RE: Build 2.7.5 tomorrow...
+1 (non binding) to release 2.7.5 Will contain fix of CXF-4897 for STS. Regards, Andrei. > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] > Sent: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2013 15:49 > To: dev@cxf.apache.org > Subject: Build 2.7.5 tomorrow... > > > It looks like we have the WS-Discovery stuff nailed down (and I'd like to blog > about it a bit but would like a release first) and we've also fixed a few bugs > related to OSGi/Camel that I'd like to get out to resolve some Camel issues. > We also "properly" fixed the Woodstox dependency problem introduced in > 2.7.4. Thus, I'm thinking about doing a 2.7.5 build tomorrow. I'm kind of > undecided about 2.5.11/2.6.8 as the above issues (other than the woodstox > one) are 2.7.x specific. Thus, I'll likely just do 2.7.5 this time. That > might help > drive users to 2.7.x as well. :-) > > Thoughts? Issues? > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - > http://coders.talend.com
Re: Build 2.7.5 tomorrow...
+1 (non binding) good to resolve wood stox issue On May 3, 2013 4:45 AM, "Aki Yoshida" wrote: > +1 for 2.7.5 release > > thanks. > aki > > > > 2013/5/2 Daniel Kulp > > > > > It looks like we have the WS-Discovery stuff nailed down (and I'd like to > > blog about it a bit but would like a release first) and we've also fixed > a > > few bugs related to OSGi/Camel that I'd like to get out to resolve some > > Camel issues.We also "properly" fixed the Woodstox dependency problem > > introduced in 2.7.4. Thus, I'm thinking about doing a 2.7.5 build > > tomorrow. I'm kind of undecided about 2.5.11/2.6.8 as the above issues > > (other than the woodstox one) are 2.7.x specific. Thus, I'll likely just > > do 2.7.5 this time. That might help drive users to 2.7.x as well. :-) > > > > Thoughts? Issues? > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog > > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > > > > >
Re: Build 2.7.5 tomorrow...
+1 for 2.7.5 release thanks. aki 2013/5/2 Daniel Kulp > > It looks like we have the WS-Discovery stuff nailed down (and I'd like to > blog about it a bit but would like a release first) and we've also fixed a > few bugs related to OSGi/Camel that I'd like to get out to resolve some > Camel issues.We also "properly" fixed the Woodstox dependency problem > introduced in 2.7.4. Thus, I'm thinking about doing a 2.7.5 build > tomorrow. I'm kind of undecided about 2.5.11/2.6.8 as the above issues > (other than the woodstox one) are 2.7.x specific. Thus, I'll likely just > do 2.7.5 this time. That might help drive users to 2.7.x as well. :-) > > Thoughts? Issues? > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >
Re: Build 2.7.5 tomorrow...
+1 to release 2.7.5 thanks － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/ Twitter: freemanfang Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042 weibo: @Freeman小屋 On 2013-5-2, at 下午9:48, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > It looks like we have the WS-Discovery stuff nailed down (and I'd like to > blog about it a bit but would like a release first) and we've also fixed a > few bugs related to OSGi/Camel that I'd like to get out to resolve some Camel > issues.We also "properly" fixed the Woodstox dependency problem > introduced in 2.7.4. Thus, I'm thinking about doing a 2.7.5 build tomorrow. > I'm kind of undecided about 2.5.11/2.6.8 as the above issues (other than > the woodstox one) are 2.7.x specific. Thus, I'll likely just do 2.7.5 this > time. That might help drive users to 2.7.x as well. :-) > > Thoughts? Issues? > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >
RE: Build 2.7.5 tomorrow...
+1 Sounds like a good idea. We're looking for a release that contains a the -Xbgi plugin from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4899. We're using the 2.6.x tree though so it'd be good to finally drop my own patch. :-) We're an ANT based shop so 2.6.x is what we need to use. Regards, Alec -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2013 15:49 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Build 2.7.5 tomorrow... It looks like we have the WS-Discovery stuff nailed down (and I'd like to blog about it a bit but would like a release first) and we've also fixed a few bugs related to OSGi/Camel that I'd like to get out to resolve some Camel issues. We also "properly" fixed the Woodstox dependency problem introduceI0d in 2.7.4. Thus, I'm thinking about doing a 2.7.5 build tomorrow. I'm kind of undecided about 2.5.11/2.6.8 as the above issues (other than the woodstox one) are 2.7.x specific. Thus, I'll likely just do 2.7.5 this time. That might help drive users to 2.7.x as well. :-) Thoughts? Issues? -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Build 2.7.5 tomorrow...
+1 from me, as long as we'll include any changes we have backported so far in e.g. 2.6.x in a future release :-) On 05/02/2013 03:48 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > It looks like we have the WS-Discovery stuff nailed down (and I'd like to > blog about it a bit but would like a release first) and we've also fixed a > few bugs related to OSGi/Camel that I'd like to get out to resolve some Camel > issues.We also "properly" fixed the Woodstox dependency problem > introduced in 2.7.4. Thus, I'm thinking about doing a 2.7.5 build tomorrow. > I'm kind of undecided about 2.5.11/2.6.8 as the above issues (other than > the woodstox one) are 2.7.x specific. Thus, I'll likely just do 2.7.5 this > time. That might help drive users to 2.7.x as well. :-) > > Thoughts? Issues? > -- Alessio Soldano Web Service Lead, JBoss
Build 2.7.5 tomorrow...
It looks like we have the WS-Discovery stuff nailed down (and I'd like to blog about it a bit but would like a release first) and we've also fixed a few bugs related to OSGi/Camel that I'd like to get out to resolve some Camel issues. We also "properly" fixed the Woodstox dependency problem introduced in 2.7.4. Thus, I'm thinking about doing a 2.7.5 build tomorrow. I'm kind of undecided about 2.5.11/2.6.8 as the above issues (other than the woodstox one) are 2.7.x specific. Thus, I'll likely just do 2.7.5 this time. That might help drive users to 2.7.x as well. :-) Thoughts? Issues? -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
