Re: log4j when running unit tests?

2008-10-27 Thread Daniel Kulp 
On Saturday 25 October 2008 1:45:49 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> log4j is a lot easier to reconfigure than j.u.l. No -D, just a file in
> classpath.
>
> Could I persuade everyone else that it would make sense to have
> AbstractCXFTest turn on the log4j logging shim?

log4j isn't on the classpath for any of the tests other than in common/common.  
 
And the maven builds ARE setup so all you need to do is add a file into the 
classpath.

-- 
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dankulp.com/blog

log4j when running unit tests?

2008-10-25 Thread Benson Margulies 
log4j is a lot easier to reconfigure than j.u.l. No -D, just a file in
classpath.

Could I persuade everyone else that it would make sense to have
AbstractCXFTest turn on the log4j logging shim?