[jira] [Updated] (DIRSERVER-2099) NOTICE and LICENSE files for DS 2.0.0-M20 are incorrect
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRSERVER-2099: - Priority: Critical (was: Major) > NOTICE and LICENSE files for DS 2.0.0-M20 are incorrect > --- > > Key: DIRSERVER-2099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2099 > Project: Directory ApacheDS > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M20 >Reporter: Sebb >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.0.0.AM26 > > > NOTICE files are for *required* notices only; they must not contain anything > that is not required. > LICENSE files must contain the text of all applicable licences, or pointers > to the license (which must be included in the distribution). > See the process described here [1] > I think that there are problems with both of these files. > The NOTICE file contains a lot of extraneous text. > The block enclosed in === should be removed entirely, as well as the > following paragraph, which is an unnecessary duplicate. > AFAICT the references to SafeHaus JUG and Clinton Begin don't need to be in > the NOTICE file either. > The LICENSE file says that JUG is licensed under AL v2. > However it does not say which version of JUG is included. > Similarly for the other 3rd party licences. > The NOTICE file mentions software by Clinton Begin, but there is no > corresponding mention in the LICENSE file. > All bundled software must be documented in the LICENSE file. > Entries in the NOTICE file must only be made if required. > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@directory.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@directory.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (DIRSERVER-2099) NOTICE and LICENSE files for DS 2.0.0-M20 are incorrect
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRSERVER-2099: - Fix Version/s: 2.0.0.AM26 > NOTICE and LICENSE files for DS 2.0.0-M20 are incorrect > --- > > Key: DIRSERVER-2099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2099 > Project: Directory ApacheDS > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M20 >Reporter: Sebb >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.0.0.AM26 > > > NOTICE files are for *required* notices only; they must not contain anything > that is not required. > LICENSE files must contain the text of all applicable licences, or pointers > to the license (which must be included in the distribution). > See the process described here [1] > I think that there are problems with both of these files. > The NOTICE file contains a lot of extraneous text. > The block enclosed in === should be removed entirely, as well as the > following paragraph, which is an unnecessary duplicate. > AFAICT the references to SafeHaus JUG and Clinton Begin don't need to be in > the NOTICE file either. > The LICENSE file says that JUG is licensed under AL v2. > However it does not say which version of JUG is included. > Similarly for the other 3rd party licences. > The NOTICE file mentions software by Clinton Begin, but there is no > corresponding mention in the LICENSE file. > All bundled software must be documented in the LICENSE file. > Entries in the NOTICE file must only be made if required. > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@directory.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@directory.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (DIRSERVER-2099) NOTICE and LICENSE files for DS 2.0.0-M20 are incorrect
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRSERVER-2099: - Affects Version/s: 2.0.0-M20 > NOTICE and LICENSE files for DS 2.0.0-M20 are incorrect > --- > > Key: DIRSERVER-2099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2099 > Project: Directory ApacheDS > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M20 >Reporter: Sebb >Priority: Major > > NOTICE files are for *required* notices only; they must not contain anything > that is not required. > LICENSE files must contain the text of all applicable licences, or pointers > to the license (which must be included in the distribution). > See the process described here [1] > I think that there are problems with both of these files. > The NOTICE file contains a lot of extraneous text. > The block enclosed in === should be removed entirely, as well as the > following paragraph, which is an unnecessary duplicate. > AFAICT the references to SafeHaus JUG and Clinton Begin don't need to be in > the NOTICE file either. > The LICENSE file says that JUG is licensed under AL v2. > However it does not say which version of JUG is included. > Similarly for the other 3rd party licences. > The NOTICE file mentions software by Clinton Begin, but there is no > corresponding mention in the LICENSE file. > All bundled software must be documented in the LICENSE file. > Entries in the NOTICE file must only be made if required. > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@directory.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@directory.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (DIRSERVER-2099) NOTICE and LICENSE files for DS 2.0.0-M20 are incorrect
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRSERVER-2099: - Component/s: legal > NOTICE and LICENSE files for DS 2.0.0-M20 are incorrect > --- > > Key: DIRSERVER-2099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2099 > Project: Directory ApacheDS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: legal >Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M20 >Reporter: Sebb >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.0.0.AM26 > > > NOTICE files are for *required* notices only; they must not contain anything > that is not required. > LICENSE files must contain the text of all applicable licences, or pointers > to the license (which must be included in the distribution). > See the process described here [1] > I think that there are problems with both of these files. > The NOTICE file contains a lot of extraneous text. > The block enclosed in === should be removed entirely, as well as the > following paragraph, which is an unnecessary duplicate. > AFAICT the references to SafeHaus JUG and Clinton Begin don't need to be in > the NOTICE file either. > The LICENSE file says that JUG is licensed under AL v2. > However it does not say which version of JUG is included. > Similarly for the other 3rd party licences. > The NOTICE file mentions software by Clinton Begin, but there is no > corresponding mention in the LICENSE file. > All bundled software must be documented in the LICENSE file. > Entries in the NOTICE file must only be made if required. > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@directory.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@directory.apache.org
