+1
I ran a regression testing suite of 79 DFDL schemas against 3.8.0-rc2.
Most of these are internal to Owl, but some are public.
The only failures (6) were expected ones.
[fail] (01/79) amhs-tcp-test-data - Expected failure
[pass] (02/79) dfdl-agnosc-remedy
[pass] (03/79) dfdl-amhs-combined
[pass] (04/79) dfdl-amhs-envelope
[pass] (05/79) dfdl-army-drrs-lh
[pass] (06/79) dfdl-asterix
[pass] (07/79) dfdl-asterix-owl
[pass] (08/79) dfdl-bmp
[pass] (09/79) dfdl-cef
[pass] (10/79) dfdl-ces
[pass] (11/79) dfdl-cobol-examples
[pass] (12/79) dfdl-csv
[pass] (13/79) dfdl-disv6
[pass] (14/79) dfdl-edifact
[pass] (15/79) dfdl-ethernetIP
[pass] (16/79) dfdl-examples-helloworld
[pass] (17/79) dfdl-examples-hexwords
[pass] (18/79) dfdl-examples-self-descriptive-data
[fail] (19/79) dfdl-examples-xslt-csv - Expected Failure.
[pass] (20/79) dfdl-flight-plan-owl
[pass] (21/79) dfdl-geonames
[pass] (22/79) dfdl-gif
[pass] (23/79) dfdl-gmtif
[pass] (24/79) dfdl-hl7
[pass] (25/79) dfdl-ibm4690-tlog
[pass] (26/79) dfdl-iCalendar
[pass] (27/79) dfdl-icd-gps-240
[pass] (28/79) dfdl-imf
[pass] (29/79) dfdl-imf-icalendar-cse
[pass] (30/79) dfdl-ipf-demo
[pass] (31/79) dfdl-ipfix
[pass] (32/79) dfdl-iso8583
[pass] (33/79) dfdl-janap-128
[pass] (34/79) dfdl-jpeg
[pass] (35/79) dfdl-jpeg2000
[fail] (36/79) dfdl-jreap - Expected failure (needs missing
extendedcharsets module)
[fail] (37/79) dfdl-link16 - Expected failure (needs updates)
[pass] (38/79) dfdl-magvar
[pass] (39/79) dfdl-mil-std-2045
[pass] (40/79) dfdl-nacha
[pass] (41/79) dfdl-nact
[pass] (42/79) dfdl-nitf
[pass] (43/79) dfdl-notam
[pass] (44/79) dfdl-p8
[pass] (45/79) dfdl-pcap
[pass] (46/79) dfdl-plc4x-knxnet-ip
[pass] (47/79) dfdl-plc4x-s7
[pass] (48/79) dfdl-png
[pass] (49/79) dfdl-praat-textgrid
[pass] (50/79) dfdl-quasixml
[pass] (51/79) dfdl-raster
[pass] (52/79) dfdl-shp
[pass] (53/79) dfdl-skyview
[pass] (54/79) dfdl-sotf
[pass] (55/79) dfdl-stanag-5516
[pass] (56/79) dfdl-stanag-5516-with-nact
[pass] (57/79) dfdl-syslog
[pass] (58/79) dfdl-uscg-ucop-lh
[pass] (59/79) dfdl-usmtf
[pass] (60/79) dfdl-usmtf-generic
[pass] (61/79) dfdl-usmtf-mitre
[pass] (62/79) dfdl-vcard
[pass] (63/79) dfdl-vmf
[pass] (64/79) dfdl-weather
[pass] (65/79) gen-oilstock
[fail] (66/79) ibm-dfdl-crosstester - Expected Failure
[fail] (67/79) janap-otg-schemas - Expected Failure
[pass] (68/79) morocco-test-data-cui
[pass] (69/79) nexus-xsd
[pass] (70/79) noc-header
[pass] (71/79) otg-schemas
[pass] (72/79) pmmc-itv-dfdl
[pass] (73/79) pmmc-itv-xsd
[pass] (74/79) rps-42-62-82
[pass] (75/79) udf-geoutil
[pass] (76/79) usareur-otg-schemas
[pass] (77/79) vmf-pmmc-dfdl
[pass] (78/79) vmf-pmmc-xsd
[pass] (79/79) zip-layer-transformer
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 12:37 PM Mike Beckerle wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc2.
>
> Since RC1,
> * a Keys/Signing issue has been resolved
> * a schema-compilation performance issue was found to be non-reproducible
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.8.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1043/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 101EA16F63105E72,
> corresponding to mbecke...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
> file here: https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.8.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all resolved JIRA issues tagged with
> 3.8.0: https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.8.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.8.0/
>
> Please review and vote.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Friday 14 June 2024, 12:37pm EDT.US or 2024-06-14T16:37:00Z).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
