Re: SOAP over WebSocket
Ordering is not needed at all. Correlation ID is enough as I expect that some requests will take more time that another and it's OK. Anyway, thanks a lot for your inputs! -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/SOAP-over-WebSocket-tp5742556p5745365.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Should we introduce 3.1.0 Trunk
Hi Andriy On 19/06/14 12:47, Andrey Redko wrote: Hi Sergey, Just some thoughts on that: if we have features for 3.1 already in work, it makes sense to introduce new branch for 3.1.x I might be wrong but it seems like 3.0.x is going to be a mainstream for a while and as such should stay a trunk. Well, I hope 3.0.1 will be released soon enough to address the issues already found in 3.0.0, while releasing 3.1.0 can take its time, 3.1.0 can take more of new changes (like more advanced Java 8 support Dan has talked about, etc) Thanks, Sergey Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Sergey Beryozkin mailto:sberyoz...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Should we introduce 3.1.0 trunk and 3.0.x branch respectively ? May be we should wait till 2.6.x is closed first... Thanks, Sergey
Re: Should we introduce 3.1.0 Trunk
Hi Sergey, Just some thoughts on that: if we have features for 3.1 already in work, it makes sense to introduce new branch for 3.1.x I might be wrong but it seems like 3.0.x is going to be a mainstream for a while and as such should stay a trunk. Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi > > Should we introduce 3.1.0 trunk and 3.0.x branch respectively ? > May be we should wait till 2.6.x is closed first... > > Thanks, Sergey >
