[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix crypto mbuf pool size

2016-10-13 Thread De Lara Guarch, Pablo


> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jastrzebski, MichalX
> K
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 1:48 AM
> To: Azarewicz, PiotrX T; Trahe, Fiona
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix crypto mbuf pool size
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Piotr Azarewicz
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 12:07 PM
> > To: Trahe, Fiona 
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix crypto mbuf pool size
> >
> > This patch fix that created pool for crypto mbufs may be too big in some
> > environments.
> > To avoid the issue, mbuf pool is reverted to its previous size.
> > Moreover, here is added additional small pool with one large mbuf, what
> > is needed in large data test scenarios.
> >
> > Fixes: ffbe3be0d4b5 ("app/test: add libcrypto")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Piotr Azarewicz 
> 
> Acked-by: Michal Jastrzebski 

Applied to dpdk-next-crypto.
Thanks,

Pablo


[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix crypto mbuf pool size

2016-10-13 Thread Jastrzebski, MichalX K
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Piotr Azarewicz
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 12:07 PM
> To: Trahe, Fiona 
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix crypto mbuf pool size
> 
> This patch fix that created pool for crypto mbufs may be too big in some
> environments.
> To avoid the issue, mbuf pool is reverted to its previous size.
> Moreover, here is added additional small pool with one large mbuf, what
> is needed in large data test scenarios.
> 
> Fixes: ffbe3be0d4b5 ("app/test: add libcrypto")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Azarewicz 
> ---
> 
> v2 change:
> - changed check if aad.len > MBUF_SIZE
> - added assertion check for rte_pktmbuf_alloc
> 
>  app/test/test_cryptodev.c |   32 +---
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> index 2917454..7d03899 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static enum rte_cryptodev_type gbl_cryptodev_type;
> 
>  struct crypto_testsuite_params {
>   struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool;
> + struct rte_mempool *large_mbuf_pool;
>   struct rte_mempool *op_mpool;
>   struct rte_cryptodev_config conf;
>   struct rte_cryptodev_qp_conf qp_conf;
> @@ -169,7 +170,7 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
>   /* Not already created so create */
>   ts_params->mbuf_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create(
>   "CRYPTO_MBUFPOOL",
> - NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE, 0,
> UINT16_MAX,
> + NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE, 0,
> MBUF_SIZE,
>   rte_socket_id());
>   if (ts_params->mbuf_pool == NULL) {
>   RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Can't create
> CRYPTO_MBUFPOOL\n");
> @@ -177,6 +178,21 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
>   }
>   }
> 
> + ts_params->large_mbuf_pool = rte_mempool_lookup(
> + "CRYPTO_LARGE_MBUFPOOL");
> + if (ts_params->large_mbuf_pool == NULL) {
> + /* Not already created so create */
> + ts_params->large_mbuf_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create(
> + "CRYPTO_LARGE_MBUFPOOL",
> + 1, 0, 0, UINT16_MAX,
> + rte_socket_id());
> + if (ts_params->large_mbuf_pool == NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1,
> + "Can't create
> CRYPTO_LARGE_MBUFPOOL\n");
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> + }
> +
>   ts_params->op_mpool = rte_crypto_op_pool_create(
>   "MBUF_CRYPTO_SYM_OP_POOL",
>   RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC,
> @@ -5149,7 +5165,12 @@ test_AES_GMAC_authentication(const struct
> gmac_test_data *tdata)
>   if (retval < 0)
>   return retval;
> 
> - ut_params->ibuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(ts_params->mbuf_pool);
> + if (tdata->aad.len > MBUF_SIZE)
> + ut_params->ibuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(ts_params-
> >large_mbuf_pool);
> + else
> + ut_params->ibuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(ts_params-
> >mbuf_pool);
> + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->ibuf,
> + "Failed to allocate input buffer in mempool");
> 
>   memset(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(ut_params->ibuf, uint8_t *), 0,
>   rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(ut_params->ibuf));
> @@ -5233,7 +5254,12 @@ test_AES_GMAC_authentication_verify(const
> struct gmac_test_data *tdata)
>   if (retval < 0)
>   return retval;
> 
> - ut_params->ibuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(ts_params->mbuf_pool);
> + if (tdata->aad.len > MBUF_SIZE)
> + ut_params->ibuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(ts_params-
> >large_mbuf_pool);
> + else
> + ut_params->ibuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(ts_params-
> >mbuf_pool);
> + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->ibuf,
> + "Failed to allocate input buffer in mempool");
> 
>   memset(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(ut_params->ibuf, uint8_t *), 0,
>   rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(ut_params->ibuf));
> --
> 1.7.9.5

