Re: [dba-dev] MWS builds and SRB development
Hi Zoltán, It is a possible to attach to any MWS, versions of SRB which allows new features supported in main code, same way as dictionaries installed with OOo? bundling extensions with the OOo distribution is technically easily possible, but a political issue. People need to decide and *agree* to which extension is/not bundled, and this seems to be a difficult process. Reporting is, in my opinion, an integral part of a database application, so you ask me, SRB should be an integral part of Base (not even in the form of an extension). I took the opportunity to start, again, a discussion about integrating SRB into Base - something I'd really like to see happening, as it would significantly lower the efforts around SRB (e.g. testing different SRB versions for compatibility with different OOo versions). Let's see. Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer frank.schoenh...@sun.com - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@dba.openoffice.org
Re: [dba-dev] MWS builds and SRB development
Hi Frank, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany írta: Hi Zoltán, It is a possible to attach to any MWS, versions of SRB which allows new features supported in main code, same way as dictionaries installed with OOo? bundling extensions with the OOo distribution is technically easily possible, but a political issue. People need to decide and *agree* to which extension is/not bundled, and this seems to be a difficult process. Reporting is, in my opinion, an integral part of a database application, so you ask me, SRB should be an integral part of Base (not even in the form of an extension). I fully agree with it. I took the opportunity to start, again, a discussion about integrating SRB into Base - something I'd really like to see happening, as it would significantly lower the efforts around SRB (e.g. testing different SRB versions for compatibility with different OOo versions). Discussion can be started as soon as possible. But I read release status minutes log 2009-02-09 and feel that will not happen, too early. Zoltan Let's see. Ciao Frank
Re: [dba-dev] MWS builds and SRB development
Moin, On 12.02.09 09:18, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: Hi Zoltán, It is a possible to attach to any MWS, versions of SRB which allows new features supported in main code, same way as dictionaries installed with OOo? bundling extensions with the OOo distribution is technically easily possible, but a political issue. People need to decide and *agree* to which extension is/not bundled, and this seems to be a difficult process. Reporting is, in my opinion, an integral part of a database application, so you ask me, SRB should be an integral part of Base (not even in the form of an extension). I took the opportunity to start, again, a discussion about integrating SRB into Base - something I'd really like to see happening, as it would significantly lower the efforts around SRB (e.g. testing different SRB versions for compatibility with different OOo versions). Someone could think to submit an issue integrating the SRB into OOo with a high vote would do the job. It's some kind of community binding. Let's see. Yes. best regards, Ocke Ciao Frank -- Ocke Janssen Tel: +49 40 23646 661, x1 Dipl. Inf(FH) Fax: +49 40 23646 550 Sun Microsystems Inc. Nagelsweg 55 mailto:ocke.jans...@sun.com D-20097 Hamburg http://www.sun.com/staroffice Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
Re: [dba-dev] MWS builds and SRB development
Hi Ocke, Ocke Janssen írta: Moin, On 12.02.09 09:18, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: Hi Zoltán, It is a possible to attach to any MWS, versions of SRB which allows new features supported in main code, same way as dictionaries installed with OOo? bundling extensions with the OOo distribution is technically easily possible, but a political issue. People need to decide and *agree* to which extension is/not bundled, and this seems to be a difficult process. Reporting is, in my opinion, an integral part of a database application, so you ask me, SRB should be an integral part of Base (not even in the form of an extension). I took the opportunity to start, again, a discussion about integrating SRB into Base - something I'd really like to see happening, as it would significantly lower the efforts around SRB (e.g. testing different SRB versions for compatibility with different OOo versions). Someone could think to submit an issue integrating the SRB into OOo with a high vote would do the job. It's some kind of community binding. Done: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99143 Let's see. Yes. best regards, Ocke Ciao Frank - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@dba.openoffice.org
