[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-2355) [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal commands
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom Watson updated FELIX-2355: -- Fix Version/s: (was: gogo.runtime-1.1.4) > [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal > commands > > > Key: FELIX-2355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Gogo Runtime >Affects Versions: gogo-0.6.0 >Reporter: Richard S. Hall >Priority: Major > > Currently, closures are treated differently when it comes to scopes than > normal commands. It would be better if they were assigned an explicit default > scope if none were specified and that scope could be placed in the scope path > as desired. Likewise if the scope for a closure is explicitly specified when > creating the closure. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-2355) [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal commands
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Augé updated FELIX-2355: Fix Version/s: (was: gogo.runtime-1.0.0) gogo.runtime-1.1.4 > [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal > commands > > > Key: FELIX-2355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Gogo Runtime >Affects Versions: gogo-0.6.0 >Reporter: Richard S. Hall >Priority: Major > Fix For: gogo.runtime-1.1.4 > > > Currently, closures are treated differently when it comes to scopes than > normal commands. It would be better if they were assigned an explicit default > scope if none were specified and that scope could be placed in the scope path > as desired. Likewise if the scope for a closure is explicitly specified when > creating the closure. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-2355) [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal commands
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carsten Ziegeler updated FELIX-2355: Fix Version/s: (was: gogo.runtime-0.12.1) gogo-runtime-0.16.4 > [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal > commands > > > Key: FELIX-2355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Gogo Runtime >Affects Versions: gogo-0.6.0 >Reporter: Richard S. Hall > Fix For: gogo-runtime-0.16.4 > > > Currently, closures are treated differently when it comes to scopes than > normal commands. It would be better if they were assigned an explicit default > scope if none were specified and that scope could be placed in the scope path > as desired. Likewise if the scope for a closure is explicitly specified when > creating the closure. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-2355) [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal commands
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet updated FELIX-2355: --- Fix Version/s: (was: gogo.runtime-0.12.0) gogo.runtime-0.12.1 > [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal > commands > > > Key: FELIX-2355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Gogo Runtime >Affects Versions: gogo-0.6.0 >Reporter: Richard S. Hall > Fix For: gogo.runtime-0.12.1 > > > Currently, closures are treated differently when it comes to scopes than > normal commands. It would be better if they were assigned an explicit default > scope if none were specified and that scope could be placed in the scope path > as desired. Likewise if the scope for a closure is explicitly specified when > creating the closure. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-2355) [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal commands
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-2355: --- Fix Version/s: (was: gogo.runtime-0.10.0) gogo.runtime-0.12.0 > [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal > commands > > > Key: FELIX-2355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Gogo Runtime >Affects Versions: gogo-0.6.0 >Reporter: Richard S. Hall > Fix For: gogo.runtime-0.12.0 > > > Currently, closures are treated differently when it comes to scopes than > normal commands. It would be better if they were assigned an explicit default > scope if none were specified and that scope could be placed in the scope path > as desired. Likewise if the scope for a closure is explicitly specified when > creating the closure. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2355) [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal commands
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-2355: --- Fix Version/s: (was: gogo.runtime-0.8.0) gogo.runtime-0.10.0 > [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal > commands > > > Key: FELIX-2355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Gogo Runtime >Affects Versions: gogo-0.6.0 >Reporter: Richard S. Hall > Fix For: gogo.runtime-0.10.0 > > > Currently, closures are treated differently when it comes to scopes than > normal commands. It would be better if they were assigned an explicit default > scope if none were specified and that scope could be placed in the scope path > as desired. Likewise if the scope for a closure is explicitly specified when > creating the closure. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2355) [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal commands
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-2355: --- Component/s: Gogo Runtime > [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal > commands > > > Key: FELIX-2355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Gogo Runtime >Affects Versions: gogo-0.6.0 >Reporter: Richard S. Hall > Fix For: gogo-0.8.0 > > > Currently, closures are treated differently when it comes to scopes than > normal commands. It would be better if they were assigned an explicit default > scope if none were specified and that scope could be placed in the scope path > as desired. Likewise if the scope for a closure is explicitly specified when > creating the closure. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2355) [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal commands
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-2355: --- Fix Version/s: gogo-0.8.0 (was: gogo-0.6.0) Affects Version/s: gogo-0.6.0 (was: gogo-0.4.0) > [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal > commands > > > Key: FELIX-2355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: gogo-0.6.0 >Reporter: Richard S. Hall > Fix For: gogo-0.8.0 > > > Currently, closures are treated differently when it comes to scopes than > normal commands. It would be better if they were assigned an explicit default > scope if none were specified and that scope could be placed in the scope path > as desired. Likewise if the scope for a closure is explicitly specified when > creating the closure. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
