Re: [Discussion] Which released version for the bugfix of Dubbo Spring Boot

2019-02-24 Thread Mercy

Here is a sample code to bugfix Enviroment Beans conflict:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project/issues/459

Kind regards,

Mercy Ma

在 2019/2/25 上午11:37, Mercy 写道:

Yes, it is. What's your opinion?

Kind regards,

Mercy

在 2019/2/25 上午11:20, jun liu 写道:
Is it the same issue as I asked you personally last week, Spring 
Environment injection conflict because of duplicate ambiguous instances?


Re: [Discussion] Which released version for the bugfix of Dubbo Spring Boot

2019-02-24 Thread Mercy

Yes, it is. What's your opinion?

Kind regards,

Mercy

在 2019/2/25 上午11:20, jun liu 写道:

Is it the same issue as I asked you personally last week, Spring Environment 
injection conflict because of duplicate ambiguous instances?


Re: [Discussion] Which released version for the bugfix of Dubbo Spring Boot

2019-02-24 Thread jun liu
> Recently, Some developers found an serious flaw[1] in Dubbo Spring Boot 
> starter, thus it's required to release a new version to fix it. However, The 
> version of Dubbo Spring Boot is binding to Dubbo's, thus there are two 
> versions to be choosed :
> 
> 2.7.0.1
> 2.7.1
> I prefer 2.7.0.1, What's your option?
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project/issues/449 
> 
> 

Is it the same issue as I asked you personally last week, Spring Environment 
injection conflict because of duplicate ambiguous instances?

Jun

> On Feb 25, 2019, at 10:38 AM, Mercy  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Recently, Some developers found an serious flaw[1] in Dubbo Spring Boot 
> starter, thus it's required to release a new version to fix it. However, The 
> version of Dubbo Spring Boot is binding to Dubbo's, thus there are two 
> versions to be choosed :
> 
> 2.7.0.1
> 2.7.1
> I prefer 2.7.0.1, What's your option?
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project/issues/449 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Mercy Ma



Re: discuss dubbo support opentracing

2019-02-24 Thread Xiaoguang Ma
In image, result.hasException call future.get Xiaoguang Ma Apache 
ShardingSphere Signature is customized by Netease Mail Master On 02/25/2019 
10:26, Ian Luo wrote: Xiaoguang, Would you mind to provide us more infos on 
async call not working on zipkin plugin? You may consider to file an issue 
first where you can describe the issue better and provide the concrete steps to 
reproduce it. Thanks, -Ian. On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 5:54 PM Xiaoguang Ma 
 wrote: > async call not work in zipkin plugin. > 
zipkin plugin support dubbo2.7. > > can we talk about it > > > > Xiaoguang Ma > 
Apache ShardingSphere > > 
;
 > > Signature is customized by Netease Mail Master > 
; > > On 01/30/2019 17:22, 
Xiaoguang Ma  wrote: > Opentracing org already agree 
and promise to review. Now, I am doing in my > repository. Xiaoguang Ma Apache 
ShardingSphere Signature is customized by > Netease Mail Master On 01/30/2019 
14:50, Ian Luo wrote: Xiaoguang, You can > start your work in github.com/dubbo 
for now, then you can approach > opentracing org to check if they are willing 
to accept your work. I can > create a new project in dubbo group [1] for your 
experiment. Thanks, -Ian. > 1. github.com/dubbo On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:03 
AM Xiaoguang Ma < > maxiaogu...@apache.org> wrote: > Ok, I try to connect 
opentracing whether > I can push this in opentracing > repository or not > > Ma 
Xiaoguang > > Apache ShardingSphere > > > maxiaoguang  
> 于2019年1月30日周三 上午9:49写道: > > > Yes, zipkin and skywalking also support > 
opentracing. > > > > > > > > Ma Xiaoguang > > Apache ShardingSphere > > > > > < 
> > 
https://maas.mail.163.com/dashi-web-extend/html/proSignature.html?ftlId=2=Ma+Xiaoguang=maxiaoguang64%40gmail.com=Apache%C2%A0ShardingSphere=%5B%22%22%5D
 > > > > > > > Signature is customized by Netease Mail Master > > < > 
https://mail.163.com/dashi/dlpro.html?from=mail88;; > > > > On > 01/29/2019 
17:20, Yunkun Huang  wrote: > > Currently > there is a filter 
in brave to support integration with zipkin > > > > 
https://github.com/openzipkin/brave/tree/master/instrumentation/dubbo-rpc > > > 
> > But provide a integration with opentracing api directly, it may > give more 
> > choice for users. > > > > On 2019/01/29 08:39:52, Xiaoguang > Ma 
 wrote: > > > I find a issue #3209 < > > > 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/issues/3209; in > > > > github. > 
> > I have some experience in opentracing. > > > So I want to do > it. > > > I 
will provider a filter that implement > org.apache.dubbo.rpc.Filter and > > use 
> > > opentracing api. > > > Can i > do it? > > > > > > Xiaoguang Ma from 
ShardingSphere > > > > > > > > > > Huxing Zhang  
于2019年1月29日周二 下午4:13写道: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Would you please 
elaborate what you want to discuss > here? > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 
at 5:46 PM Ma Xiaoguang < > > maxiaoguan...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards! > > > > Huxing > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >

