[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Accept the Atomos contribution

[Karl Pauls]

Time to call the vote on accepting the "Atomos" contribution by Thomas Watson.

* +1 votes from Raymond Auge, Richard S. Hall, Karl Pauls, Carsten
Ziegeler, Pierre De Rop, Thomas Watson, David Jencks, David
Bosschaert, Jean-Baptiste Onofré, and Georg Henzler.

* No other votes.

The vote is successful. I will follow-up with Tom to get the
ip-clearance started asap.

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Atomos contribution

[Georg Henzler]

+1

-Georg 

> On 30. Jan 2020, at 19:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> On 29/01/2020 22:40, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> I think the discussion of the "Atomos" contribution
>> (https://github.com/tjwatson/atomos) by Thomas Watson has died down by
>> now. It looks like there is quite some interest in the idea and
>> assuming that the OSGI R8 Core specification will eventually have
>> something like the "OSGi Connect" proposal as part of the Core
>> Framework specification we would need something in this direction
>> anyway.
>> 
>> We should bring it to a vote.
>> 
>> This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
>> successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the IP clearance
>> sorted out.
>> 
>> Please cast your votes:
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
>> [ ] -1 Do not
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Atomos contribution

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

+1

Regards
JB

On 29/01/2020 22:40, Karl Pauls wrote:
> I think the discussion of the "Atomos" contribution
> (https://github.com/tjwatson/atomos) by Thomas Watson has died down by
> now. It looks like there is quite some interest in the idea and
> assuming that the OSGI R8 Core specification will eventually have
> something like the "OSGi Connect" proposal as part of the Core
> Framework specification we would need something in this direction
> anyway.
> 
> We should bring it to a vote.
> 
> This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the IP clearance
> sorted out.
> 
> Please cast your votes:
> 
> [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> [ ] -1 Do not
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Atomos contribution

[davidb]

+1

David

On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 21:41, Karl Pauls  wrote:

> I think the discussion of the "Atomos" contribution
> (https://github.com/tjwatson/atomos) by Thomas Watson has died down by
> now. It looks like there is quite some interest in the idea and
> assuming that the OSGI R8 Core specification will eventually have
> something like the "OSGi Connect" proposal as part of the Core
> Framework specification we would need something in this direction
> anyway.
>
> We should bring it to a vote.
>
> This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the IP clearance
> sorted out.
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> [ ] -1 Do not
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Atomos contribution

[David Jencks]

+1

David Jencks

> On Jan 29, 2020, at 1:40 PM, Karl Pauls  wrote:
> 
> I think the discussion of the "Atomos" contribution
> (https://github.com/tjwatson/atomos) by Thomas Watson has died down by
> now. It looks like there is quite some interest in the idea and
> assuming that the OSGI R8 Core specification will eventually have
> something like the "OSGi Connect" proposal as part of the Core
> Framework specification we would need something in this direction
> anyway.
> 
> We should bring it to a vote.
> 
> This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the IP clearance
> sorted out.
> 
> Please cast your votes:
> 
> [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> [ ] -1 Do not

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Atomos contribution

[Thomas Watson]

+1

Tom

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 3:41 PM Karl Pauls  wrote:

> I think the discussion of the "Atomos" contribution
> (https://github.com/tjwatson/atomos) by Thomas Watson has died down by
> now. It looks like there is quite some interest in the idea and
> assuming that the OSGI R8 Core specification will eventually have
> something like the "OSGi Connect" proposal as part of the Core
> Framework specification we would need something in this direction
> anyway.
>
> We should bring it to a vote.
>
> This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the IP clearance
> sorted out.
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> [ ] -1 Do not
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Atomos contribution

[Pierre De Rop]

+1

Pierre

Le mer. 29 janv. 2020 à 22:44, Carsten Ziegeler  a
écrit :

> +1
>
> Carsten
>
> On 29.01.2020 13:40, Karl Pauls wrote:
> > I think the discussion of the "Atomos" contribution
> > (https://github.com/tjwatson/atomos) by Thomas Watson has died down by
> > now. It looks like there is quite some interest in the idea and
> > assuming that the OSGI R8 Core specification will eventually have
> > something like the "OSGi Connect" proposal as part of the Core
> > Framework specification we would need something in this direction
> > anyway.
> >
> > We should bring it to a vote.
> >
> > This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> > successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the IP clearance
> > sorted out.
> >
> > Please cast your votes:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> > [ ] -1 Do not
> >
>
> --
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziege...@apache.org
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Atomos contribution

[Carsten Ziegeler]

+1

Carsten

On 29.01.2020 13:40, Karl Pauls wrote:

I think the discussion of the "Atomos" contribution
(https://github.com/tjwatson/atomos) by Thomas Watson has died down by
now. It looks like there is quite some interest in the idea and
assuming that the OSGI R8 Core specification will eventually have
something like the "OSGi Connect" proposal as part of the Core
Framework specification we would need something in this direction
anyway.

We should bring it to a vote.

This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the IP clearance
sorted out.

Please cast your votes:

[ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
[ ] -1 Do not



--
--
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Atomos contribution

[Karl Pauls]

+1

regards,

Karl

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:42 PM Richard S. Hall  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> -> richard
>
> On 1/29/20 4:40 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> > I think the discussion of the "Atomos" contribution
> > (https://github.com/tjwatson/atomos) by Thomas Watson has died down by
> > now. It looks like there is quite some interest in the idea and
> > assuming that the OSGI R8 Core specification will eventually have
> > something like the "OSGi Connect" proposal as part of the Core
> > Framework specification we would need something in this direction
> > anyway.
> >
> > We should bring it to a vote.
> >
> > This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> > successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the IP clearance
> > sorted out.
> >
> > Please cast your votes:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> > [ ] -1 Do not
>


-- 
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Atomos contribution

[Raymond Auge]

+1

- Ray

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 4:41 PM Karl Pauls  wrote:

> I think the discussion of the "Atomos" contribution
> (https://github.com/tjwatson/atomos) by Thomas Watson has died down by
> now. It looks like there is quite some interest in the idea and
> assuming that the OSGI R8 Core specification will eventually have
> something like the "OSGi Connect" proposal as part of the Core
> Framework specification we would need something in this direction
> anyway.
>
> We should bring it to a vote.
>
> This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the IP clearance
> sorted out.
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> [ ] -1 Do not
>


-- 
*Raymond Augé* 
 (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* 
 (@Liferay)

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Atomos contribution

[Richard S. Hall]

+1

-> richard

On 1/29/20 4:40 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:

I think the discussion of the "Atomos" contribution
(https://github.com/tjwatson/atomos) by Thomas Watson has died down by
now. It looks like there is quite some interest in the idea and
assuming that the OSGI R8 Core specification will eventually have
something like the "OSGi Connect" proposal as part of the Core
Framework specification we would need something in this direction
anyway.

We should bring it to a vote.

This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the IP clearance
sorted out.

Please cast your votes:

[ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
[ ] -1 Do not