I did some work on this since most of the stuff is just
interfaces/annotations and that's fairly easy, and I can contribute my
initial stab at this. I didn't JavaDoc it but that's something that
can be added. If no one minds, I'll put it in the CXF sandbox.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thu February 11 2010 5:42:08 am Rick McGuire wrote:
>> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
>> > dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
>> > JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
>> > licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
>> > spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
>> > using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact
>> > procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
>> > this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
>> > spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
>>
>> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just
>> hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating
>> this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task:
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
>>
>> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to
>> attach a patch to that Jira issue.
>
> Either that or if people wanted to collaborate on it, create a directory in:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/
> and work on it and then have the Geronimo folks move it to specs when its
> "ready".
>
> The CXF sandbox is open to all Apache committers. The JAX-WS 2.2 spec jar
> was initially created that way. Dims and I worked in the sandbox till it was
> more or less ready.
>
> THAT said, for CXF on trunk and using Java 6, we've gone back to using the in-
> jdk versions of stuff if at all possible. (which wouldn't apply to jax-rs
> obviously) One reason is that the Sun stuff is much better javadoc'd and
> we've had some developers complain about that when working in IDE's. To
> switch from Sun's version, that is something that would need to be addressed
> as well.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas
> wrote:
>> >> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
>> >> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
>> >> if they would be interested.
>> >>
>> >> +1 from me.
>> >>
>> >> -- dims
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
>> >>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> +1 from me Bryant.
>> >>>
>> >>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I
>> >>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming
>> >>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities.
>> >>>
>> >>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Nick
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR
>> >>> spec from geronimo? :)
>> >>>
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas
>> >>>
>> >>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
>> >>>
>> >>> Please respond to
>> >>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>> To
>> >>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> cc
>> >>>
>> >>> Subject
>> >>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
>> >>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>> >>>
>> >>> -- dims
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk
> wrote:
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
>> >>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider
>> >>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven
>> >>>> repository that's Apache licensed.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dk...@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