Re: [Discussion] Which released version for the bugfix of Dubbo Spring Boot

2019-02-24 Thread Mercy
In my opion, it's urgent. I'd like to vote this release as soon as 
possible and provide temporary solution before release.



Kind regards,

Mercy Ma

在 2019/2/25 上午10:43, Ian Luo 写道:

If it is urgent, I vote 2.7.0.1, otherwise I suggest we should hold the
release until Dubbo releases 2.7.1 by the end of March. In this way, we can
keep the release version constant between spring boot starter and dubbo.

Regards,
-Ian.


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:38 AM Mercy  wrote:


Hi all,

 Recently, Some developers found an serious flaw[1] in Dubbo Spring
Boot starter, thus it's required to release a new version to fix it.
However, The version of Dubbo Spring Boot is binding to Dubbo's, thus there
are two versions to be choosed :

- 2.7.0.1
- 2.7.1

I prefer 2.7.0.1, What's your option?

[1]:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project/issues/449

Kind regards,

Mercy Ma



Re: [Discussion] Which released version for the bugfix of Dubbo Spring Boot

2019-02-24 Thread Ian Luo
If it is urgent, I vote 2.7.0.1, otherwise I suggest we should hold the
release until Dubbo releases 2.7.1 by the end of March. In this way, we can
keep the release version constant between spring boot starter and dubbo.

Regards,
-Ian.


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:38 AM Mercy  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Recently, Some developers found an serious flaw[1] in Dubbo Spring
> Boot starter, thus it's required to release a new version to fix it.
> However, The version of Dubbo Spring Boot is binding to Dubbo's, thus there
> are two versions to be choosed :
>
>- 2.7.0.1
>- 2.7.1
>
> I prefer 2.7.0.1, What's your option?
>
> [1]:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project/issues/449
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Mercy Ma
>


[Discussion] Which released version for the bugfix of Dubbo Spring Boot

2019-02-24 Thread Mercy

Hi all,

    Recently, Some developers found an serious flaw[1] in Dubbo Spring 
Boot starter, thus it's required to release a new version to fix it. 
However, The version of Dubbo Spring Boot is binding to Dubbo's, thus 
there are two versions to be choosed :


 * 2.7.0.1
 * 2.7.1

I prefer 2.7.0.1, What's your option?

