[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13933001#comment-13933001
 ] 

Benjamin Debeerst edited comment on FELIX-4455 at 3/13/14 8:36 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I recompiled with {{mvn clean package}} each time. I used manipulator 
version 1.11.1 (maven plugin), but the same also happenend for 1.10.1.

The [project on 
GitHub|https://github.com/BenjaminDebeerst/ipojo-component-constructor-sample] 
is a proper maven project, so it should be possible to simply clone, build and 
run it.


was (Author: benjamindebeerst):
Yes, I recompiled with {{mvn clean package}} each time. I used manipulator 
version 1.11.1 (maven plugin), but the same also happenend for 1.10.1.

The project on GitHub is a proper maven project, so it should be possible to 
simply build and run it.

> Missing default constructor creates invalid class instances
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-4455
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4455
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: iPOJO
>    Affects Versions: ipojo-manipulator-1.10.1, ipojo-manipulator-1.11.1
>            Reporter: Benjamin Debeerst
>
> Consider the following component definition: 
> @Component
> @Instantiate
> public class ComponentWithoutDefaultConstructor
> {
>     private Object internal = new Object();
>     @Property
>     private String property;
>     /* Constructor for unit tests */
>     public ComponentWithoutDefaultConstructor(String property)
>     {
>         System.out.println("Non-default constructor call!");
>         this.property = property;
>     }
>     @Validate
>     public void activate()
>     {
>         System.out.println("ComponentWithoutDefaultConstructor: activating!");
>         System.out.println(this.internal);
>     }
> }
> As per definition, I would expect every instance of this class to have a 
> non-null member {{internal}} at class creation. This is all fine for my unit 
> tests in a non-OSGi environment.
> However, having this processes by iPOJO and putting this in an OSGi 
> container, the component outputs 
> ComponentWithoutDefaultConstructor: activating!
> null
> The existing non-default constructor is not called, while it seems that a 
> separate constructor has been created that does non instantiate the member 
> variable.
> If I extend the code by an empty default constructor, that one is called and 
> all works perfectly fine.
> I have no idea how iPOJO creates the object instance anyways, as it should 
> not be possible to create such an invalid object instance. I don't know much 
> about the reflection APIs or byte code manipulation though.
> I have put a sample maven project on GitHub[1], which can be built and 
> droppped into a fresh Karaf container + iPOJO, which shows the problem.
> If there is no constructor iPOJO can use, I would expect iPOJO to either A) 
> throw a warning/error (and build or runtime) and fail to instantiate the 
> component or B) synthesize the default constructor properly, including the 
> implicit instantiation of member variables.
> I encountered this problem both with iPOJO 1.10.1 and 1.11.1.
> [1] https://github.com/BenjaminDebeerst/ipojo-component-constructor-sample



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to