Re: Time to cut 0.5?
I haven't looked at it yet. I'm fairly swamped right now to. On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1, data module needs review and we (with Jean-Louis) already saw an issue > in its usage: it is not compatible with DTO at all. > > It would be great to enhance the API to support it (using ModelMapper it > would be trivial to implement, the only issue will be to add an interface > Repository) -> probably needs another discuss > thread but i'll let JL open it > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > 2013/7/10 Mark Struberg > > > yup, I really like to get 0.5 out of the door. We need some reviews first > > though. > > Mainly the new query and beanval modules. > > Sadly, I'm 180% overloaded at $$dayjob right now. Hope I can find some > > time on the weekend. > > > > Or did anyone else take a deep look at it already? > > Then I'd be happy to run the release tasks. > > > > This I would also like to document the release process so everybody is > > able to run it. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Jason Porter > > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Sunday, 7 July 2013, 2:20 > > Subject: Re: Time to cut 0.5? > > > > Yep, saw the deluge of emails come in. > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:18 PM, John D. Ament > >wrote: > > > > > 0.5 was intended to be a small release, per [1] > > > > > > Note, I just moved the config module ones per your note in the top > level > > > issue. > > > > > > [1]: > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/deltaspike-dev/201306.mbox/browser > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Jason Porter > > >wrote: > > > > > > > I must have been sleeping or something for 0.5, I didn't think that > > much > > > > work had been done. If that much work had been done, why are there > only > > > > nine closed issues in 0.5 in JIRA? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:09 PM, John D. Ament < > john.d.am...@gmail.com > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > Errr, 3 new modules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:03 PM, John D. Ament < > > john.d.am...@gmail.com > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > We're a couple weeks late, but is anyone else interested in > seeing > > > 0.5 > > > > > > cut? Seems like we have a slew of bug fixes and two new modules > in > > > the > > > > > > hangar waiting to take off. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jason Porter > > > > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jason Porter > > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp > > > > > -- Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
Re: Time to cut 0.5?
+1, data module needs review and we (with Jean-Louis) already saw an issue in its usage: it is not compatible with DTO at all. It would be great to enhance the API to support it (using ModelMapper it would be trivial to implement, the only issue will be to add an interface Repository) -> probably needs another discuss thread but i'll let JL open it *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/7/10 Mark Struberg > yup, I really like to get 0.5 out of the door. We need some reviews first > though. > Mainly the new query and beanval modules. > Sadly, I'm 180% overloaded at $$dayjob right now. Hope I can find some > time on the weekend. > > Or did anyone else take a deep look at it already? > Then I'd be happy to run the release tasks. > > This I would also like to document the release process so everybody is > able to run it. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > - Original Message - > From: Jason Porter > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, 7 July 2013, 2:20 > Subject: Re: Time to cut 0.5? > > Yep, saw the deluge of emails come in. > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:18 PM, John D. Ament >wrote: > > > 0.5 was intended to be a small release, per [1] > > > > Note, I just moved the config module ones per your note in the top level > > issue. > > > > [1]: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/deltaspike-dev/201306.mbox/browser > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Jason Porter > >wrote: > > > > > I must have been sleeping or something for 0.5, I didn't think that > much > > > work had been done. If that much work had been done, why are there only > > > nine closed issues in 0.5 in JIRA? > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:09 PM, John D. Ament > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Errr, 3 new modules. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:03 PM, John D. Ament < > john.d.am...@gmail.com > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > We're a couple weeks late, but is anyone else interested in seeing > > 0.5 > > > > > cut? Seems like we have a slew of bug fixes and two new modules in > > the > > > > > hangar waiting to take off. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jason Porter > > > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp > > > > > > > > > -- > Jason Porter > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp > >
Re: Time to cut 0.5?