[1]: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project/issues/449


Kind regards,

Mercy Ma



Re: [ANN] New PPMC member: Yunkun Huang

2019-02-24 Thread Ian Luo
Congratulations

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 8:55 PM YunKun Huang  wrote:

> Thanks everyone :)
>
> Will continue to work with community to make Dubbo better and more easy to
> use.
>
> On 2019/02/22 12:21:17, Huxing Zhang  wrote:
> > Hi Community,
> >
> > On behalf of the Dubbo PPMC, I am pleased to announce that Yunkun
> Huang[1]
> > has been voted in as a new Dubbo PPMC member.
> >
> > Please join me to say congratulations to him!
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/htynkn
> > --
> > Best Regards!
> > Huxing
> >
>


Re: discuss dubbo support opentracing

2019-02-24 Thread Ian Luo
Xiaoguang,

Would you mind to provide us more infos on async call not working on zipkin
plugin? You may consider to file an issue first where you can describe the
issue better and provide the concrete steps to reproduce it.

Thanks,
-Ian.


On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 5:54 PM Xiaoguang Ma  wrote:

> async call not work in zipkin plugin.
> zipkin plugin support dubbo2.7.
>
> can we talk about it
>
>
>
> Xiaoguang Ma
> Apache ShardingSphere
>
> 
>
> Signature is customized by Netease Mail Master
> 
>
> On 01/30/2019 17:22, Xiaoguang Ma  wrote:
> Opentracing org already agree and promise to review. Now, I am doing in my
> repository. Xiaoguang Ma Apache ShardingSphere Signature is customized by
> Netease Mail Master On 01/30/2019 14:50, Ian Luo wrote: Xiaoguang, You can
> start your work in github.com/dubbo for now, then you can approach
> opentracing org to check if they are willing to accept your work. I can
> create a new project in dubbo group [1] for your experiment. Thanks, -Ian.
> 1. github.com/dubbo On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:03 AM Xiaoguang Ma <
> maxiaogu...@apache.org> wrote: > Ok, I try to connect opentracing whether
> I can push this in opentracing > repository or not > > Ma Xiaoguang >
> Apache ShardingSphere > > > maxiaoguang 
> 于2019年1月30日周三 上午9:49写道: > > > Yes, zipkin and skywalking also support
> opentracing. > > > > > > > > Ma Xiaoguang > > Apache ShardingSphere > > > >
> < >
> https://maas.mail.163.com/dashi-web-extend/html/proSignature.html?ftlId=2=Ma+Xiaoguang=maxiaoguang64%40gmail.com=Apache%C2%A0ShardingSphere=%5B%22%22%5D
> > > > > > > Signature is customized by Netease Mail Master > > <
> https://mail.163.com/dashi/dlpro.html?from=mail88;; > > > > On
> 01/29/2019 17:20, Yunkun Huang  wrote: > > Currently
> there is a filter in brave to support integration with zipkin > > >
> https://github.com/openzipkin/brave/tree/master/instrumentation/dubbo-rpc
> > > > > But provide a integration with opentracing api directly, it may
> give more > > choice for users. > > > > On 2019/01/29 08:39:52, Xiaoguang
> Ma  wrote: > > > I find a issue #3209 < > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/issues/3209; in > > >
> github. > > > I have some experience in opentracing. > > > So I want to do
> it. > > > I will provider a filter that implement
> org.apache.dubbo.rpc.Filter and > > use > > > opentracing api. > > > Can i
> do it? > > > > > > Xiaoguang Ma from ShardingSphere > > > > > > > > >
> Huxing Zhang  于2019年1月29日周二 下午4:13写道: > > > > > > >
> Hi, > > > > > > > > Would you please elaborate what you want to discuss
> here? > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 5:46 PM Ma Xiaoguang < >
> maxiaoguan...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > -- > > > > Best Regards! > > > > Huxing > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Next Dubbo meetup

2019-02-24 Thread Ian Luo
I think we should start a new thread to call for topics from the community,
as soon as possible.

Thanks,
-Ian.

