Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution
Done - added systemready-0.1.0 :) Best, David On 9 May 2018 at 12:57, Andrei Dulvac wrote: > David, I'll not settle for the finger and go for the hand :) > Could I have a systemready-0.1.0 version as well? > > - Andrei > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:56 PM Andrei Dulvac > wrote: > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:51 PM David Bosschaert < > > david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Andrei, > >> > >> I just added it. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> David > >> > >> On 9 May 2018 at 12:46, Andrei Dulvac wrote: > >> > >> > "systemready" it is then. > >> > Can someone help me out with the jira component or make it so that i > can > >> > help myself out? > >> > > >> > I think we need a "System Ready" component on the project. > >> > > >> > - Andrei > >> > > >> > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM Christian Schneider < > >> > ch...@die-schneider.net> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > I like systemready as it is simpler and describes our desired state. > >> > > > >> > > Christian > >> > > > >> > > 2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz < > >> bdelacre...@apache.org>: > >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name; > >> > > > > suggestions more than welcome > >> > > > > >> > > > "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-) > >> > > > > >> > > > -Bertrand > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > -- > >> > > Christian Schneider > >> > > http://www.liquid-reality.de > >> > > > >> > > Computer Scientist > >> > > http://www.adobe.com > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution
David, I'll not settle for the finger and go for the hand :) Could I have a systemready-0.1.0 version as well? - Andrei On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:56 PM Andrei Dulvac wrote: > Thanks a lot! > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:51 PM David Bosschaert < > david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Andrei, >> >> I just added it. >> >> Best regards, >> >> David >> >> On 9 May 2018 at 12:46, Andrei Dulvac wrote: >> >> > "systemready" it is then. >> > Can someone help me out with the jira component or make it so that i can >> > help myself out? >> > >> > I think we need a "System Ready" component on the project. >> > >> > - Andrei >> > >> > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM Christian Schneider < >> > ch...@die-schneider.net> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > I like systemready as it is simpler and describes our desired state. >> > > >> > > Christian >> > > >> > > 2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz < >> bdelacre...@apache.org>: >> > > >> > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac >> > > wrote: >> > > > > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name; >> > > > > suggestions more than welcome >> > > > >> > > > "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-) >> > > > >> > > > -Bertrand >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > -- >> > > Christian Schneider >> > > http://www.liquid-reality.de >> > > >> > > Computer Scientist >> > > http://www.adobe.com >> > > >> > >> >
Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution
Thanks a lot! On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:51 PM David Bosschaert wrote: > Hi Andrei, > > I just added it. > > Best regards, > > David > > On 9 May 2018 at 12:46, Andrei Dulvac wrote: > > > "systemready" it is then. > > Can someone help me out with the jira component or make it so that i can > > help myself out? > > > > I think we need a "System Ready" component on the project. > > > > - Andrei > > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM Christian Schneider < > > ch...@die-schneider.net> > > wrote: > > > > > I like systemready as it is simpler and describes our desired state. > > > > > > Christian > > > > > > 2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz >: > > > > > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac > > > wrote: > > > > > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name; > > > > > suggestions more than welcome > > > > > > > > "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-) > > > > > > > > -Bertrand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -- > > > Christian Schneider > > > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > > > > > Computer Scientist > > > http://www.adobe.com > > > > > >
Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution
Hi Andrei, I just added it. Best regards, David On 9 May 2018 at 12:46, Andrei Dulvac wrote: > "systemready" it is then. > Can someone help me out with the jira component or make it so that i can > help myself out? > > I think we need a "System Ready" component on the project. > > - Andrei > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM Christian Schneider < > ch...@die-schneider.net> > wrote: > > > I like systemready as it is simpler and describes our desired state. > > > > Christian > > > > 2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz : > > > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac > > wrote: > > > > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name; > > > > suggestions more than welcome > > > > > > "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-) > > > > > > -Bertrand > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -- > > Christian Schneider > > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > > > Computer Scientist > > http://www.adobe.com > > >
Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution
"systemready" it is then. Can someone help me out with the jira component or make it so that i can help myself out? I think we need a "System Ready" component on the project. - Andrei On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM Christian Schneider wrote: > I like systemready as it is simpler and describes our desired state. > > Christian > > 2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz : > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac > wrote: > > > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name; > > > suggestions more than welcome > > > > "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-) > > > > -Bertrand > > > > > > -- > -- > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Computer Scientist > http://www.adobe.com >
Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution
I like systemready as it is simpler and describes our desired state. Christian 2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz : > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac wrote: > > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name; > > suggestions more than welcome > > "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-) > > -Bertrand > -- -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Computer Scientist http://www.adobe.com
Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution
+1 I am also open to other names if anyone has a good idea. Christian 2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz : > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac wrote: > > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name; > > suggestions more than welcome > > "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-) > > -Bertrand > -- -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Computer Scientist http://www.adobe.com
Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac wrote: > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name; > suggestions more than welcome "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-) -Bertrand
"system readiness check framework" contribution