Acked-by: Michal Jastrzebski 


[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix crypto mbuf pool size

2016-10-11 Thread Piotr Azarewicz
This patch fix that created pool for crypto mbufs may be too big in some
environments.
To avoid the issue, mbuf pool is reverted to its previous size.
Moreover, here is added additional small pool with one large mbuf, what
is needed in large data test scenarios.

Fixes: ffbe3be0d4b5 ("app/test: add libcrypto")

Signed-off-by: Piotr Azarewicz 
---

v2 change:
- changed check if aad.len > MBUF_SIZE
- added assertion check for rte_pktmbuf_alloc

 app/test/test_cryptodev.c |   32 +---
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
index 2917454..7d03899 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static enum rte_cryptodev_type gbl_cryptodev_type;

 struct crypto_testsuite_params {
struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool;
+   struct rte_mempool *large_mbuf_pool;
struct rte_mempool *op_mpool;
struct rte_cryptodev_config conf;
struct rte_cryptodev_qp_conf qp_conf;
@@ -169,7 +170,7 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
/* Not already created so create */
ts_params->mbuf_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create(
"CRYPTO_MBUFPOOL",
-   NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE, 0, UINT16_MAX,
+   NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE, 0, MBUF_SIZE,
rte_socket_id());
if (ts_params->mbuf_pool == NULL) {
RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Can't create CRYPTO_MBUFPOOL\n");
@@ -177,6 +178,21 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
}
}

+   ts_params->large_mbuf_pool = rte_mempool_lookup(
+   "CRYPTO_LARGE_MBUFPOOL");
+   if (ts_params->large_mbuf_pool == NULL) {
+   /* Not already created so create */
+   ts_params->large_mbuf_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create(
+   "CRYPTO_LARGE_MBUFPOOL",
+   1, 0, 0, UINT16_MAX,
+   rte_socket_id());
+   if (ts_params->large_mbuf_pool == NULL) {
+   RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1,
+   "Can't create CRYPTO_LARGE_MBUFPOOL\n");
+   return TEST_FAILED;
+   }
+   }
+
ts_params->op_mpool = rte_crypto_op_pool_create(
"MBUF_CRYPTO_SYM_OP_POOL",
RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC,
@@ -5149,7 +5165,12 @@ test_AES_GMAC_authentication(const struct gmac_test_data 
*tdata)
if (retval < 0)
return retval;

-   ut_params->ibuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(ts_params->mbuf_pool);
+   if (tdata->aad.len > MBUF_SIZE)
+   ut_params->ibuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(ts_params->large_mbuf_pool);
+   else
+   ut_params->ibuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(ts_params->mbuf_pool);
+   TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->ibuf,
+   "Failed to allocate input buffer in mempool");

memset(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(ut_params->ibuf, uint8_t *), 0,
rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(ut_params->ibuf));
@@ -5233,7 +5254,12 @@ test_AES_GMAC_authentication_verify(const struct 
gmac_test_data *tdata)
if (retval < 0)
return retval;

-   ut_params->ibuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(ts_params->mbuf_pool);
+   if (tdata->aad.len > MBUF_SIZE)
+   ut_params->ibuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(ts_params->large_mbuf_pool);
+   else
+   ut_params->ibuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(ts_params->mbuf_pool);
+   TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->ibuf,
+   "Failed to allocate input buffer in mempool");

memset(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(ut_params->ibuf, uint8_t *), 0,
rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(ut_params->ibuf));
-- 
1.7.9.5