Hi,

We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
licensed.  I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
spec.  I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
using Apache licensed of their specs.  I don't know the exact
procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
> if they would be interested.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> -- dims
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
> <nlgal...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 from me Bryant.
>>
>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I don't 
>> know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming they've been 
>> contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities.
>>
>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>>
>>
>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR spec 
>> from geronimo? :)
>>
>> Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com>
>>
>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
>>
>> Please respond to
>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> To
>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org
>> cc
>>
>> Subject
>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>>
>> -- dims
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk <bryant....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
>> > (Apache licensed) versions of the spec.  Should we also consider
>> > contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1?  I don't see one in the Maven
>> > repository that's Apache licensed.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>

Reply via email to