[jira] [Commented] (RAT-150) RAT should use Apache Tika to simply guess ignored [application/X] file types and focus on the [text/Y] family as a sensible default

2013-08-29 Thread Chris A. Mattmann (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13753677#comment-13753677
 ] 

Chris A. Mattmann commented on RAT-150:
---

Agree, will support this in a back compat way. I'm working on a patch for your 
guys review. Do you use Review Board?

> RAT should use Apache Tika to simply guess ignored [application/X] file types 
> and focus on the [text/Y] family as a sensible default
> 
>
> Key: RAT-150
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-150
> Project: Apache Rat
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: mime-meta-data, scan
>Affects Versions: 0.8
>Reporter: Chris A. Mattmann
>
> RAT could use Apache Tika to automatically guess file types, obviating the 
> need to specify an explicit white list or black list.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Commented] (RAT-98) Maven RAT report does not document skipped files

2013-08-29 Thread Sebb (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13753493#comment-13753493
 ] 

Sebb commented on RAT-98:
-

It would be helpful to show the active include and exclude configuration on the 
report as well; this should be after any defaults have been applied. [The 
defaults may change between releases, so it is helpful to have the active 
settings documented.]

For excludes of directory trees, it probably does not make sense to list 
individual files (there will generally be too many).
It's really only for the more specific excludes where the file names might be 
useful - the exclude may be too general.

> Maven RAT report does not document skipped files
> 
>
> Key: RAT-98
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-98
> Project: Apache Rat
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Sebb
>
> The Maven RAT report should document which files have been skipped using the 
>  option.
> Either by listing the configuration details, or better by listing the file 
> names with a marker, e.g. EX to show they were deliberately skipped.
> Note: this only refers to files listed in  entries, not files which 
> are excluded by default.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Commented] (RAT-150) RAT should use Apache Tika to simply guess ignored [application/X] file types and focus on the [text/Y] family as a sensible default

2013-08-29 Thread Sebb (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13753490#comment-13753490
 ] 

Sebb commented on RAT-150:
--

Although for compatibility (and perhaps performance?) such lists should 
continue to be supported.

> RAT should use Apache Tika to simply guess ignored [application/X] file types 
> and focus on the [text/Y] family as a sensible default
> 
>
> Key: RAT-150
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-150
> Project: Apache Rat
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: mime-meta-data, scan
>Affects Versions: 0.8
>Reporter: Chris A. Mattmann
>
> RAT could use Apache Tika to automatically guess file types, obviating the 
> need to specify an explicit white list or black list.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira