[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-05-06 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
Hi Stephen,

Kindly let me know if the multi-segment support for vmxnet3 pmd is already in, 
in a formal release of DPDK.
Or which formal release you are targeting this for.

Regards
-Prashant


-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Prashant Upadhyaya
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:42 PM
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Hi Stephen,

I believe the 1.6.0r2 is baking.
It would be great if you could enhance the vmxnet3 driver on the above with 
multi-segment support.
Any serious usecase ends up using multi-segment, so would be great if r2 can 
capture it.

Regards
-Prashant


-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Prashant Upadhyaya
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:57 AM
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Hi Stephen,

This is great news !
I can wait for a formal release of DPDK with your driver.
Please let me know when is the release expected. I will happily migrate to that.

Regards
-Prashant


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 9:21 PM
To: Prashant Upadhyaya
Cc: Srinivasan J; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:30:48 +0530
Prashant Upadhyaya  wrote:

> Hi Srini,
>
> Thanks, I could also make it work, thanks to your cue !
>
> Now then, this multi-segment not being supported in vmxnet3 driver is a big 
> party-pooper for me. Unfortunately in my usecase, I do indeed make heavy use 
> of multisegment buffers for sending out the data, so my usecase has failed 
> and I will have to fix that.
>
> Also, can you please adivse how much is the max data rates you have been able 
> to achieve with one vmxnet3 10G port.
>
> Thanks a lot for the advice once again.
>
> Regards
> -Prashant

I am integrating our driver with the 1.6.1 DPDK driver.
We support multi-segment, if you want I will backport that feature first.





===
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
===




===
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
===


"DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for 
the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or 
confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose 
other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error, 
please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, 
copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts 
no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information 
transmitted by this email including damage from virus."


[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-21 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
Hi Stephen,

I believe the 1.6.0r2 is baking.
It would be great if you could enhance the vmxnet3 driver on the above with 
multi-segment support.
Any serious usecase ends up using multi-segment, so would be great if r2 can 
capture it.

Regards
-Prashant


-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Prashant Upadhyaya
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:57 AM
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Hi Stephen,

This is great news !
I can wait for a formal release of DPDK with your driver.
Please let me know when is the release expected. I will happily migrate to that.

Regards
-Prashant


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 9:21 PM
To: Prashant Upadhyaya
Cc: Srinivasan J; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:30:48 +0530
Prashant Upadhyaya  wrote:

> Hi Srini,
>
> Thanks, I could also make it work, thanks to your cue !
>
> Now then, this multi-segment not being supported in vmxnet3 driver is a big 
> party-pooper for me. Unfortunately in my usecase, I do indeed make heavy use 
> of multisegment buffers for sending out the data, so my usecase has failed 
> and I will have to fix that.
>
> Also, can you please adivse how much is the max data rates you have been able 
> to achieve with one vmxnet3 10G port.
>
> Thanks a lot for the advice once again.
>
> Regards
> -Prashant

I am integrating our driver with the 1.6.1 DPDK driver.
We support multi-segment, if you want I will backport that feature first.





===
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
===




===
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
===


[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-11 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
Hi Stephen,

Can you please advise on your experience of the kind of data rates you have 
been able to achieve with vmxnet3.
Also did you have to do any special optimizations at the vmnic of ESXi for the 
above, kindly let me know.

Regards
-Prashant


-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Prashant Upadhyaya
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:57 AM
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Hi Stephen,

This is great news !
I can wait for a formal release of DPDK with your driver.
Please let me know when is the release expected. I will happily migrate to that.

Regards
-Prashant


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 9:21 PM
To: Prashant Upadhyaya
Cc: Srinivasan J; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:30:48 +0530
Prashant Upadhyaya  wrote:

> Hi Srini,
>
> Thanks, I could also make it work, thanks to your cue !
>
> Now then, this multi-segment not being supported in vmxnet3 driver is a big 
> party-pooper for me. Unfortunately in my usecase, I do indeed make heavy use 
> of multisegment buffers for sending out the data, so my usecase has failed 
> and I will have to fix that.
>
> Also, can you please adivse how much is the max data rates you have been able 
> to achieve with one vmxnet3 10G port.
>
> Thanks a lot for the advice once again.
>
> Regards
> -Prashant

I am integrating our driver with the 1.6.1 DPDK driver.
We support multi-segment, if you want I will backport that feature first.





===
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
===




===
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
===


[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-11 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
Hi Stephen,

This is great news !
I can wait for a formal release of DPDK with your driver.
Please let me know when is the release expected. I will happily migrate to that.

Regards
-Prashant


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 9:21 PM
To: Prashant Upadhyaya
Cc: Srinivasan J; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:30:48 +0530
Prashant Upadhyaya  wrote:

> Hi Srini,
>
> Thanks, I could also make it work, thanks to your cue !
>
> Now then, this multi-segment not being supported in vmxnet3 driver is a big 
> party-pooper for me. Unfortunately in my usecase, I do indeed make heavy use 
> of multisegment buffers for sending out the data, so my usecase has failed 
> and I will have to fix that.
>
> Also, can you please adivse how much is the max data rates you have been able 
> to achieve with one vmxnet3 10G port.
>
> Thanks a lot for the advice once again.
>
> Regards
> -Prashant

I am integrating our driver with the 1.6.1 DPDK driver.
We support multi-segment, if you want I will backport that feature first.





===
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
===


[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-10 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
Hi,

Regarding performance with vmxnet3 driver, the programmer's guide says thus --

"
Currently, the driver provides basic support for using the device in an 
Intel(r) DPDK
application running on a guest OS. Optimization is needed on the backend, that 
is, the
VMware* ESXi vmkernel switch, to achieve optimal performance end-to-end.
"

Can someone advise what are the techniques of 'backend optimization on the 
vmkernel switch'

I ran some initial tests without any attempt for above optimization and the 
data rates I am achieving with vmxnet3 are not very encouraging.

Regards
-Prashant



-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Prashant Upadhyaya
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 1:31 PM
To: Srinivasan J
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Hi Srini,

Thanks, I could also make it work, thanks to your cue !

Now then, this multi-segment not being supported in vmxnet3 driver is a big 
party-pooper for me. Unfortunately in my usecase, I do indeed make heavy use of 
multisegment buffers for sending out the data, so my usecase has failed and I 
will have to fix that.

Also, can you please adivse how much is the max data rates you have been able 
to achieve with one vmxnet3 10G port.

Thanks a lot for the advice once again.

Regards
-Prashant


-Original Message-
From: Srinivasan J [mailto:srinid...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 12:38 AM
To: Prashant Upadhyaya
Cc: David Marchand; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Prashant,
 I was also able to hit the issue your hitting using Esxi
5.1.0 evaluation and Fedora 20 X86_64 guest. I was able to fix the issue by 
setting CONFIG_RTE_EAL_UNBIND_PORTS=y option in 
defconfig_x86_64-default-linuxapp-gcc configuration file.

Issue seen


EAL: PCI device :03:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
EAL:   probe driver: 15ad:7b0 rte_vmxnet3_pmd
EAL:   Device is blacklisted, not initializing
EAL: PCI device :0b:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
EAL:   probe driver: 15ad:7b0 rte_vmxnet3_pmd

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
eth_vmxnet3_dev_init (eth_drv=, eth_dev=0x754480
) at
/root/source/dpdk-1.6.0r1/lib/librte_pmd_vmxnet3/vmxnet3_ethdev.c:218
218 ver = VMXNET3_READ_BAR1_REG(hw, VMXNET3_REG_VRRS);
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.18-11.fc20.x86_64
(gdb) p hw
$1 = (struct vmxnet3_hw *) 0x7fffd8fc1040
(gdb) p *hw
$2 = {hw_addr0 = 0x0, hw_addr1 = 0x0, back = 0x0, device_id = 1968, vendor_id = 
5549, subsystem_device_id = 0, subsystem_vendor_id = 0,
  adapter_stopped = 0, perm_addr = "\000\000\000\000\000", num_tx_queues = 1 
'\001', num_rx_queues = 1 '\001', bufs_per_pkt = 1 '\001', cur_mtu = 0,
  tqd_start = 0x0, rqd_start = 0x0, shared = 0x0, sharedPA = 0, queueDescPA = 
0, queue_desc_len = 0, rss_conf = 0x0, rss_confPA = 0, mf_table = 0x0}
(gdb)

#define VMXNET3_PCI_BAR1_REG_ADDR(hw, reg) \
((volatile uint32_t *)((char *)(hw)->hw_addr1 + (reg))) #define 
VMXNET3_READ_BAR1_REG(hw, reg) \
vmxnet3_read_addr(VMXNET3_PCI_BAR1_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))) 
lib/librte_pmd_vmxnet3/vmxnet3_ethdev.h

Issue not seen after enabling CONFIG_RTE_EAL_UNBIND_PORTS=y 
==

[root at localhost build]# ./l2fwd -c 0xf -b :03:00.0 -n 1 -- -p 0x6
EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 1 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 2 as core 2 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 3 as core 3 on socket 0
EAL: Skip lcore 4 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 5 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 6 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 7 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 8 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 9 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 10 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 11 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 12 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 13 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 14 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 15 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 16 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 17 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 18 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 19 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 20 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 21 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 22 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 23 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 24 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 25 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 26 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 27 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 28 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 29 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 30 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 31 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 32 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 33 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 34 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 35 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 36 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 37 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 38 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 39 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 40 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 41 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 42 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 43 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore

[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-10 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
Hi Srini,

Thanks, I could also make it work, thanks to your cue !

