[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: add staging tree for network drivers
> > Networking Drivers > > -- > > +M: Ferruh Yigit > > +T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net > > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon > > It will be applied at the beginning of 17.02 cycle to reflect the change. Applied, thanks. So from now, Ferruh will be responsible of the next-net tree. Thank you for your commitment.
[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: add staging tree for network drivers
> Networking Drivers > -- > +M: Ferruh Yigit > +T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon It will be applied at the beginning of 17.02 cycle to reflect the change.
[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: add staging tree for network drivers
Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit --- CC: Bruce Richardson CC: Thomas Monjalon --- MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 065397b..d6bb8f8 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -252,6 +252,8 @@ F: examples/l2fwd-crypto/ Networking Drivers -- +M: Ferruh Yigit +T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net Link bonding M: Declan Doherty -- 2.9.3
[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: add staging tree for network drivers
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 9:22 AM > To: Thomas Monjalon > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: add staging tree for network > drivers > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 05:28:40PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2016-07-25 16:19, Bruce Richardson: > > > +Staging Trees > > > +- > > > + > > > +Networking Drivers > > > +T: git://dpdk.org/dpdk-next-net > > > +M: Bruce Richardson > > > > I thought we could write the next- tree information below the > > existing title: > > > > Networking Drivers > > -- > > > > Maybe, but I think it would work better to have all the staging trees listed > together at the top of the file. Makes it easier to see on opening the file > that they exist. I am going to send a patch to add also the staging tree for crypto. What is the conclusion of this? If we go for this way, we should move also the virtio stuff to this new section, right? Pablo > > /Bruce
[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: add staging tree for network drivers
2016-07-25 16:19, Bruce Richardson: > +Staging Trees > +- > + > +Networking Drivers > +T: git://dpdk.org/dpdk-next-net > +M: Bruce Richardson I thought we could write the next- tree information below the existing title: Networking Drivers --
[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: add staging tree for network drivers
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 05:28:40PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-07-25 16:19, Bruce Richardson: > > +Staging Trees > > +- > > + > > +Networking Drivers > > +T: git://dpdk.org/dpdk-next-net > > +M: Bruce Richardson > > I thought we could write the next- tree information below the > existing title: > > Networking Drivers > -- > Maybe, but I think it would work better to have all the staging trees listed together at the top of the file. Makes it easier to see on opening the file that they exist. /Bruce
[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: add staging tree for network drivers
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson --- MAINTAINERS | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index d099131..844227b 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -34,6 +34,13 @@ Stable Branches --- T: git://dpdk.org/dpdk-stable +Staging Trees +- + +Networking Drivers +T: git://dpdk.org/dpdk-next-net +M: Bruce Richardson + Security Issues --- M: maintainers at dpdk.org -- 2.7.4
