Re: [DISCUSS] Release Daffodil 3.8.0
So 72 hours have elapsed on this discussion. Steve suggested a couple ticket's PRs be merged before the release, and those have been merged, so based on that and lack of any further discussion I will volunteer to be the release manager, and will create an RC1 and bring it up for evaluation and voting subsequently. On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 9:39 AM Steve Lawrence wrote: > Also, PR #1219 is probably worth merging. It's a one-line change and I > don't > think is controversial, just needs another +1. > > On 2024-06-04 09:03 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > +1 on releasing a 3.8.0 > > > > I think we should also include PR #1253, it's fairly small and can make > schema > > tests run much faster. > > > > We also might want to merge all the dependabot/scala steward PRs. I'll > go > > through them today and then it should be quick for someone to give them > all a +1 > > and merge. > > > > > > > > On 2024-05-31 03:03 PM, Mike Beckerle wrote: > >> There is one major feature in 3.8.0, the revised "layers" API. > >> > >> I'd like to discuss releasing 3.8.0 shortly as this feature is complete. > >> > >> You can see the user doc for it and the javadoc for it here: > >> > >> - https://daffodil.apache.org/layers/ > >> - > >> > >> > https://daffodil.apache.org/docs/3.8.0/javadoc/org/apache/daffodil/runtime1/layers/api/package-summary.html > >> > >> If this discussion is positive I'll look into creating a release > candidate > >> for evaluation. > >> > >> Mike Beckerle > >> Apache Daffodil PMC | daffodil.apache.org > >> OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | > www.ogf.org/ogf/doku.php/standards/dfdl/dfdl > >> Owl Cyber Defense | www.owlcyberdefense.com > >> > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Daffodil 3.8.0
I just approved this PR. On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 9:39 AM Steve Lawrence wrote: > Also, PR #1219 is probably worth merging. It's a one-line change and I > don't > think is controversial, just needs another +1. > > On 2024-06-04 09:03 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > +1 on releasing a 3.8.0 > > > > I think we should also include PR #1253, it's fairly small and can make > schema > > tests run much faster. > > > > We also might want to merge all the dependabot/scala steward PRs. I'll > go > > through them today and then it should be quick for someone to give them > all a +1 > > and merge. > > > > > > > > On 2024-05-31 03:03 PM, Mike Beckerle wrote: > >> There is one major feature in 3.8.0, the revised "layers" API. > >> > >> I'd like to discuss releasing 3.8.0 shortly as this feature is complete. > >> > >> You can see the user doc for it and the javadoc for it here: > >> > >> - https://daffodil.apache.org/layers/ > >> - > >> > >> > https://daffodil.apache.org/docs/3.8.0/javadoc/org/apache/daffodil/runtime1/layers/api/package-summary.html > >> > >> If this discussion is positive I'll look into creating a release > candidate > >> for evaluation. > >> > >> Mike Beckerle > >> Apache Daffodil PMC | daffodil.apache.org > >> OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | > www.ogf.org/ogf/doku.php/standards/dfdl/dfdl > >> Owl Cyber Defense | www.owlcyberdefense.com > >> > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Daffodil 3.8.0
Also, PR #1219 is probably worth merging. It's a one-line change and I don't think is controversial, just needs another +1. On 2024-06-04 09:03 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: +1 on releasing a 3.8.0 I think we should also include PR #1253, it's fairly small and can make schema tests run much faster. We also might want to merge all the dependabot/scala steward PRs. I'll go through them today and then it should be quick for someone to give them all a +1 and merge. On 2024-05-31 03:03 PM, Mike Beckerle wrote: There is one major feature in 3.8.0, the revised "layers" API. I'd like to discuss releasing 3.8.0 shortly as this feature is complete. You can see the user doc for it and the javadoc for it here: - https://daffodil.apache.org/layers/ - https://daffodil.apache.org/docs/3.8.0/javadoc/org/apache/daffodil/runtime1/layers/api/package-summary.html If this discussion is positive I'll look into creating a release candidate for evaluation. Mike Beckerle Apache Daffodil PMC | daffodil.apache.org OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | www.ogf.org/ogf/doku.php/standards/dfdl/dfdl Owl Cyber Defense | www.owlcyberdefense.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Daffodil 3.8.0
+1 on releasing a 3.8.0 I think we should also include PR #1253, it's fairly small and can make schema tests run much faster. We also might want to merge all the dependabot/scala steward PRs. I'll go through them today and then it should be quick for someone to give them all a +1 and merge. On 2024-05-31 03:03 PM, Mike Beckerle wrote: There is one major feature in 3.8.0, the revised "layers" API. I'd like to discuss releasing 3.8.0 shortly as this feature is complete. You can see the user doc for it and the javadoc for it here: - https://daffodil.apache.org/layers/ - https://daffodil.apache.org/docs/3.8.0/javadoc/org/apache/daffodil/runtime1/layers/api/package-summary.html If this discussion is positive I'll look into creating a release candidate for evaluation. Mike Beckerle Apache Daffodil PMC | daffodil.apache.org OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | www.ogf.org/ogf/doku.php/standards/dfdl/dfdl Owl Cyber Defense | www.owlcyberdefense.com
[DISCUSS] Release Daffodil 3.8.0
There is one major feature in 3.8.0, the revised "layers" API. I'd like to discuss releasing 3.8.0 shortly as this feature is complete. You can see the user doc for it and the javadoc for it here: - https://daffodil.apache.org/layers/ - https://daffodil.apache.org/docs/3.8.0/javadoc/org/apache/daffodil/runtime1/layers/api/package-summary.html If this discussion is positive I'll look into creating a release candidate for evaluation. Mike Beckerle Apache Daffodil PMC | daffodil.apache.org OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | www.ogf.org/ogf/doku.php/standards/dfdl/dfdl Owl Cyber Defense | www.owlcyberdefense.com