Now then, this multi-segment not being supported in vmxnet3 driver is a big 
party-pooper for me. Unfortunately in my usecase, I do indeed make heavy use of 
multisegment buffers for sending out the data, so my usecase has failed and I 
will have to fix that.

Also, can you please adivse how much is the max data rates you have been able 
to achieve with one vmxnet3 10G port.

Thanks a lot for the advice once again.

Regards
-Prashant


-Original Message-
From: Srinivasan J [mailto:srinid...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 12:38 AM
To: Prashant Upadhyaya
Cc: David Marchand; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Prashant,
 I was also able to hit the issue your hitting using Esxi
5.1.0 evaluation and Fedora 20 X86_64 guest. I was able to fix the issue by 
setting CONFIG_RTE_EAL_UNBIND_PORTS=y option in 
defconfig_x86_64-default-linuxapp-gcc configuration file.

Issue seen


EAL: PCI device :03:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
EAL:   probe driver: 15ad:7b0 rte_vmxnet3_pmd
EAL:   Device is blacklisted, not initializing
EAL: PCI device :0b:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
EAL:   probe driver: 15ad:7b0 rte_vmxnet3_pmd

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
eth_vmxnet3_dev_init (eth_drv=, eth_dev=0x754480
) at
/root/source/dpdk-1.6.0r1/lib/librte_pmd_vmxnet3/vmxnet3_ethdev.c:218
218 ver = VMXNET3_READ_BAR1_REG(hw, VMXNET3_REG_VRRS);
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.18-11.fc20.x86_64
(gdb) p hw
$1 = (struct vmxnet3_hw *) 0x7fffd8fc1040
(gdb) p *hw
$2 = {hw_addr0 = 0x0, hw_addr1 = 0x0, back = 0x0, device_id = 1968, vendor_id = 
5549, subsystem_device_id = 0, subsystem_vendor_id = 0,
  adapter_stopped = 0, perm_addr = "\000\000\000\000\000", num_tx_queues = 1 
'\001', num_rx_queues = 1 '\001', bufs_per_pkt = 1 '\001', cur_mtu = 0,
  tqd_start = 0x0, rqd_start = 0x0, shared = 0x0, sharedPA = 0, queueDescPA = 
0, queue_desc_len = 0, rss_conf = 0x0, rss_confPA = 0, mf_table = 0x0}
(gdb)

#define VMXNET3_PCI_BAR1_REG_ADDR(hw, reg) \
((volatile uint32_t *)((char *)(hw)->hw_addr1 + (reg))) #define 
VMXNET3_READ_BAR1_REG(hw, reg) \
vmxnet3_read_addr(VMXNET3_PCI_BAR1_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))) 
lib/librte_pmd_vmxnet3/vmxnet3_ethdev.h

Issue not seen after enabling CONFIG_RTE_EAL_UNBIND_PORTS=y 
==

[root at localhost build]# ./l2fwd -c 0xf -b :03:00.0 -n 1 -- -p 0x6
EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 1 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 2 as core 2 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 3 as core 3 on socket 0
EAL: Skip lcore 4 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 5 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 6 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 7 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 8 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 9 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 10 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 11 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 12 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 13 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 14 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 15 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 16 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 17 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 18 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 19 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 20 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 21 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 22 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 23 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 24 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 25 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 26 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 27 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 28 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 29 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 30 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 31 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 32 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 33 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 34 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 35 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 36 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 37 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 38 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 39 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 40 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 41 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 42 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 43 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 44 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 45 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 46 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 47 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 48 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 49 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 50 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 51 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 52 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 53 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 54 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 55 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 56 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 57 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 58 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 59 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 60 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 61 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 62 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 63 (not detected)
EAL: Setting up memory...
EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x20 bytes
EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7f3a76a0 (size = 0x20)
EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x7c0 bytes
EAL: Virtual area found at 0

[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-10 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:30:48 +0530
Prashant Upadhyaya  wrote:

> Hi Srini,
> 
> Thanks, I could also make it work, thanks to your cue !
> 
> Now then, this multi-segment not being supported in vmxnet3 driver is a big 
> party-pooper for me. Unfortunately in my usecase, I do indeed make heavy use 
> of multisegment buffers for sending out the data, so my usecase has failed 
> and I will have to fix that.
> 
> Also, can you please adivse how much is the max data rates you have been able 
> to achieve with one vmxnet3 10G port.
> 
> Thanks a lot for the advice once again.
> 
> Regards
> -Prashant

I am integrating our driver with the 1.6.1 DPDK driver.
We support multi-segment, if you want I will backport that feature first.



[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-09 Thread Srinivasan J
:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
EAL:   probe driver: 15ad:7b0 rte_vmxnet3_pmd
EAL:   PCI memory mapped at 0x7f3a76d0c000
EAL:   PCI memory mapped at 0x7f3a76d0b000
EAL:   PCI memory mapped at 0x7f3a76d09000
Notice: odd number of ports in portmask.
Lcore 0: RX port 1
Skipping disabled port 0
Initializing port 1... done:
Port 1, MAC address: 00:0C:29:F1:9D:A4


Checking link statusdone
Port 1 Link Up - speed 1 Mbps - full-duplex
L2FWD: lcore 1 has nothing to do
L2FWD: lcore 2 has nothing to do
L2FWD: lcore 3 has nothing to do
L2FWD: entering main loop on lcore 0
L2FWD:  -- lcoreid=0 portid=1

Port statistics 
Statistics for port 1 --
Packets sent:0
Packets received:0
Packets dropped: 0
Statistics for port 2 --
Packets sent:0
Packets received:0
Packets dropped: 0
Aggregate statistics ===
Total packets sent:  0
Total packets received:  0
Total packets dropped:   0





On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Prashant Upadhyaya
 wrote:
> Hi Srini,
>
> Yes, I am still stuck, I am using ESXi5.1 though and Fedora18 in Guest.
> Please let me know what is the guest OS distro you are using in the VM. I'll 
> try with that once.
>
> Regards
> -Prashant
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Srinivasan J [mailto:srinidpdk at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 9:08 AM
> To: Prashant Upadhyaya
> Cc: David Marchand; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?
>
> Prashant,
>  Are you still hitting a crash? Do you have hugetlbfs enabled? if 
> not try adding enabling hugetlbfs. I was able to get
> vxnet3 up using the vmxnet3 pmd alone in DPDK 1.60r1. I did not use the 
> vmxnet3-usermap kernel driver. I am using Esxi 5.5
>
> Eg: echo 1024 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages; mkdir /huge; mount -t hugetlbfs 
> nodev /huge;
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya  aricent.com> wrote:
>> And if it is any help, here is the startup log --
>>
>> EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0
>> EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 1 on socket 0
>> EAL: Detected lcore 2 as core 2 on socket 0
>> EAL: Detected lcore 3 as core 3 on socket 0
>> EAL: Detected lcore 4 as core 4 on socket 0
>> EAL: Detected lcore 5 as core 5 on socket 0
>> EAL: Detected lcore 6 as core 6 on socket 0
>> EAL: Detected lcore 7 as core 7 on socket 0
>> EAL: Skip lcore 8 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 9 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 10 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 11 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 12 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 13 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 14 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 15 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 16 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 17 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 18 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 19 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 20 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 21 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 22 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 23 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 24 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 25 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 26 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 27 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 28 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 29 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 30 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 31 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 32 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 33 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 34 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 35 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 36 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 37 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 38 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 39 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 40 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 41 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 42 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 43 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 44 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 45 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 46 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 47 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 48 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 49 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 50 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 51 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 52 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 53 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 54 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 55 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 56 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 57 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 58 (not detected)
>> EAL: Skip lcore 59 (no

[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-07 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
Hi Srini,

Yes, I am still stuck, I am using ESXi5.1 though and Fedora18 in Guest.
Please let me know what is the guest OS distro you are using in the VM. I'll 
try with that once.

Regards
-Prashant


-Original Message-
From: Srinivasan J [mailto:srinid...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 9:08 AM
To: Prashant Upadhyaya
Cc: David Marchand; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Prashant,
 Are you still hitting a crash? Do you have hugetlbfs enabled? if 
not try adding enabling hugetlbfs. I was able to get
vxnet3 up using the vmxnet3 pmd alone in DPDK 1.60r1. I did not use the 
vmxnet3-usermap kernel driver. I am using Esxi 5.5

Eg: echo 1024 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages; mkdir /huge; mount -t hugetlbfs 
nodev /huge;

