[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-6682) Felix SCR - 3 TestCases fail in OSGi TCK
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom Watson updated FELIX-6682: -- Fix Version/s: scr-2.2.8 > Felix SCR - 3 TestCases fail in OSGi TCK > - > > Key: FELIX-6682 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6682 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Declarative Services (SCR) >Reporter: Stefan Bischof >Priority: Major > Fix For: scr-2.2.8 > > > Felix SCR doea not passt the the OSGi TCK with 3 tests. > Versions: 2.2.0-RC - 2.2.6 > https://github.com/osgi/osgi/pull/657 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-6682) Felix SCR - 3 TestCases fail in OSGi TCK
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17807871#comment-17807871 ] Tom Watson commented on FELIX-6682: --- Fix going with https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/291 > Felix SCR - 3 TestCases fail in OSGi TCK > - > > Key: FELIX-6682 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6682 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Declarative Services (SCR) >Reporter: Stefan Bischof >Priority: Major > > Felix SCR doea not passt the the OSGi TCK with 3 tests. > Versions: 2.2.0-RC - 2.2.6 > https://github.com/osgi/osgi/pull/657 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[PR] Scr fix6682 [felix-dev]
tjwatson opened a new pull request, #291: URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/291 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-6682) Felix SCR - 3 TestCases fail in OSGi TCK
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17807861#comment-17807861 ] Tom Watson commented on FELIX-6682: --- See https://github.com/osgi/osgi/pull/657#issuecomment-1896477389 The TCK for scr (component) has a bug. But the end result is that an assertion of the specification was never properly tested resulting in a bug in Felix SCR where calls to org.osgi.service.component.ComponentServiceObjects.ungetService(S) for a foreign object are not properly throwing an IllegalArgumentException. > Felix SCR - 3 TestCases fail in OSGi TCK > - > > Key: FELIX-6682 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6682 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Declarative Services (SCR) >Reporter: Stefan Bischof >Priority: Major > > Felix SCR doea not passt the the OSGi TCK with 3 tests. > Versions: 2.2.0-RC - 2.2.6 > https://github.com/osgi/osgi/pull/657 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Closed] (FELIX-6672) Potentially losing comment state between reads on CommentRemovingReader
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Munteanu closed FELIX-6672. -- > Potentially losing comment state between reads on CommentRemovingReader > --- > > Key: FELIX-6672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6672 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: cm.json-2.0.4 >Reporter: Dominik Süß >Assignee: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Fix For: cm.json-2.0.6 > > > In more extensive testing on real world data I found a case that was not > properly handled in the rewrite towards BufferedReader. If. a read ends > between the first / and the subsequent / or * for comment start, the > detection will currently fail. > To fix this I refactored the detection logic that should now also be > significantly better readable always capturing the previous char on class > level allowing to check for char double char sequences that may be split by > the reads. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Felix cm.json 2.0.6
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Carsten Ziegeler, Karl Pauls, David Bosschaert Can a Felix PMC member please upload the artifacts to the Felix dist directory and release the cm.json-2.0.6 version? I will then promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository. Thanks! Robert
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix cm.json 2.0.6
+1 David On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 13:18, Karl Pauls wrote: > +1 > > regards, > > Karl > > On Wednesday, January 17, 2024, Robert Munteanu > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 14:09 +0100, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > > > Can two more PMC members please review and vote? > > > > Thanks, > > Robert > > > > > -- > Karl Pauls > karlpa...@gmail.com >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix cm.json 2.0.6
+1 regards, Karl On Wednesday, January 17, 2024, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 14:09 +0100, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Please vote to approve this release: > > Can two more PMC members please review and vote? > > Thanks, > Robert > -- Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix cm.json 2.0.6
Hi, On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 14:09 +0100, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Please vote to approve this release: Can two more PMC members please review and vote? Thanks, Robert
Re: [PR] Adds Requirement for Configuration Admin [felix-dev]
cziegeler commented on PR #290: URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/290#issuecomment-1895337236 Apache Felix ConfigAdmin still includes the api packages. If it helps, we can include the require capability; however I think the api bundle is the one that should be fixed - as the API really requires an implementation. An API bundle alone is useless. That's easier to change then each and every consumer bundle of the API. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Adds Requirement for Configuration Admin [felix-dev]
juergen-albert commented on PR #290: URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/290#issuecomment-1895315992 It was in the Past, as the felix cm shipped the api packages as well. Today it does not, which leads to resolver to include the API bundle, but no implementation, which is quite annoying. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
