) timing > reports, only for startup plugins though: > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/blob/c24b6e3ac8f4240f75921142fd9d4f6b6d1a50d7/CordovaLib/Classes/CDVViewController.m#L364-L374 > > Implemented for this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2587 > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Filip Maj wrote: > > > Yep, Andrew's summary sounds about right. > > > > Interesting that XHR vs. script tag injection leads to such differences. > > > > I would be interested to see these same tests run on iOS, BB10, WP7+8 > > devices. > > > > David did you happen to automate these steps somehow ? I wouldn't mind > > running these tests on other devices/platforms that I have handy. > > > > On 7/15/13 9:08 AM, "Andrew Grieve" wrote: > > > > >Thanks for looking into this David! > > > > > >To summarize your results - it looks like: > > >a) For some reason moving the script tag being injected instead of using > > >an > > >XHR made loading faster > > >b) Having all plugin files being loaded separately *is* slowing our > > >start-up time down, but not by enough that it's an urgent issue. > > > > > > > > >On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, David Kemp wrote: > > > > > >> The following are obtained by running the mobilespec suite - all tests > > >> The tests were run on a physical nexus 7 > > >> > > >> Summary: > > >> * on Android , removing the xhr trims off about 250ms on load of > > >> mobilespec. > > >> * the multi-file plugin loading takes about 1.6 times as long as a > > >>single > > >> file > > >> > > >> Details > > >> In each case below: > > >> * the first log line is written immediately on load. > > >> * the second line is written when you press 'Automatic Test' > > >> * the third line is written when you press 'Run All Tests' > > >> The times are different because of caching that takes place, so the > > >>first > > >> one is most interesting. > > >> > > >> Case 1: This case is manually constructed, lumping all plugin js files > > >> together. > > >> With plugins loaded in a single file + cordova_plugins.js(no xhr): > > >> - plugin loading took 211ms > > >> - plugin loading took 56ms > > >> - plugin loading took 83ms > > >> > > >> Case 2: This case is what the 3.0 version did until: > > >> CB-4016 / > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;h=0ce4718 > > >> With plugins loaded separately (about 60 files): > > >> - plugin loading took 598ms > > >> - plugin loading took 124ms > > >> - plugin loading took 279ms > > >> > > >> Case 3: This case is what the 3.0 version does after: > > >> CB-4016 / > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;h=0ce4718 > > >> With plugins loaded separately *withou*t xhr (about 60 files): > > >> - plugin loading took 336ms > > >> - plugin loading took 112ms > > >> - plugin loading took 260ms > > >> > > > > >
Support for certificate pinning
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3498 I'm going through issues in JIRA that don't have a component assigned to them and stumbled upon the above issue. Feature request for "certificate pinning". Valid? Close it? Thoughts? I dunno what it is heh
Re: help w/ the new cordova.io site/blawg thing
oh, I added the less gem to the gemfile and it all worked half of dozen of one / six of another I gues On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Carlos Santana wrote: > lessc get's called from bin/gen.rb when running "Rake build" > > system( "lessc www/css/_master.less > public/css/master.css" ) > > Need to install lessc I did it with npm > > npm install -g less > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > >> think it was a missing ref to less in the gemfile --- >> brian.ler...@gmail.com at any rate =) >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Carlos Santana >> wrote: >> > blawg what? >> > I can try to help >> > >> > lets gtalk or +hangout >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >> > >> >> does anyone else experience this? >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Carlos Santana >> > >> > > > > -- > Carlos Santana >
Re: 3.0.0 Final
\o/ On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Lorin Beer wrote: > rock > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Steven Gill wrote: > >> Lets do the final tag for 3.0.0. Issue at >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4294 >>
Re: Cordova has a Blog/News! && Announce 3.0?
Fuck, its here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/ svn. I tell ya. On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > Pls review all: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Anis KADRI wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: >> >>> The CLI treats the platform code as a build artifact. While this is >>> the goal, the reality is that people modify the code, and people rely >>> on old plugins. There will be users who NEVER use the CLI because of >>> this fact, and will need to use plugman. Just because you want to >>> have people use the software in a particular way doesn't mean that >>> they will, and we should provide some support for people who want to >>> not use the CLI. I don't use the CLI, because I actually work with >>> the platform source on a regular basis and I don't want to constantly >>> destroy and rebuild the project that I hooked the framework source to. >>> >>> I know that people will say that I'm a special case, but the bug >>> tracker says otherwise. Also, we have CordovaWebView, which is a >>> component that isn't even supported with the CLI flow. Just because >>> the CLI is the new hawtness doesn't mean that we should neglect >>> everyone who chooses to actually hack Cordova into something they >>> want. >>> >> >> +1
Re: Cordova has a Blog/News! && Announce 3.0?