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:20 AM jun liu  wrote:

> Should we start a new thread collecting topics now?
>
> Jun
>
> > On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Huxing Zhang  wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > It looks we've reached consensus here.
> >
> > The next meetup will be held on March 23rd in Nanjing.
> >
> > I will work with PPMC to decide the schedule of this event.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:58 PM Ian Luo  wrote:
> >
> >> +1 to the proposed time and location.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:56 PM victory  wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 for Nanjing
> >>> And any weekend is fine for me.
> >>>
> >>> Minxuan Zhuang  于2019年2月18日周一 下午5:49写道:
> >>>
>  +1 for March 23rd
>  +1 for Nanjing
> 
>  On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:41 PM jun liu  wrote:
> 
> >> Can we make it Mar 23rd? As our venue is available on that day.
> >
> > +1 for Mar. 23th, any time is ok for me.
> >
> > +1 for hosting in Nanjing.
> >
> > Jun
> >
> >> On Feb 12, 2019, at 12:20 PM, 王蓉(涂南) 
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Mar 15th is Friday.
> >>
> >> Can we make it Mar 23rd? As our venue is available on that day.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> 发件人:Ian Luo 
> >> 发送时间:2019年2月1日(星期五) 17:12
> >> 收件人:dev 
> >> 抄 送:王蓉(涂南) 
> >> 主 题:Re: 回复:[DISCUSS] Next Dubbo meetup
> >>
> >> +1 Mar. 15th looks better.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:49 AM Huxing Zhang 
>  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Consider the Chinese New Year vacation, how about move one week
> >>> later?
> >>>
> >>> Location: Nanjing
> >>> Call for talks close:  Feb. 22nd (Friday)
> >>> Meetup: March 15th (Saturday)
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:47 PM Ian Luo 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
>  +1 for Nanjing. I think any weekend in March sounds fine to me.
> 
>  Thanks,
>  -Ian.
> 
>  On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 5:12 PM Huxing Zhang 
> > wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:19 AM 王蓉(涂南) <
> >> tunan...@alibaba-inc.com
> 
>  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> Last week meetup in Guangzhou was so much fun.
> >> We have total 400+ registrations and more than 200 attendees,
>  another
>  4k
> >> people watched our live streaming!
> >>
> >> I think we should start to prepare next meetup in Nanjing ASAP.
> >>> As
> >>> the
> >> Chinese New Year is approaching.
> >>
> >
> > We need to first discuss with the community about:
> > - where should next meetup be held?
> > - when should it be held?
> >
> > As discussed in the previous threads, based on the vote result,
> >> I
> > think
> > Nanjing is a good candidate for the next meetup.
> > +1 for Nanjing!
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> What about March 9th?If March 9th is OK, the Call for Talks
> >> will
> >>> be
> > closed
> >> on Feb 15th. That will give us plenty of time to prepare.
> >>
> >
> > March 9th is a Saturday, which looks good to me.
> > Feb 15th looks too early to me, because the Chinese new year
>  festival
> >>> is
> > Feb 4th to Feb 10th. There is only one week after the vacation,
> >>> and
>  it
> >>> is
> > possible some of us would have extra days-off after the
> >> vacation.
> > Is is possible to close the Call for talks one week later? say
> >> Feb
> >>> 22nd.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Amber
> >> BR
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> --
> >> 发件人:Huxing Zhang 
> >> 发送时间:2018年12月11日(星期二) 15:15
> >> 收件人:dev 
> >> 主 题:Re: 回复:[DISCUSS] Next Dubbo meetup
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I think Guangzhou and Nanjing are the cities we all should go
> >> to.
>  It
> >>> is
> >> just about who is the first.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:07 PM Mercy 
>  wrote:
> >>
> >>> I vote twice, one is Nanjing, another is Guangzhou :D
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards,
> >>>
> >>> Mercy Ma
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 在 2018/12/11 下午1:47, 王蓉(涂南) 写道:
>  Folks, so far we have received 40 votes.
> 
>  Looks like Guangzhou is where we're gonna meet on Jan 19th.
> 
> 
>  广州  12
>  南京  10
>  北京  4
>  深圳  4
>  上海  4
>  厦门