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya  wrote:
> And if it is any help, here is the startup log --
>
> EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 1 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 2 as core 2 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 3 as core 3 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 4 as core 4 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 5 as core 5 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 6 as core 6 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 7 as core 7 on socket 0
> EAL: Skip lcore 8 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 9 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 10 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 11 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 12 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 13 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 14 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 15 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 16 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 17 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 18 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 19 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 20 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 21 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 22 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 23 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 24 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 25 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 26 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 27 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 28 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 29 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 30 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 31 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 32 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 33 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 34 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 35 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 36 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 37 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 38 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 39 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 40 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 41 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 42 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 43 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 44 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 45 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 46 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 47 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 48 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 49 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 50 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 51 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 52 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 53 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 54 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 55 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 56 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 57 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 58 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 59 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 60 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 61 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 62 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 63 (not detected)
> EAL: Setting up memory...
> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x8000 bytes
> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7f848ae0 (size = 0x8000)
> EAL: Requesting 1024 pages of size 2MB from socket 0
> EAL: TSC frequency is ~200 KHz
> EAL: Master core 0 is ready (tid=b3f3f00)
> EAL: Core 1 is ready (tid=8a1f2700)
> EAL: Core 2 is ready (tid=899f1700)
> EAL: Core 3 is ready (tid=891f0700)
> EAL: Core 4 is ready (tid=889ef700)
> EAL: Core 5 is ready (tid=7bfff700)
> EAL: Core 6 is ready (tid=7b7fe700)
> EAL: Core 7 is ready (tid=7affd700)
> Pool initialized
> Global Variables initialized
> PMD: rte_vmxnet3_pmd_init():  >>
> EAL: PCI device :0b:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
> EAL:   probe driver: 15ad:7b0 rte_vmxnet3_pmd
> PMD: eth_vmxnet3_dev_init():  >>
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Prashant
> Upadhyaya
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 12:20 PM
> To: David Marchand
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?
>
> Hi,
>
> Some further update on the crash I am facing.
> I am using DPDK1.6.0r1 and take over the vmxnet3 with igb_uio and then
> start the application. (so no external ko or vmxnet usermap etc.)
> During the port initializations, the crash is happening in the
> following function -
>
> eth_vmxne

[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-07 Thread Srinivasan J
Prashant,
 Are you still hitting a crash? Do you have hugetlbfs
enabled? if not try adding enabling hugetlbfs. I was able to get
vxnet3 up using the vmxnet3 pmd alone in DPDK 1.60r1. I did not use
the vmxnet3-usermap kernel driver. I am using Esxi 5.5

Eg: echo 1024 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages; mkdir /huge; mount -t
hugetlbfs nodev /huge;

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya
 wrote:
> And if it is any help, here is the startup log --
>
> EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 1 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 2 as core 2 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 3 as core 3 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 4 as core 4 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 5 as core 5 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 6 as core 6 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 7 as core 7 on socket 0
> EAL: Skip lcore 8 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 9 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 10 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 11 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 12 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 13 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 14 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 15 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 16 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 17 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 18 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 19 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 20 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 21 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 22 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 23 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 24 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 25 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 26 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 27 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 28 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 29 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 30 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 31 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 32 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 33 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 34 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 35 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 36 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 37 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 38 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 39 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 40 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 41 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 42 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 43 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 44 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 45 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 46 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 47 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 48 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 49 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 50 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 51 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 52 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 53 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 54 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 55 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 56 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 57 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 58 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 59 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 60 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 61 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 62 (not detected)
> EAL: Skip lcore 63 (not detected)
> EAL: Setting up memory...
> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x8000 bytes
> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7f848ae0 (size = 0x8000)
> EAL: Requesting 1024 pages of size 2MB from socket 0
> EAL: TSC frequency is ~200 KHz
> EAL: Master core 0 is ready (tid=b3f3f00)
> EAL: Core 1 is ready (tid=8a1f2700)
> EAL: Core 2 is ready (tid=899f1700)
> EAL: Core 3 is ready (tid=891f0700)
> EAL: Core 4 is ready (tid=889ef700)
> EAL: Core 5 is ready (tid=7bfff700)
> EAL: Core 6 is ready (tid=7b7fe700)
> EAL: Core 7 is ready (tid=7affd700)
> Pool initialized
> Global Variables initialized
> PMD: rte_vmxnet3_pmd_init():  >>
> EAL: PCI device :0b:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
> EAL:   probe driver: 15ad:7b0 rte_vmxnet3_pmd
> PMD: eth_vmxnet3_dev_init():  >>
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Prashant Upadhyaya
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 12:20 PM
> To: David Marchand
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?
>
> Hi,
>
> Some further update on the crash I am facing.
> I am using DPDK1.6.0r1 and take over the vmxnet3 with igb_uio and then start 
> the application. (so no external ko or vmxnet usermap etc.) During the port 
> initializations, the crash is happening in the following function -
>
> eth_vmxnet3_dev_init
>
> and the crash is happening at the following line -
> /* Check h/w version compatibility with driver. */
> ver = VMXNET3_READ_BAR1_REG(hw, VMXNET3_REG_VRRS);
>
> Any hints regarding what could be wrong ?
>
> Regards
> -Prashant
>
>
> From: Prashant Upadhyaya
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 9:01 PM
> To: 'David Marchand'
> Cc: Srinivasan J; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Whi