Pls review all: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Anis KADRI wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > >> The CLI treats the platform code as a build artifact. While this is >> the goal, the reality is that people modify the code, and people rely >> on old plugins. There will be users who NEVER use the CLI because of >> this fact, and will need to use plugman. Just because you want to >> have people use the software in a particular way doesn't mean that >> they will, and we should provide some support for people who want to >> not use the CLI. I don't use the CLI, because I actually work with >> the platform source on a regular basis and I don't want to constantly >> destroy and rebuild the project that I hooked the framework source to. >> >> I know that people will say that I'm a special case, but the bug >> tracker says otherwise. Also, we have CordovaWebView, which is a >> component that isn't even supported with the CLI flow. Just because >> the CLI is the new hawtness doesn't mean that we should neglect >> everyone who chooses to actually hack Cordova into something they >> want. >> > > +1
Review Request 12742: Cordova 3 announcement blawg post
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12742/ --- Review request for cordova, Andrew Grieve, Fil Maj, Michal Mocny, and Michael Brooks. Repository: cordova-site Description --- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md Diffs - Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12742/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Brian LeRoux
Re: 3.0.0 Final
rock On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Steven Gill wrote: > Lets do the final tag for 3.0.0. Issue at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4294 >
3.0.0 Final
Lets do the final tag for 3.0.0. Issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4294
Re: help w/ the new cordova.io site/blawg thing
Yes I know, suddenly I have a thing for using npm and cli for everything ;-p On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Carlos Santana wrote: > lessc get's called from bin/gen.rb when running "Rake build" > > system( "lessc www/css/_master.less > public/css/master.css" ) > > Need to install lessc I did it with npm > > npm install -g less > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > >> think it was a missing ref to less in the gemfile --- >> brian.ler...@gmail.com at any rate =) >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Carlos Santana >> wrote: >> > blawg what? >> > I can try to help >> > >> > lets gtalk or +hangout >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >> > >> >> does anyone else experience this? >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Carlos Santana >> > >> > > > > -- > Carlos Santana > > -- Carlos Santana
Re: help w/ the new cordova.io site/blawg thing
lessc get's called from bin/gen.rb when running "Rake build" system( "lessc www/css/_master.less > public/css/master.css" ) Need to install lessc I did it with npm npm install -g less On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > think it was a missing ref to less in the gemfile --- > brian.ler...@gmail.com at any rate =) > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Carlos Santana > wrote: > > blawg what? > > I can try to help > > > > lets gtalk or +hangout > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > > > >> does anyone else experience this? > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Santana > > > -- Carlos Santana
Re: help w/ the new cordova.io site/blawg thing
think it was a missing ref to less in the gemfile --- brian.ler...@gmail.com at any rate =) On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Carlos Santana wrote: > blawg what? > I can try to help > > lets gtalk or +hangout > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > >> does anyone else experience this? >> > > > > -- > Carlos Santana >
Re: help w/ the new cordova.io site/blawg thing
blawg what? I can try to help lets gtalk or +hangout On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > does anyone else experience this? > -- Carlos Santana
help w/ the new cordova.io site/blawg thing
does anyone else experience this?
Re: Tagging Plugins
I there wasn't the time to properly test Windows 8, then I like the idea of not including it in the release. It can just be included in the next one. It's easy to not include it - we just don't tag it and we don't include a .zip of it in our apache dist. On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Shazron wrote: > The source is going to be released anyway though - so maybe bump up the > version? OS X didn't have any (significant) changes but I bumped it up > anyway > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Jesse MacFadyen > wrote: > > > I haven't had the cycles to put towards Windows 8, so I think it > > should not be included in the 3.0.0 release. There is no plugman > > support, and limited CLI tooling currently. > > > > Cheers, > > Jesse > > > > Sent from my iPhone5 > > > > On Jul 17, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > > > > We are waiting for the upgrade guides to be finished before can tag docs, > > and waiting on Windows 8 repo to be tagged. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4208 > > > > > > > On 7/17/13 12:39 PM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Steven Gill > > > wrote: > > >> If you believe android 3.0 is ready for final (and no objections from > > >> others) I say tag it today. > > >>> On Jul 17, 2013 12:14 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I would prefer to tag today. I'll be in a car driving to PDX for > most > > >>> of tomorrow and will most likely unable to tag until late afternoon. > > >>> > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > > Awesome, thanks Steve. I'm thinking we tag 3 proper tmrw for > > everything. (Pending group consensus of course.) > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Steven Gill > > >>> > > >>> wrote: > > > All plugins have been tagged 3.0.0rc1. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Steven Gill > > >>> > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >> `./coho tag-release --version 3.0.0rc1 -r plugins` doesn't work > > >>> due to > > >>> the > > >> lack of release branchs for plugins! no. Manually > > >>> tagging! > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Steven Gill > > >>> > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Yup. I want to be able to test using the tag. Also finish off the > > >>> RC > > >>> to > > >>> see how the release package looks and figure out what we want to > > >>> change (if > > >>> anything) for 3.0 final. > > >>> > > >>> I will tag it shortly. > > >>> On Jul 16, 2013 7:44 PM, "Andrew Grieve" > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > I think this is a good idea. Would be good to be able to test > > >>> "cordova > > plugin add URL_TO_PLUGIN@3.0.0rc1". (maybe that's what you > meant > > >>> Steve) > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Steven Gill < > > >>> stevengil...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > How about I do a mass 3.0.0rc1 tag on them and then for 3.0.0 > > >>> tag > > >>> we > > make > > > sure to get the fully working file & file transfer. I want to > > >>> update > > all of > > > the readmes for the plugins pointing to the coreplugininstall > > >>> guide > > still > > > (once we figure out what directory to host it and the link for > > >>> it). > > > > > > -Steve > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Jesse > > >>> > > wrote: > > > > > >> It might not even be today, but it will be before Friday. > > >> Can you tag the rest? > > >> > > >> @purplecabbage > > >> risingj.com > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Steven Gill < > > >>> stevengil...@gmail.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Waiting on the OK from Jesse for windows and then we are > > >>> good > > >>> to > > tag > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Bryan Higgins < > > br...@bryanhiggins.net > > wrote: > > >>> > > The bb plugins should be good to go. > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Andrew Grieve < > > agri...@chromium.org > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > iOS and Android are good on the plugin front I > > >>> believe. I > > >>> see > > there > > >>> still > > > active BB commits going in though. Status of these? > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Brian LeRoux > > >>> > > wrote: > > > > > >> go go go > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Gill < > > >> stevengil...@gmail.com > > > > >> wrote: > > >>> Any blockers o
Re: Tagging Plugins
The source is going to be released anyway though - so maybe bump up the version? OS X didn't have any (significant) changes but I bumped it up anyway On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Jesse MacFadyen wrote: > I haven't had the cycles to put towards Windows 8, so I think it > should not be included in the 3.0.0 release. There is no plugman > support, and limited CLI tooling currently. > > Cheers, > Jesse > > Sent from my iPhone5 > > On Jul 17, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > > We are waiting for the upgrade guides to be finished before can tag docs, > and waiting on Windows 8 repo to be tagged. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4208 > > > > On 7/17/13 12:39 PM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Steven Gill > > wrote: > >> If you believe android 3.0 is ready for final (and no objections from > >> others) I say tag it today. > >>> On Jul 17, 2013 12:14 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > >>> > >>> I would prefer to tag today. I'll be in a car driving to PDX for most > >>> of tomorrow and will most likely unable to tag until late afternoon. > >>> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > Awesome, thanks Steve. I'm thinking we tag 3 proper tmrw for > everything. (Pending group consensus of course.) > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Steven Gill > >>> > >>> wrote: > > All plugins have been tagged 3.0.0rc1. > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Steven Gill > >>> > >>> wrote: > > > >> `./coho tag-release --version 3.0.0rc1 -r plugins` doesn't work > >>> due to > >>> the > >> lack of release branchs for plugins! no. Manually > >>> tagging! > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Steven Gill > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> Yup. I want to be able to test using the tag. Also finish off the > >>> RC > >>> to > >>> see how the release package looks and figure out what we want to > >>> change (if > >>> anything) for 3.0 final. > >>> > >>> I will tag it shortly. > >>> On Jul 16, 2013 7:44 PM, "Andrew Grieve" > >>> wrote: > >>> > I think this is a good idea. Would be good to be able to test > >>> "cordova > plugin add URL_TO_PLUGIN@3.0.0rc1". (maybe that's what you meant > >>> Steve) > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Steven Gill < > >>> stevengil...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > How about I do a mass 3.0.0rc1 tag on them and then for 3.0.0 > >>> tag > >>> we > make > > sure to get the fully working file & file transfer. I want to > >>> update > all of > > the readmes for the plugins pointing to the coreplugininstall > >>> guide > still > > (once we figure out what directory to host it and the link for > >>> it). > > > > -Steve > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Jesse > >>> > wrote: > > > >> It might not even be today, but it will be before Friday. > >> Can you tag the rest? > >> > >> @purplecabbage > >> risingj.com > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Steven Gill < > >>> stevengil...@gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Waiting on the OK from Jesse for windows and then we are > >>> good > >>> to > tag > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Bryan Higgins < > br...@bryanhiggins.net > wrote: > >>> > The bb plugins should be good to go. > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Andrew Grieve < > agri...@chromium.org > >> > wrote: > > > iOS and Android are good on the plugin front I > >>> believe. I > >>> see > there > >>> still > > active BB commits going in though. Status of these? > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Brian LeRoux > >>> > wrote: > > > >> go go go > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Gill < > >> stevengil...@gmail.com > > >> wrote: > >>> Any blockers on me mass tagging the plugins? >
