Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Lightweight HTTP Service version 0.1.4

2012-02-05 Thread Ken Gilmer
Karl & Richard,

  Karl, I've addressed the issue with the NOTICE file so I think we're
alright there.  Richard, was your response an implicit +1?  From the
release procedure documentation I need three votes, and I just want to
be sure you've voted positively before I perform the release.

thx,
ken

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Karl Pauls  wrote:
> +1 on the release if the NOTICE as soon as it is fixed in trunk.
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Ken Gilmer  wrote:
>> Thanks for your feedback Richard and Karl.  Well, given my luck with
>> exploding stuff in wonderful strange ways, I'd prefer the "fix it in
>> trunk and continue with the given release" route.  But, I'm also happy
>> to fix the NOTICE and roll a new release if anyone would prefer me to
>> do that.
>>
>> thx,
>> ken
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Karl Pauls  wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Richard S. Hall  
>>> wrote:
 On 1/26/12 8:09, Ken Gilmer wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Richard S. Hall
>  wrote:
>>
>> The complete bundle includes OSGi classes, but does not list them in the
>> NOTICE file. It's not clear to me if this is a requirement, since they
>> OSGi
>> artifacts themselves don't include a NOTICE, but we generally do include
>> them in the NOTICE file for the framework JARs.
>
> In my memory I'd checked the http-bundle module and followed it but
> now that I check again I can see that it does in fact include the OSGi
> classes in the NOTICE.  I can add that.
>
>> Also, I noticed that the DEPs file for the complete bundle was the old
>> format while the core bundle was auto-generated, was there a reason for
>> this?
>
> That is very strange.  It took me a bit to figure out what you meant.
> On my local machine where I did the build the jars both contain the
> old format (meaning, not auto generated).  But when I download the
> jars from the repo I can see that the complete bundle has the auto
> generated DEPENDENCIES file.  I was under assumption that what I was
> building locally was what was being sent to the repo.


 Yeah, I certainly don't know what's going on...I depend on Karl for
 releasing stuff. ;-)

 The DEPs file stuff isn't so important anyway, I only mention for reasons 
 of
 consistency...my real question is about the NOTICE. If others think it 
 isn't
 important, then we are probably good to go.
>>>
>>> I'd say it is up to the Release Manager (i.e., Ken in this case). The
>>> osgi jars don't contain a NOTICE so they don't have to be mentioned. I
>>> guess I just fix it in trunk and go ahead with the release unless it
>>> is easy for you to re-roll at this time. Just let us know what you
>>> want to do...
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Karl
>>>
 Thanks.

 -> richard


>
> thx
> ken
>
>> ->  richard
>>
>>
>> On 1/20/12 0:57, Ken Gilmer wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We resolved 3 defects and added 3 features in this release:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+component+%3D+%22Lightweight+HTTP+Service%22+AND+status+%3D+Resolved+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
>>>
>>> There are currently no outstanding issues.
>>>
>>> Staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-108/
>>>
>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>>> signatures:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>>
>>> Usage:
>>> sh check_staged_release.sh 108 /tmp/felix-staging
>>>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Karl Pauls
>>> karlpa...@gmail.com
>>> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
>>> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
>
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpa...@gmail.com
> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls


[jira] [Resolved] (FELIX-3338) Add support for optional attributes in the MetaDataReader as defined in the XML schema for metatype

2012-02-05 Thread Marcel Offermans (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marcel Offermans resolved FELIX-3338.
-

   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s:  metatype-1.0.6

Implemented support in the relevant objects. You can now get a list of optional 
attributes for such objects.

> Add support for optional attributes in the MetaDataReader as defined in the 
> XML schema for metatype
> ---
>
> Key: FELIX-3338
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3338
> Project: Felix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Metatype Service
>Affects Versions: metatype-1.0.4
>Reporter: Marcel Offermans
>Assignee: Marcel Offermans
> Fix For:  metatype-1.0.6
>
>
> If you look at the metatype spec, 105.8 shows the XML schema for metatype. We 
> have a parser for it called MetaDataReader, and it basically converts the XML 
> file into a tree of Java objects (MetaData and related). The schema, in 
> several locations, allows you to use optional attributes (scan the schema for 
> ). Our parser currently does not have a way to read such 
> attributes though, but it should! :)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Work stopped] (FELIX-3338) Add support for optional attributes in the MetaDataReader as defined in the XML schema for metatype

2012-02-05 Thread Marcel Offermans (Work stopped) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Work on FELIX-3338 stopped by Marcel Offermans.

