[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Hi all, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2. All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/ Staging artifacts can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/ This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here: https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2. For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0: https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0 For a summary of the changes in this release, see: https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/ Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, 17 May 2021, 4pm EST). [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
Ok, then I think we're all in agreement. This vote is cancelled. The PR to fix this is now availbale here: https://github.com/apache/daffodil/pull/564 Once that gets +1's and is merged, I'll start the process for rc2. On 5/14/21 12:42 PM, Beckerle, Mike wrote: > Agree that we should go to an rc2. > > We are going to have one IBM compatibility regression in this release, on > vcard. But there should be no other surprises. > > > > > From: Adams, Joshua > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 12:23 PM > To: dev@daffodil.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1 > > That seems reasonable to me. Official releases should clearly demonstrate > cross compatibility with IBM's implementation. > > Josh > > From: Steve Lawrence > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 11:58 AM > To: dev@daffodil.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1 > > I've found a bug in the TDML runner that causes the IBM DFDL Crosstester > to fail: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2517 > > This only affects the IBM DFDL Crosstester and not Daffodil, but there > isn't really a great workaround, since there is no way for IBM to report > correct final parse/unparse bit position. > > I'll have a pull ready request shortly. > > Thoughts on cancelling rc1 and include this fix in an rc2? The bug only > affects the IBM DFDL cross tester, but there really is no good workaround. > > On 5/12/21 1:47 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1. >> >> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be >> found at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc1/ >> >> Staging artifacts can be found at: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1020/ >> >> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, >> corresponding to slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS >> file here: >> >> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS >> >> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc1. >> >> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0: >> >> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0 >> >> For a summary of the changes in this release, see: >> >> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/ >> >> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours >> (Saturday, 15 May 2021, 2pm EST). >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
Agree that we should go to an rc2. We are going to have one IBM compatibility regression in this release, on vcard. But there should be no other surprises. From: Adams, Joshua Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 12:23 PM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1 That seems reasonable to me. Official releases should clearly demonstrate cross compatibility with IBM's implementation. Josh From: Steve Lawrence Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 11:58 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1 I've found a bug in the TDML runner that causes the IBM DFDL Crosstester to fail: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2517 This only affects the IBM DFDL Crosstester and not Daffodil, but there isn't really a great workaround, since there is no way for IBM to report correct final parse/unparse bit position. I'll have a pull ready request shortly. Thoughts on cancelling rc1 and include this fix in an rc2? The bug only affects the IBM DFDL cross tester, but there really is no good workaround. On 5/12/21 1:47 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1. > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc1/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1020/ > > This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, > corresponding to slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS > file here: > > https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS > > The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc1. > > For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0: > > https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0 > > For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > > https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/ > > Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > (Saturday, 15 May 2021, 2pm EST). > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
That seems reasonable to me. Official releases should clearly demonstrate cross compatibility with IBM's implementation. Josh From: Steve Lawrence Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 11:58 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1 I've found a bug in the TDML runner that causes the IBM DFDL Crosstester to fail: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2517 This only affects the IBM DFDL Crosstester and not Daffodil, but there isn't really a great workaround, since there is no way for IBM to report correct final parse/unparse bit position. I'll have a pull ready request shortly. Thoughts on cancelling rc1 and include this fix in an rc2? The bug only affects the IBM DFDL cross tester, but there really is no good workaround. On 5/12/21 1:47 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1. > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc1/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1020/ > > This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, > corresponding to slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS > file here: > > https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS > > The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc1. > > For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0: > > https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0 > > For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > > https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/ > > Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > (Saturday, 15 May 2021, 2pm EST). > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
I've found a bug in the TDML runner that causes the IBM DFDL Crosstester to fail: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2517 This only affects the IBM DFDL Crosstester and not Daffodil, but there isn't really a great workaround, since there is no way for IBM to report correct final parse/unparse bit position. I'll have a pull ready request shortly. Thoughts on cancelling rc1 and include this fix in an rc2? The bug only affects the IBM DFDL cross tester, but there really is no good workaround. On 5/12/21 1:47 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1. > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc1/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1020/ > > This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, > corresponding to slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS > file here: > > https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS > > The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc1. > > For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0: > > https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0 > > For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > > https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/ > > Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > (Saturday, 15 May 2021, 2pm EST). > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >
