[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2686) iPOJO external handlers should have consistent namespaces

2010-11-08 Thread Pierre Bourret (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pierre Bourret updated FELIX-2686:
--

Attachment: changed-jmx-handler-namespace.patch.gz

Here is the patch for the JMX handler ! (very little refactoring of the code 
also)

Be careful that some annotations have been moved. Here is the trace of the 
changes :

D   
annotations/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/ipojo/handlers/jmx/JMXMethod.java
D   
annotations/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/ipojo/handlers/jmx/JMXProperty.java
D   
annotations/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/ipojo/handlers/jmx/JMXBean.java
A   annotations/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/ipojo/handler/jmx
A   
annotations/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/ipojo/handler/jmx/JMXMethod.java
A   
annotations/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/ipojo/handler/jmx/JMXProperty.java
A   
annotations/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/ipojo/handler/jmx/JMXBean.java
M   annotations/pom.xml
M   
tests/handler/jmx/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/ipojo/test/component/SimpleManagedComponentAnnotated.java
M   
tests/handler/jmx/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/ipojo/test/MBeanTests.java
M   tests/handler/jmx/src/main/resources/metadata.xml
M   handler/jmx/metadata.xml
M   
handler/jmx/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/ipojo/handlers/jmx/MBeanHandler.java

> iPOJO external handlers should have consistent namespaces
> -
>
> Key: FELIX-2686
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2686
> Project: Felix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: iPOJO
>Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.6.0
>Reporter: Pierre Bourret
>Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: iPOJO-1.8.0
>
> Attachments: changed-jmx-handler-namespace.patch.gz
>
>
> The iPOJO external handlers have different namespaces, and it's confusing. 
> These namespaces must be changed in order to have a coherent naming 
> convention. Nevertheless, backward compatibility must be kept, so existing 
> components can still be used with new versions of handlers

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2686) iPOJO external handlers should have consistent namespaces

2010-11-15 Thread Pierre Bourret (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pierre Bourret updated FELIX-2686:
--

Attachment: changed-jmx-handler-namespace-2.patch.gz

There is a bug in the patch for the JMX handler : the old syntax is not 
accepted any more by the handler.
I have corrected this bug and added a test case to check the old syntax 
compatibility.

This new patch fixes the problem.

I'm naughty... All apologies !


> iPOJO external handlers should have consistent namespaces
> -
>
> Key: FELIX-2686
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2686
> Project: Felix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: iPOJO
>Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.6.0
>Reporter: Pierre Bourret
>Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: iPOJO-1.8.0
>
> Attachments: changed-jmx-handler-namespace-2.patch.gz, 
> changed-jmx-handler-namespace.patch.gz
>
>
> The iPOJO external handlers have different namespaces, and it's confusing. 
> These namespaces must be changed in order to have a coherent naming 
> convention. Nevertheless, backward compatibility must be kept, so existing 
> components can still be used with new versions of handlers

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2686) iPOJO external handlers should have consistent namespaces

2010-11-15 Thread Pierre Bourret (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pierre Bourret updated FELIX-2686:
--

Attachment: (was: changed-jmx-handler-namespace.patch.gz)

> iPOJO external handlers should have consistent namespaces
> -
>
> Key: FELIX-2686
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2686
> Project: Felix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: iPOJO
>Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.6.0
>Reporter: Pierre Bourret
>Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: iPOJO-1.8.0
>
> Attachments: changed-jmx-handler-namespace-2.patch.gz
>
>
> The iPOJO external handlers have different namespaces, and it's confusing. 
> These namespaces must be changed in order to have a coherent naming 
> convention. Nevertheless, backward compatibility must be kept, so existing 
> components can still be used with new versions of handlers

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2686) iPOJO external handlers should have consistent namespaces

2011-01-03 Thread Clement Escoffier (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Clement Escoffier updated FELIX-2686:
-

Fix Version/s: (was: iPOJO-1.8.0)

> iPOJO external handlers should have consistent namespaces
> -
>
> Key: FELIX-2686
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2686
> Project: Felix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: iPOJO
>Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.6.0
>Reporter: Pierre Bourret
>Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: changed-jmx-handler-namespace-2.patch.gz
>
>
> The iPOJO external handlers have different namespaces, and it's confusing. 
> These namespaces must be changed in order to have a coherent naming 
> convention. Nevertheless, backward compatibility must be kept, so existing 
> components can still be used with new versions of handlers

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2686) iPOJO external handlers should have consistent namespaces

2011-01-04 Thread Pierre Bourret (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pierre Bourret updated FELIX-2686:
--

Attachment: changed-eventadmin-handler-namespace.patch.gz

Here is the patch for the eventadmin handler...

The new namespace no longer uses the deprecated 'Publisher' annotation and XML 
element (changed to 'Publishes', see FELIX-2621)


> iPOJO external handlers should have consistent namespaces
> -
>
> Key: FELIX-2686
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2686
> Project: Felix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: iPOJO
>Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.6.0
>Reporter: Pierre Bourret
>Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: changed-eventadmin-handler-namespace.patch.gz, 
> changed-jmx-handler-namespace-2.patch.gz
>
>
> The iPOJO external handlers have different namespaces, and it's confusing. 
> These namespaces must be changed in order to have a coherent naming 
> convention. Nevertheless, backward compatibility must be kept, so existing 
> components can still be used with new versions of handlers

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2686) iPOJO external handlers should have consistent namespaces

2011-01-04 Thread Pierre Bourret (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pierre Bourret updated FELIX-2686:
--

Attachment: changed-extender-handler-namespace.patch.gz

Patch for the extender pattern handler.

> iPOJO external handlers should have consistent namespaces
> -
>
> Key: FELIX-2686
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2686
> Project: Felix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: iPOJO
>Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.6.0
>Reporter: Pierre Bourret
>Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: changed-eventadmin-handler-namespace.patch.gz, 
> changed-extender-handler-namespace.patch.gz, 
> changed-jmx-handler-namespace-2.patch.gz
>
>
> The iPOJO external handlers have different namespaces, and it's confusing. 
> These namespaces must be changed in order to have a coherent naming 
> convention. Nevertheless, backward compatibility must be kept, so existing 
> components can still be used with new versions of handlers

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.