[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 20/20] eal: set log level from command line

2014-09-18 Thread David Marchand
Hello Neil,


On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Neil Horman  wrote:

>
> This is a nit, but since you're working in this code anyway, would you mind
> fixing the long options parsing please?  Instead of having a single case
> statement that just does a never ending if..else..if series of strcmps that
> could possibly cause a stack overflow, you can set the val value in the
> lgopts
> array to a unique value for each option and just have a set of case
> statements.
> It would look a lot more readable and exeucte more safely.
>

I agree, but I will send it in a different patchset: already made some
changes, it builds fine (at least on my linux), but I want to check it
actually works and maybe more cleanups can be done there (merging bsd and
linux code).

-- 
David Marchand


[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 20/20] eal: set log level from command line

2014-09-18 Thread Neil Horman
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:46:54AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Neil,
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Neil Horman  wrote:
> 
> >
> > This is a nit, but since you're working in this code anyway, would you mind
> > fixing the long options parsing please?  Instead of having a single case
> > statement that just does a never ending if..else..if series of strcmps that
> > could possibly cause a stack overflow, you can set the val value in the
> > lgopts
> > array to a unique value for each option and just have a set of case
> > statements.
> > It would look a lot more readable and exeucte more safely.
> >
> 
> I agree, but I will send it in a different patchset: already made some
> changes, it builds fine (at least on my linux), but I want to check it
> actually works and maybe more cleanups can be done there (merging bsd and
> linux code).
> 
Thats fine with me, thanks!
Neil

> -- 
> David Marchand


[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 20/20] eal: set log level from command line

2014-09-17 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 03:46:52PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Add a --log-level option to set the default eal log level.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand 
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson 
> ---
>  #else
> @@ -652,6 +679,18 @@ eal_parse_args(int argc, char **argv)
>   eal_usage(prgname);
>   return -1;
>   }
> + } else if (!strcmp(lgopts[option_index].name,
> +  OPT_LOG_LEVEL)) {
> + uint32_t log;
> +
> + if (eal_parse_log_level(optarg, ) < 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL,
> + "invalid parameters for --"
> + OPT_LOG_LEVEL "\n");
> + eal_usage(prgname);
> + return -1;
> + }
> + internal_config.log_level = log;


This is a nit, but since you're working in this code anyway, would you mind
fixing the long options parsing please?  Instead of having a single case
statement that just does a never ending if..else..if series of strcmps that
could possibly cause a stack overflow, you can set the val value in the lgopts
array to a unique value for each option and just have a set of case statements.
It would look a lot more readable and exeucte more safely.

Thanks
Neil