Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond
I will check it out shortly, thanks a lot Jim! Best Regards, Andriy Redko JM> @Andriy, I finally get time to back on this task. I just sent a PR as you JM> suggested : https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/855 JM> and labeled it with "work-in-progress". JM> If anyone has any idea to improve this, feel free to comment, update or JM> replace it with another PR. JM> Thanks, JM> Jim JM> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 8:55 AM Jim Ma wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 4:56 AM Andriy Redko wrote: >>> Hey Jim, >>> No, we don't have a branch just yet, primarily because we depend on the >>> few >>> snapshots in 3.5.0/master. >>> @Colm do you have an idea regarding xmlschema 2.3.0 release timelines? >>> @Dan do you have an idea regarding neethi 3.2.0 release timelines? >>> At worst, you could create a new branch for this feature, or submit a >>> pull request against master which we should be able to re-target later >>> against the right branch (should be easy). What do you think? >> This is a good idea. I'll send a PR against the master, and later we can >> decide the place to merge. >> Thanks, Andriy. >>> Best Regards, >>> Andriy Redko >>> JM> Thanks for more updates , Andriy. >>> JM> Is there a place/workspace branch, I can send a PR for this change? >>> JM> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 9:20 PM Andriy Redko wrote: >>> >> Hey Jim, >>> >> Thanks a lot for taking the lead on this one. Just want to chime in on >>> a >>> >> few points. Indeed, as >>> >> per previous discussion in this thread, it seems like it make sense to >>> >> provide only the subset >>> >> of shaded modules with Jakarta namespace. Also, it was confirmed >>> yesterday >>> >> that Spring Framework >>> >> 6 milestones will be available in November this year but the first >>> >> snapshots will be out in late >>> >> September / early October, looks pretty promising. One **unexpected** >>> part >>> >> of the announcement >>> >> is JDK17 baseline for Spring Framework & Co, that could be a bummer >>> but I >>> >> have the feeling that >>> >> it will be lowered to JDK11. Thank you. >>> >> Best Regards, >>> >> Andriy Redko >>> >> JM> Good point, Romain. We need to look at what to do to make sure all >>> >> JM> artifacts are included and transformed if this becomes a cxf >>> module. >>> >> JM> BTW, Spring 6 GA supports jakarta ee9 will come in Q4 2022 : >>> >> JM> >>> >> >>> https://spring.io/blog/2021/09/02/a-java-17-and-jakarta-ee-9-baseline-for-spring-framework-6 >>> >> JM> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 6:20 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>> >> JM> wrote: >>> >> >> Le ven. 3 sept. 2021 à 11:30, Jim Ma a >>> écrit : >>> >> >>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 9:39 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>> >> >>> wrote: >>> >> Le mer. 25 août 2021 à 13:39, Jim Ma a >>> écrit : >>> >> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 2:10 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> Le jeu. 19 août 2021 à 22:45, Andriy Redko a >>> >> >> écrit : >>> >> >>> Hi Romain, >>> >> >>> Sorry for the delayed response. I have been thinking about your >>> >> (and >>> >> >>> Jim) suggestions >>> >> >>> and came to surprising conclusion: do we actually need to >>> >> officially >>> >> >>> release anything >>> >> >>> to shade/overwrite javax <-> jakarta? Generally, we could shade >>> >> >>> Spring or/and any other >>> >> >>> dependency but we would certainly not bundle it as part of CXF >>> >> >>> distribution (I hope you >>> >> >>> would agree), so not really useful unless we publish them. As >>> such, >>> >> >>> probably the best >>> >> >>> interim solution is to document what it takes to shade CXF >>> (javax >>> >> <-> >>> >> >>> jakarta) and let >>> >> >>> the end users (application/service developers) use that when >>> >> needed? >>> >> >>> In this case >>> >> >>> basically CXF, Spring, Geronimo, Swagger, ... would follow the >>> same >>> >> >>> shading rules. At >>> >> >>> least, we could start with that (documenting the shading >>> process) >>> >> and >>> >> >>> likely get some >>> >> >>> early feedback while working on full-fledged support? WDYT? >>> >> >> This is what is done and makes it hard for nothing to >>> maintain/fix - >>> >> >> dont even look at tomee solution for shading please ;) - IMHO. >>> >> >> Being said it costs nothing to cxf to produce jakarta jars, >>> that it >>> >> >> makes it ee 9 compliant and more consistent for all but spring >>> >> usage (ee >>> >> >> integrators, plain tomcat 10 users etc...), I think it is worth >>> >> doing it, >>> >> >> at minimum. >>> >> >> At least a jakarta jaxrs (over jakarta servlet) bundle would be >>> a >>> >> good >>> >> >> progress, not sure jaxws and other parts would be helpful since >>> >> they tend >>> >> >> to be in maintainance mode from what I saw. >>> >> >> So IMHO the best is a
Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond
@Andriy, I finally get time to back on this task. I just sent a PR as you suggested : https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/855 and labeled it with "work-in-progress". If anyone has any idea to improve this, feel free to comment, update or replace it with another PR. Thanks, Jim On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 8:55 AM Jim Ma wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 4:56 AM Andriy Redko wrote: > >> Hey Jim, >> >> No, we don't have a branch just yet, primarily because we depend on the >> few >> snapshots in 3.5.0/master. >> >> @Colm do you have an idea regarding xmlschema 2.3.0 release timelines? >> @Dan do you have an idea regarding neethi 3.2.0 release timelines? >> >> At worst, you could create a new branch for this feature, or submit a >> pull request against master which we should be able to re-target later >> against the right branch (should be easy). What do you think? >> > > This is a good idea. I'll send a PR against the master, and later we can > decide the place to merge. > Thanks, Andriy. > > > >> >> Best Regards, >> Andriy Redko >> >> JM> Thanks for more updates , Andriy. >> JM> Is there a place/workspace branch, I can send a PR for this change? >> >> JM> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 9:20 PM Andriy Redko wrote: >> >> >> Hey Jim, >> >> >> Thanks a lot for taking the lead on this one. Just want to chime in on >> a >> >> few points. Indeed, as >> >> per previous discussion in this thread, it seems like it make sense to >> >> provide only the subset >> >> of shaded modules with Jakarta namespace. Also, it was confirmed >> yesterday >> >> that Spring Framework >> >> 6 milestones will be available in November this year but the first >> >> snapshots will be out in late >> >> September / early October, looks pretty promising. One **unexpected** >> part >> >> of the announcement >> >> is JDK17 baseline for Spring Framework & Co, that could be a bummer >> but I >> >> have the feeling that >> >> it will be lowered to JDK11. Thank you. >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Andriy Redko >> >> >> >> JM> Good point, Romain. We need to look at what to do to make sure all >> >> JM> artifacts are included and transformed if this becomes a cxf >> module. >> >> >> JM> BTW, Spring 6 GA supports jakarta ee9 will come in Q4 2022 : >> >> JM> >> >> >> https://spring.io/blog/2021/09/02/a-java-17-and-jakarta-ee-9-baseline-for-spring-framework-6 >> >> >> JM> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 6:20 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < >> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> >> JM> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Le ven. 3 sept. 2021 à 11:30, Jim Ma a >> écrit : >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 9:39 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < >> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Le mer. 25 août 2021 à 13:39, Jim Ma a >> écrit : >> >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 2:10 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < >> >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Le jeu. 19 août 2021 à 22:45, Andriy Redko a >> >> >> écrit : >> >> >> >>> Hi Romain, >> >> >> >>> Sorry for the delayed response. I have been thinking about your >> >> (and >> >> >>> Jim) suggestions >> >> >>> and came to surprising conclusion: do we actually need to >> >> officially >> >> >>> release anything >> >> >>> to shade/overwrite javax <-> jakarta? Generally, we could shade >> >> >>> Spring or/and any other >> >> >>> dependency but we would certainly not bundle it as part of CXF >> >> >>> distribution (I hope you >> >> >>> would agree), so not really useful unless we publish them. As >> such, >> >> >>> probably the best >> >> >>> interim solution is to document what it takes to shade CXF >> (javax >> >> <-> >> >> >>> jakarta) and let >> >> >>> the end users (application/service developers) use that when >> >> needed? >> >> >>> In this case >> >> >>> basically CXF, Spring, Geronimo, Swagger, ... would follow the >> same >> >> >>> shading rules. At >> >> >>> least, we could start with that (documenting the shading >> process) >> >> and >> >> >>> likely get some >> >> >>> early feedback while working on full-fledged support? WDYT? >> >> >> >> >> >> This is what is done and makes it hard for nothing to >> maintain/fix - >> >> >> dont even look at tomee solution for shading please ;) - IMHO. >> >> >> Being said it costs nothing to cxf to produce jakarta jars, >> that it >> >> >> makes it ee 9 compliant and more consistent for all but spring >> >> usage (ee >> >> >> integrators, plain tomcat 10 users etc...), I think it is worth >> >> doing it, >> >> >> at minimum. >> >> >> At least a jakarta jaxrs (over jakarta servlet) bundle would be >> a >> >> good >> >> >> progress, not sure jaxws and other parts would be helpful since >> >> they tend >> >> >> to be in maintainance mode from what I saw. >> >> >> So IMHO the best is a shade/relocation in the parent to deliver >> a >> >> >> jakarta artifact for all module + a few jakarta bom. But if too >> >> much - >> >>
Re: Releases next week?