[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-06 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
And if it is any help, here is the startup log --

EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 1 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 2 as core 2 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 3 as core 3 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 4 as core 4 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 5 as core 5 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 6 as core 6 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 7 as core 7 on socket 0
EAL: Skip lcore 8 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 9 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 10 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 11 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 12 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 13 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 14 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 15 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 16 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 17 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 18 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 19 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 20 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 21 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 22 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 23 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 24 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 25 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 26 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 27 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 28 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 29 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 30 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 31 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 32 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 33 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 34 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 35 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 36 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 37 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 38 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 39 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 40 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 41 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 42 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 43 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 44 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 45 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 46 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 47 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 48 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 49 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 50 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 51 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 52 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 53 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 54 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 55 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 56 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 57 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 58 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 59 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 60 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 61 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 62 (not detected)
EAL: Skip lcore 63 (not detected)
EAL: Setting up memory...
EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x8000 bytes
EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7f848ae0 (size = 0x8000)
EAL: Requesting 1024 pages of size 2MB from socket 0
EAL: TSC frequency is ~200 KHz
EAL: Master core 0 is ready (tid=b3f3f00)
EAL: Core 1 is ready (tid=8a1f2700)
EAL: Core 2 is ready (tid=899f1700)
EAL: Core 3 is ready (tid=891f0700)
EAL: Core 4 is ready (tid=889ef700)
EAL: Core 5 is ready (tid=7bfff700)
EAL: Core 6 is ready (tid=7b7fe700)
EAL: Core 7 is ready (tid=7affd700)
Pool initialized
Global Variables initialized
PMD: rte_vmxnet3_pmd_init():  >>
EAL: PCI device :0b:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
EAL:   probe driver: 15ad:7b0 rte_vmxnet3_pmd
PMD: eth_vmxnet3_dev_init():  >>
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Prashant Upadhyaya
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 12:20 PM
To: David Marchand
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Hi,

Some further update on the crash I am facing.
I am using DPDK1.6.0r1 and take over the vmxnet3 with igb_uio and then start 
the application. (so no external ko or vmxnet usermap etc.) During the port 
initializations, the crash is happening in the following function -

eth_vmxnet3_dev_init

and the crash is happening at the following line -
/* Check h/w version compatibility with driver. */
ver = VMXNET3_READ_BAR1_REG(hw, VMXNET3_REG_VRRS);

Any hints regarding what could be wrong ?

Regards
-Prashant


From: Prashant Upadhyaya
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 9:01 PM
To: 'David Marchand'
Cc: Srinivasan J; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Hi David,

The compilation error with debug flags on was that the functions -- 
vmxnet3_txq_dump, vmxnet3_rxq_dump - are defined but not used.
Not a serious error, I will try to get rid of the compiler flag which generates 
this.

However, I must reiterate, I _did_ bind my vmxnet3 device with igb_uio (and I 
did not use any .so, because I was intending to use the builtin vmxnet3 driver 
of dpdk 1.6.0r1), the bind succeeded, but then when I started the application, 
the dev init for vmxnet3 gave a core dump.
Your patch and solution seems to be suggesting the reverse, i.e. when I don't 
bind with igb_uio but try to use the native driver. So please do try the above 
combination as well.

Regards
-Prashant


From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 8:41 PM
To: Prashant Upadhyaya
Cc: Srinivasan J; dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be us

[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-06 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
Hi,

Some further update on the crash I am facing.
I am using DPDK1.6.0r1 and take over the vmxnet3 with igb_uio and then start 
the application. (so no external ko or vmxnet usermap etc.)
During the port initializations, the crash is happening in the following 
function -

eth_vmxnet3_dev_init

and the crash is happening at the following line -
/* Check h/w version compatibility with driver. */
ver = VMXNET3_READ_BAR1_REG(hw, VMXNET3_REG_VRRS);

Any hints regarding what could be wrong ?

Regards
-Prashant


From: Prashant Upadhyaya
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 9:01 PM
To: 'David Marchand'
Cc: Srinivasan J; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Hi David,

The compilation error with debug flags on was that the functions -- 
vmxnet3_txq_dump, vmxnet3_rxq_dump - are defined but not used.
Not a serious error, I will try to get rid of the compiler flag which generates 
this.