yup, I really like to get 0.5 out of the door. We need some reviews first though. Mainly the new query and beanval modules. Sadly, I'm 180% overloaded at $$dayjob right now. Hope I can find some time on the weekend. Or did anyone else take a deep look at it already? Then I'd be happy to run the release tasks. This I would also like to document the release process so everybody is able to run it. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Jason Porter To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org Cc: Sent: Sunday, 7 July 2013, 2:20 Subject: Re: Time to cut 0.5? Yep, saw the deluge of emails come in. On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:18 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > 0.5 was intended to be a small release, per [1] > > Note, I just moved the config module ones per your note in the top level > issue. > > [1]: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/deltaspike-dev/201306.mbox/browser > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Jason Porter >wrote: > > > I must have been sleeping or something for 0.5, I didn't think that much > > work had been done. If that much work had been done, why are there only > > nine closed issues in 0.5 in JIRA? > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:09 PM, John D. Ament > >wrote: > > > > > Errr, 3 new modules. > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:03 PM, John D. Ament > > >wrote: > > > > > > > We're a couple weeks late, but is anyone else interested in seeing > 0.5 > > > > cut? Seems like we have a slew of bug fixes and two new modules in > the > > > > hangar waiting to take off. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jason Porter > > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp > > > -- Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
Re: Time to cut 0.5?
Yep, saw the deluge of emails come in. On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:18 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > 0.5 was intended to be a small release, per [1] > > Note, I just moved the config module ones per your note in the top level > issue. > > [1]: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/deltaspike-dev/201306.mbox/browser > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Jason Porter >wrote: > > > I must have been sleeping or something for 0.5, I didn't think that much > > work had been done. If that much work had been done, why are there only > > nine closed issues in 0.5 in JIRA? > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:09 PM, John D. Ament > >wrote: > > > > > Errr, 3 new modules. > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:03 PM, John D. Ament > > >wrote: > > > > > > > We're a couple weeks late, but is anyone else interested in seeing > 0.5 > > > > cut? Seems like we have a slew of bug fixes and two new modules in > the > > > > hangar waiting to take off. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jason Porter > > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp > > > -- Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
Re: Time to cut 0.5?
this was supposed to be [1] [1]: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/deltaspike-dev/201306.mbox/%3C1370084405.7203.YahooMailNeo%40web28903.mail.ir2.yahoo.com%3E On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:18 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > 0.5 was intended to be a small release, per [1] > > Note, I just moved the config module ones per your note in the top level > issue. > > [1]: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/deltaspike-dev/201306.mbox/browser > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Jason Porter wrote: > >> I must have been sleeping or something for 0.5, I didn't think that much >> work had been done. If that much work had been done, why are there only >> nine closed issues in 0.5 in JIRA? >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:09 PM, John D. Ament > >wrote: >> >> > Errr, 3 new modules. >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:03 PM, John D. Ament > > >wrote: >> > >> > > We're a couple weeks late, but is anyone else interested in seeing 0.5 >> > > cut? Seems like we have a slew of bug fixes and two new modules in >> the >> > > hangar waiting to take off. >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Jason Porter >> http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp >> > >
Re: Time to cut 0.5?
0.5 was intended to be a small release, per [1] Note, I just moved the config module ones per your note in the top level issue. [1]: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/deltaspike-dev/201306.mbox/browser On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Jason Porter wrote: > I must have been sleeping or something for 0.5, I didn't think that much > work had been done. If that much work had been done, why are there only > nine closed issues in 0.5 in JIRA? > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:09 PM, John D. Ament >wrote: > > > Errr, 3 new modules. > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:03 PM, John D. Ament > >wrote: > > > > > We're a couple weeks late, but is anyone else interested in seeing 0.5 > > > cut? Seems like we have a slew of bug fixes and two new modules in the > > > hangar waiting to take off. > > > > > > > > > -- > Jason Porter > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp >
Re: Time to cut 0.5?
I must have been sleeping or something for 0.5, I didn't think that much work had been done. If that much work had been done, why are there only nine closed issues in 0.5 in JIRA? On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:09 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Errr, 3 new modules. > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:03 PM, John D. Ament >wrote: > > > We're a couple weeks late, but is anyone else interested in seeing 0.5 > > cut? Seems like we have a slew of bug fixes and two new modules in the > > hangar waiting to take off. > > > -- Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
Re: Time to cut 0.5?
Errr, 3 new modules. On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:03 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > We're a couple weeks late, but is anyone else interested in seeing 0.5 > cut? Seems like we have a slew of bug fixes and two new modules in the > hangar waiting to take off. >
Time to cut 0.5?
We're a couple weeks late, but is anyone else interested in seeing 0.5 cut? Seems like we have a slew of bug fixes and two new modules in the hangar waiting to take off.