> Add support for optional attributes in the MetaDataReader as defined in the 
> XML schema for metatype
> ---
>
> Key: FELIX-3338
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3338
> Project: Felix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Metatype Service
>Affects Versions: metatype-1.0.4
>Reporter: Marcel Offermans
>Assignee: Marcel Offermans
>
> If you look at the metatype spec, 105.8 shows the XML schema for metatype. We 
> have a parser for it called MetaDataReader, and it basically converts the XML 
> file into a tree of Java objects (MetaData and related). The schema, in 
> several locations, allows you to use optional attributes (scan the schema for 
> ). Our parser currently does not have a way to read such 
> attributes though, but it should! :)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Work started] (FELIX-3338) Add support for optional attributes in the MetaDataReader as defined in the XML schema for metatype

2012-02-05 Thread Marcel Offermans (Work started) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Work on FELIX-3338 started by Marcel Offermans.

> Add support for optional attributes in the MetaDataReader as defined in the 
> XML schema for metatype
> ---
>
> Key: FELIX-3338
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3338
> Project: Felix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Metatype Service
>Affects Versions: metatype-1.0.4
>Reporter: Marcel Offermans
>Assignee: Marcel Offermans
>
> If you look at the metatype spec, 105.8 shows the XML schema for metatype. We 
> have a parser for it called MetaDataReader, and it basically converts the XML 
> file into a tree of Java objects (MetaData and related). The schema, in 
> several locations, allows you to use optional attributes (scan the schema for 
> ). Our parser currently does not have a way to read such 
> attributes though, but it should! :)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Created] (FELIX-3338) Add support for optional attributes in the MetaDataReader as defined in the XML schema for metatype

2012-02-05 Thread Marcel Offermans (Created) (JIRA)
Add support for optional attributes in the MetaDataReader as defined in the XML 
schema for metatype
---

 Key: FELIX-3338
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3338
 Project: Felix
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Metatype Service
Affects Versions: metatype-1.0.4
Reporter: Marcel Offermans


If you look at the metatype spec, 105.8 shows the XML schema for metatype. We 
have a parser for it called MetaDataReader, and it basically converts the XML 
file into a tree of Java objects (MetaData and related). The schema, in several 
locations, allows you to use optional attributes (scan the schema for 
). Our parser currently does not have a way to read such 
attributes though, but it should! :)


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Assigned] (FELIX-3338) Add support for optional attributes in the MetaDataReader as defined in the XML schema for metatype

2012-02-05 Thread Marcel Offermans (Assigned) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marcel Offermans reassigned FELIX-3338:
---

Assignee: Marcel Offermans

> Add support for optional attributes in the MetaDataReader as defined in the 
> XML schema for metatype
> ---
>
> Key: FELIX-3338
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3338
> Project: Felix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Metatype Service
>Affects Versions: metatype-1.0.4
>Reporter: Marcel Offermans
>Assignee: Marcel Offermans
>
> If you look at the metatype spec, 105.8 shows the XML schema for metatype. We 
> have a parser for it called MetaDataReader, and it basically converts the XML 
> file into a tree of Java objects (MetaData and related). The schema, in 
> several locations, allows you to use optional attributes (scan the schema for 
> ). Our parser currently does not have a way to read such 
> attributes though, but it should! :)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




Re: Metatype: Parsing optional data with MetaDataReader

2012-02-05 Thread Marcel Offermans
Welcome Frederic! You can argue that the current implementation already allows 
this, as it does not trip over optional attributes: it simply ignores them. :) 
But I will create a Jira issue and code to include them in the resulting Java 
objects.

On Feb 4, 2012, at 14:41 PM, Frederic Esnault wrote:

> I'd say that if the spec allows that, Felix should allow it too.
> My first post here, hi everyone :)
> Frederic
> 
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Marcel Offermans <
> marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> If you look at the metatype spec, 105.8 shows the XML schema for metatype.
>> We have a parser for it called MetaDataReader, and it basically converts
>> the XML file into a tree of Java objects (MetaData and related). The
>> schema, in several locations, allows you to use optional attributes (scan
>> the schema for ). Our parser currently does not have a way
>> to read such attributes though.
>> 
>> Since it's my itch, I'd like to add support for that, but before I do the
>> work I wanted to first discuss it here. Any thoughts?
>> 
>> Greetings, Marcel
>> 
>>