However, I must reiterate, I _did_ bind my vmxnet3 device with igb_uio (and I 
did not use any .so, because I was intending to use the builtin vmxnet3 driver 
of dpdk 1.6.0r1), the bind succeeded, but then when I started the application, 
the dev init for vmxnet3 gave a core dump.
Your patch and solution seems to be suggesting the reverse, i.e. when I don't 
bind with igb_uio but try to use the native driver. So please do try the above 
combination as well.

Regards
-Prashant


From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 8:41 PM
To: Prashant Upadhyaya
Cc: Srinivasan J; dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Hello Prashant,

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya mailto:prashant.upadhyaya at aricent.com>> wrote:
Hi,

I am also keen to know the answer to the question posted by Srini.
The real question is -- is dpdk1.6.0r1 self-sufficient so that I don't need any 
extensions etc., or do I still need something from outside like the usermap 
kernel driver etc.

Secondly, if I turn on all the debug options for the vmxnet3 pmd in the config 
file, 1.6.0r1 compilation runs into a problem and reports a function which is 
defined but not used.

Can you send your build error ? (maybe in a separate thread ?)


I am trying to bring up DPDK inside Fedora18 Guest on ESXi -- when I used 
DPDK1.6.0r1 (without debug options turned on for vmxnet3 pmd) the igb_uio could 
take over the vmxnet3 NIC but I encountered a core dump in the dev init 
function for the vmxnet3 driver -- anybody encountered a similar issue ?

I encountered these problems as well.

- igb_uio module does not check if you disable vmxnet3-uio pmds, it will always 
try to take over vmxnet3 devices.
I have a patch waiting in my working dir to cleanly disable vmxnet3-uio pmd.

- If you don't bind vmxnet3 devices to uio, but forget to enable 
vmxnet3-usermap pmd (by specifiying -d librte_pmd_vmxnet3.so), then internal 
vmxnet3-uio pmd will try to initialise and crash.
I did not look any deeper into this, the easiest way is to disable vmxnet3-uio 
pmd + apply the patch I will send in a few minutes, as a first workaround.


Regards,
--
David Marchand




===
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
===


[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-05 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
Hi David,

The compilation error with debug flags on was that the functions -- 
vmxnet3_txq_dump, vmxnet3_rxq_dump - are defined but not used.
Not a serious error, I will try to get rid of the compiler flag which generates 
this.

However, I must reiterate, I _did_ bind my vmxnet3 device with igb_uio (and I 
did not use any .so, because I was intending to use the builtin vmxnet3 driver 
of dpdk 1.6.0r1), the bind succeeded, but then when I started the application, 
the dev init for vmxnet3 gave a core dump.
Your patch and solution seems to be suggesting the reverse, i.e. when I don't 
bind with igb_uio but try to use the native driver. So please do try the above 
combination as well.

Regards
-Prashant


From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 8:41 PM
To: Prashant Upadhyaya
Cc: Srinivasan J; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

Hello Prashant,

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya mailto:prashant.upadhyaya at aricent.com>> wrote:
Hi,

I am also keen to know the answer to the question posted by Srini.
The real question is -- is dpdk1.6.0r1 self-sufficient so that I don't need any 
extensions etc., or do I still need something from outside like the usermap 
kernel driver etc.

Secondly, if I turn on all the debug options for the vmxnet3 pmd in the config 
file, 1.6.0r1 compilation runs into a problem and reports a function which is 
defined but not used.

Can you send your build error ? (maybe in a separate thread ?)


I am trying to bring up DPDK inside Fedora18 Guest on ESXi -- when I used 
DPDK1.6.0r1 (without debug options turned on for vmxnet3 pmd) the igb_uio could 
take over the vmxnet3 NIC but I encountered a core dump in the dev init 
function for the vmxnet3 driver -- anybody encountered a similar issue ?

I encountered these problems as well.

- igb_uio module does not check if you disable vmxnet3-uio pmds, it will always 
try to take over vmxnet3 devices.
I have a patch waiting in my working dir to cleanly disable vmxnet3-uio pmd.

- If you don't bind vmxnet3 devices to uio, but forget to enable 
vmxnet3-usermap pmd (by specifiying -d librte_pmd_vmxnet3.so), then internal 
vmxnet3-uio pmd will try to initialise and crash.
I did not look any deeper into this, the easiest way is to disable vmxnet3-uio 
pmd + apply the patch I will send in a few minutes, as a first workaround.


Regards,
--
David Marchand




===
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
===


[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-05 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
Hi,

I am also keen to know the answer to the question posted by Srini.
The real question is -- is dpdk1.6.0r1 self-sufficient so that I don't need any 
extensions etc., or do I still need something from outside like the usermap 
kernel driver etc.