Hello Colm, Sure, no objections (from my side), let's do 3.3.x and 3.4.x, thank you! Best Regards, Andriy Redko COh> Hey Andriy, COh> If possible I'd like a little more time on 3.5.0 (a month?). I'd love COh> to get new major releases of XML Security and WSS4J out. But we could COh> get the 3.4.x + 3.3.x patch releases out now, because it's been a COh> while since the last releases. COh> Colm. COh> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:42 AM Andriy Redko wrote: >> Hey guys, >> It seems like we are all set to release 3.3.12, 3.4.5 ... and 3.5.0 next >> week! There is one issue [1] which >> is already fixed but I have asked the user to reconfirm with latest >> 3.4.5-SNAPSHOT, should be resolved in a >> few days (hopefully). Also, for 3.5.0, all SNAPSHOTs have been replaced with >> release versions (thanks Colm >> and Dan for pulling that off), so we should be all set to have releases next >> week (a bit late than planned). >> Thank you! >> Best Regards, >> Andriy Redko >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8597 >> DK> I guess the question is: Which releases? >> DK> 3.4.5 and 3.3.12 are a certain YES! >> DK> The question I have is whether 3.5.0 is ready for release next week or >> should we wait another couple weeks to double check the Java17 stuff >> assuming java17 release happens tomorrow as planned. >> DK> Dan >> >> On Sep 13, 2021, at 11:48 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh >> >> wrote: >> >> I believe we are well overdue getting new releases out, how does early >> >> next week sound? >> >> Colm.
Re: Releases next week?
+1 for 3.4.5 and 3.3.12 release. On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 1:41 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hey Andriy, > > If possible I'd like a little more time on 3.5.0 (a month?). I'd love > to get new major releases of XML Security and WSS4J out. But we could > get the 3.4.x + 3.3.x patch releases out now, because it's been a > while since the last releases. > > Colm. > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:42 AM Andriy Redko wrote: > > > > Hey guys, > > > > It seems like we are all set to release 3.3.12, 3.4.5 ... and 3.5.0 next > week! There is one issue [1] which > > is already fixed but I have asked the user to reconfirm with latest > 3.4.5-SNAPSHOT, should be resolved in a > > few days (hopefully). Also, for 3.5.0, all SNAPSHOTs have been replaced > with release versions (thanks Colm > > and Dan for pulling that off), so we should be all set to have releases > next week (a bit late than planned). > > Thank you! > > > > Best Regards, > > Andriy Redko > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8597 > > > > DK> I guess the question is: Which releases? > > > > DK> 3.4.5 and 3.3.12 are a certain YES! > > > > DK> The question I have is whether 3.5.0 is ready for release next week > or should we wait another couple weeks to double check the Java17 stuff > assuming java17 release happens tomorrow as planned. > > > > DK> Dan > > > > > > > > >> On Sep 13, 2021, at 11:48 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh < > cohei...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > >> I believe we are well overdue getting new releases out, how does early > > >> next week sound? > > > > >> Colm. > > >
