Contributing to Felix
Hello. Any chance anyone could look at PR #103? https://github.com/apache/felix/pull/103 Do I need to sign some sort of contributor agreement? M pgpPS15zhU5v8.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: contributing
Hi Jerome, Maybe you can take a look on the Jira. Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://wwx.talend.com - Reply message - From: jerome moliere jerome.moli...@gmail.com To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: contributing Date: Thu, Dec 8, 2011 11:44 am Hi all, I have some time free, I love Felix and I 'd like to contribute... So could you give some tips for some tasks to be done : what, how to send finished work, what format for docs if it's doc related stuff Thanks regards jerome J.MOLIERE - Mentor/J auteur Eyrolles blog: http://romjethoughts.blogspot.com
Re: contributing
If you have some particular subprojects that you like, then you can always look at JIRA issues against them or go to our wiki and create docs for them (nearly all of our subprojects could benefit from better/more documentation). For the docs, it is just the wiki site...you might be able to write wiki format right in the comments (not sure), but we could always give you write access on the wiki if necessary. Thanks for the offer. Just jump in! - richard On 12/8/11 5:44, jerome moliere wrote: Hi all, I have some time free, I love Felix and I 'd like to contribute... So could you give some tips for some tasks to be done : what, how to send finished work, what format for docs if it's doc related stuff Thanks regards jerome J.MOLIERE - Mentor/J auteur Eyrolles blog: http://romjethoughts.blogspot.com
Re: Contributing a custom list command
Thanks so much, Richard. I followed your instructions. Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2182 Oren Richard S. Hall wrote: You need to open a JIRA issue for this and attach the contribution to that...make sure to check the grant to Apache button. Thanks! - richard
Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix
Hi all, 2008/11/7 David Bosschaert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/11/4 Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think it sounds reasonable. I am all for creating a JIRA issue with appropriate patch. Great. I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-804 where the patch will ultimately be attached. I've attached the patch containing the ListenerHook implementation to this bug. I also put some notes regarding the patch in the comment of the bug. It would be great if someone could review and apply it. Many thanks, David
Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix
I will try to take a look at it soon. - richard David Bosschaert wrote: Hi all, 2008/11/7 David Bosschaert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/11/4 Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think it sounds reasonable. I am all for creating a JIRA issue with appropriate patch. Great. I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-804 where the patch will ultimately be attached. I've attached the patch containing the ListenerHook implementation to this bug. I also put some notes regarding the patch in the comment of the bug. It would be great if someone could review and apply it. Many thanks, David
Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix
2008/11/4 Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think it sounds reasonable. I am all for creating a JIRA issue with appropriate patch. Great. I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-804 where the patch will ultimately be attached. I assume that since this is already in CXF svn repo, that IP clearance is already taken care of, so we should just be able to move forward with the proposed patch. Is that correct? Yes. All the code in the CXF sandbox has been contributed to the ASF through the appropriate processes. Cheers, David
Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix
Hello David, On Nov 4, 2008, at 17:33 , David Bosschaert wrote: In the context of the Apache CXF project a number of people have been involved in implementing the Distribution Software part of Distributed OSGi (RFC 119 [1]). [...] If Felix is interested in taking this implementation, it might make sense to create a bug in Felix JIRA so that this stuff can be attached as a patch to that once its ready to move into Felix. +1 That's great news! After discussing this with you in Berlin, I've become very enthousiastic about this. Greetings, Marcel
Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix
I think it sounds reasonable. I am all for creating a JIRA issue with appropriate patch. I assume that since this is already in CXF svn repo, that IP clearance is already taken care of, so we should just be able to move forward with the proposed patch. Is that correct? - richard David Bosschaert wrote: Hi all, In the context of the Apache CXF project a number of people have been involved in implementing the Distribution Software part of Distributed OSGi (RFC 119 [1]). For its functioning on the client side, Distributed OSGi depends on the OSGi Service Registry Hooks (RFC 126, also available in [1]). To keep us going we implemented certain bits of RFC 126 in a private copy of Felix in the CXF DOSGi buildsystem. However, we would like to use the real Felix, so we are interested in contributing our RFC 126 bits into Felix so we can use it straight from there. This is referenced in CXF bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1897 The CXF codebase doesnt contain all of RFC 126 - it only contains the ListenerHook, which is about a third of RFC 126, but it would provide a start... If Felix is interested in taking this implementation, it might make sense to create a bug in Felix JIRA so that this stuff can be attached as a patch to that once its ready to move into Felix. Thoughts anyone? Best regards, David [1] http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft.pdf
Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix
2008/11/5 David Bosschaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, In the context of the Apache CXF project a number of people have been involved in implementing the Distribution Software part of Distributed OSGi (RFC 119 [1]). For its functioning on the client side, Distributed OSGi depends on the OSGi Service Registry Hooks (RFC 126, also available in [1]). To keep us going we implemented certain bits of RFC 126 in a private copy of Felix in the CXF DOSGi buildsystem. However, we would like to use the real Felix, so we are interested in contributing our RFC 126 bits into Felix so we can use it straight from there. This is referenced in CXF bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1897 The CXF codebase doesnt contain all of RFC 126 - it only contains the ListenerHook, which is about a third of RFC 126, but it would provide a start... If Felix is interested in taking this implementation, it might make sense to create a bug in Felix JIRA so that this stuff can be attached as a patch to that once its ready to move into Felix. Thoughts anyone? +1 sounds good to me Best regards, David [1] http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft.pdf -- Cheers, Stuart