Thanks Karl. Before we push the code to felix, we need to change the namespace. @all, what do you think the best name should be? I was thinking: GID: org.apache.felix AID: org.apache.felix.systemreadiness VER: 0.1.0-SNAPSHOT destination dir: /org.apache.felix.systemreadiness (or just "systemreadiness" ?) What do you think? I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name; suggestions more than welcome. - Andrei On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:22 PM Karl Pauls wrote: > The ip clearance is done. > > Andrei, Christian, you can proceed to get the code into Felix. > > regards, > > Karl > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > > Time to call the vote on accepting the "system readiness check > > framework" contribution by Andrei > > Dulvac and Christian Schneider. > > > > * +1 votes from Neil Bartlett, Karl Pauls, Carsten Ziegeler, Raymond > > Auge, Pierre De Rop, and David Bosschaert. > > > > * No other votes. > > > > The vote is successful. I will follow-up with Andrei and Christian and > > get the ip-clearance started asap. > > > > -- > Karl Pauls > karlpa...@gmail.com >
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution
The ip clearance is done. Andrei, Christian, you can proceed to get the code into Felix. regards, Karl On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > Time to call the vote on accepting the "system readiness check > framework" contribution by Andrei > Dulvac and Christian Schneider. > > * +1 votes from Neil Bartlett, Karl Pauls, Carsten Ziegeler, Raymond > Auge, Pierre De Rop, and David Bosschaert. > > * No other votes. > > The vote is successful. I will follow-up with Andrei and Christian and > get the ip-clearance started asap. -- Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution
Pretty cool. Looking forward to what we can make out of this little project together. Cheers Christian 2018-04-23 14:19 GMT+02:00 Karl Pauls : > Time to call the vote on accepting the "system readiness check > framework" contribution by Andrei > Dulvac and Christian Schneider. > > * +1 votes from Neil Bartlett, Karl Pauls, Carsten Ziegeler, Raymond > Auge, Pierre De Rop, and David Bosschaert. > > * No other votes. > > The vote is successful. I will follow-up with Andrei and Christian and > get the ip-clearance started asap. > -- -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Computer Scientist http://www.adobe.com
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution
Thank you all for the support, I am excited! - Andrei On Mon, Apr 23, 2018, 14:20 Karl Pauls wrote: > Time to call the vote on accepting the "system readiness check > framework" contribution by Andrei > Dulvac and Christian Schneider. > > * +1 votes from Neil Bartlett, Karl Pauls, Carsten Ziegeler, Raymond > Auge, Pierre De Rop, and David Bosschaert. > > * No other votes. > > The vote is successful. I will follow-up with Andrei and Christian and > get the ip-clearance started asap. >
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution
Time to call the vote on accepting the "system readiness check framework" contribution by Andrei Dulvac and Christian Schneider. * +1 votes from Neil Bartlett, Karl Pauls, Carsten Ziegeler, Raymond Auge, Pierre De Rop, and David Bosschaert. * No other votes. The vote is successful. I will follow-up with Andrei and Christian and get the ip-clearance started asap.
Re: [VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution
+1 David On 20 April 2018 at 10:38, Karl Pauls wrote: > I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework" > contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei > Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are > interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is > quite some interest in the idea. > > We should bring it to a vote. > > This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is > successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance > sorted-out. > > Please cast your votes: > > [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix > [ ] -1 Do not >
Re: [VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution
+1 Regards Pierre Le ven 20 avr. 2018 15:58, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : > +1 > > > Karl Pauls wrote > > I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework" > > contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei > > Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are > > interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is > > quite some interest in the idea. > > > > We should bring it to a vote. > > > > This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is > > successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance > > sorted-out. > > > > Please cast your votes: > > > > [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix > > [ ] -1 Do not > > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > Adobe Research Switzerland > cziege...@apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution
+1 nonbinding - Ray On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > +1 > > > Karl Pauls wrote > > I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework" > > contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei > > Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are > > interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is > > quite some interest in the idea. > > > > We should bring it to a vote. > > > > This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is > > successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance > > sorted-out. > > > > Please cast your votes: > > > > [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix > > [ ] -1 Do not > > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > Adobe Research Switzerland > cziege...@apache.org > -- *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay) Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)
Re: [VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution
+1 Karl Pauls wrote > I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework" > contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei > Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are > interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is > quite some interest in the idea. > > We should bring it to a vote. > > This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is > successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance > sorted-out. > > Please cast your votes: > > [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix > [ ] -1 Do not > -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution
+1 regards, Karl On Friday, April 20, 2018, Neil Bartlett wrote: > +1 nonbinding > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Karl Pauls wrote: > > > I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework" > > contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei > > Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are > > interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is > > quite some interest in the idea. > > > > We should bring it to a vote. > > > > This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is > > successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance > > sorted-out. > > > > Please cast your votes: > > > > [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix > > [ ] -1 Do not > > > -- Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution
+1 nonbinding On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Karl Pauls wrote: > I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework" > contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei > Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are > interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is > quite some interest in the idea. > > We should bring it to a vote. > > This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is > successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance > sorted-out. > > Please cast your votes: > > [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix > [ ] -1 Do not >
[VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution
I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework" contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is quite some interest in the idea. We should bring it to a vote. This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance sorted-out. Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix [ ] -1 Do not