Secondly, if I turn on all the debug options for the vmxnet3 pmd in the config 
file, 1.6.0r1 compilation runs into a problem and reports a function which is 
defined but not used.

I am trying to bring up DPDK inside Fedora18 Guest on ESXi -- when I used 
DPDK1.6.0r1 (without debug options turned on for vmxnet3 pmd) the igb_uio could 
take over the vmxnet3 NIC but I encountered a core dump in the dev init 
function for the vmxnet3 driver -- anybody encountered a similar issue ?

Regards
-Prashant

-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Srinivasan J
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 8:53 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

I want to try dpdk with vmxnet3 in Vmware Esxi 5.1. I see that the latest dpdk 
1.6.0r1 includes a vmxnet3 pmd. The vmxnet3-usermap-1.1.tar.gz as well includes 
a vmxnet3 pmd driver.

I'm confused as to which vmxnet3 pmd driver to use along with which
vmxnet3 kernel driver (vmxnet3 native kernel driver or vmxnet3-usermap kernel 
driver). I also want to try RSS with vmxnet3 and dpdk. As per Intel DPDK 
Programmer's Guide (January 2014) RSS is supported with
vmxnet3 since dpdk version 1.6.0.

Thanks,
Srini




===
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
===


[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-05 Thread David Marchand
Hello Prashant,

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya <
prashant.upadhyaya at aricent.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am also keen to know the answer to the question posted by Srini.
> The real question is -- is dpdk1.6.0r1 self-sufficient so that I don't
> need any extensions etc., or do I still need something from outside like
> the usermap kernel driver etc.
>
> Secondly, if I turn on all the debug options for the vmxnet3 pmd in the
> config file, 1.6.0r1 compilation runs into a problem and reports a function
> which is defined but not used.
>

Can you send your build error ? (maybe in a separate thread ?)


> I am trying to bring up DPDK inside Fedora18 Guest on ESXi -- when I used
> DPDK1.6.0r1 (without debug options turned on for vmxnet3 pmd) the igb_uio
> could take over the vmxnet3 NIC but I encountered a core dump in the dev
> init function for the vmxnet3 driver -- anybody encountered a similar issue
> ?
>

I encountered these problems as well.

- igb_uio module does not check if you disable vmxnet3-uio pmds, it will
always try to take over vmxnet3 devices.
I have a patch waiting in my working dir to cleanly disable vmxnet3-uio pmd.

- If you don't bind vmxnet3 devices to uio, but forget to enable
vmxnet3-usermap pmd (by specifiying -d librte_pmd_vmxnet3.so), then
internal vmxnet3-uio pmd will try to initialise and crash.
I did not look any deeper into this, the easiest way is to disable
vmxnet3-uio pmd + apply the patch I will send in a few minutes, as a first
workaround.


Regards,
-- 
David Marchand


[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-05 Thread David Marchand
Hello,

I would say the main advantage is the fact that vmxnet3-usermap does not
require uio.


Regards,
-- 
David Marchand


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Srinivasan J  wrote:

> I want to try dpdk with vmxnet3 in Vmware Esxi 5.1. I see that the
> latest dpdk 1.6.0r1 includes a vmxnet3 pmd. The
> vmxnet3-usermap-1.1.tar.gz as well includes a vmxnet3 pmd driver.
>
> I'm confused as to which vmxnet3 pmd driver to use along with which
> vmxnet3 kernel driver (vmxnet3 native kernel driver or vmxnet3-usermap
> kernel driver). I also want to try RSS with vmxnet3 and dpdk. As per
> Intel DPDK Programmer's Guide (January 2014) RSS is supported with
> vmxnet3 since dpdk version 1.6.0.
>
> Thanks,
> Srini
>


[dpdk-dev] Which vmxnet3 pmd is to be used in dpdk 1.6.x?

2014-03-04 Thread Srinivasan J
I want to try dpdk with vmxnet3 in Vmware Esxi 5.1. I see that the
latest dpdk 1.6.0r1 includes a vmxnet3 pmd. The
vmxnet3-usermap-1.1.tar.gz as well includes a vmxnet3 pmd driver.

I'm confused as to which vmxnet3 pmd driver to use along with which
vmxnet3 kernel driver (vmxnet3 native kernel driver or vmxnet3-usermap
kernel driver). I also want to try RSS with vmxnet3 and dpdk. As per
Intel DPDK Programmer's Guide (January 2014) RSS is supported with
vmxnet3 since dpdk version 1.6.0.

Thanks,
Srini