Re: FalconDart - anybody?

2013-04-04 Thread Hans Van den Keybus
Also check out dartflex:
Https://github.com/frankpepermans/dartflex

He is doing a great job building a flex-like API on top of dart.
In contrast to stagexl, he is using more of the api of Dart itself, but 
implementing utils like an invalidationManager (reflow_manager in his case), 
verticalLayout, etc.
But also components like a viewstack, datagrid, vgroup, ...

Looks very promising and I hope to be able to join in soon.

Sent from my iPhone

On 04 Apr 2013, at 12:02, aYo ~ a...@binitie.com wrote:

 Just looked at stagexl. I like the promise, it's the first time I have seen
 an api in this menagerie of technologies that I actually like. Thanks
 
 ~a~
 www.ayobinitie.com
 http://mrbinitie.blogspot.com
 
 
 On 4 April 2013 10:26, John Cunliffe mahn...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi everybody,
 
 I was just wondering, if anybody else was working on as2dart using Falcon?
 I will try to make use of http://www.stagexl.org.
 
 Any comments/suggestions?
 
 Regards
 John
 


Re: [Website] New website going live

2013-01-30 Thread Hans Van den Keybus
Same thing with the documentation-videso page. It looks a bit chaotic to me, 
this way.
Maybe you could limit the description texts to about 150 chars or something, 
and give all boxes the same height.
Might be a bit easier to navigate trough the videos :)
 

Hans

On 30 Jan 2013, at 10:53, Hans Van den Keybus h...@dotdotcommadot.com wrote:

 Looks great!!
 Minor detail: Wouldn't it be a little tighter if the borders around 
 licensing, desktop Applications etc on the index page all had the same 
 height?
 
 Align the content top-down as it is, but put the read me button on the 
 bottom, so all read-me buttons are visually next to each other.
 No?
 
 
 
 
 On 30 Jan 2013, at 09:40, Tomislav Pokrajcic tomis...@svemir.net wrote:
 
 Looks awesome.
 Btw, text on Gordon Smith profile is duplicated.
 Cheers,
 
 Tomislav
 
 On 30.1.2013. 8:26, Harbs wrote:
 Looks great!
 
 Small thing: On the team page 
 http://flex.staging.apache.org/about-people.html, the last three rows are 
 3/1/1 rather than two rows of 4/3.
 
 On Jan 30, 2013, at 4:22 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
 
 Hey everybody!
 
 We got final permission from a few different groups at Apache to make the
 website live.  If you have any pending commits to the site/ directory in
 SVN, please make sure those go in soon as things are about to be all moved
 around there.
 
 After the website goes live, I'll put in the download tracking code.
 
 -Nick
 


Re: [ASJS] AS to HTML5 in action: announcing the ASJS Publisher and the VanillaSDK JS framework.

2013-01-25 Thread Hans Van den Keybus
But if I understand it correctly, wouldn't it mean in Erik's model that when I 
create my own custom datagrid component for instance, I would also have to 
write a JS version for this? (For me personally this is what I would want to 
avoid -- writing JS myself :) )

Does anybody know what GWT is doing excactly and how the current paths we (the 
flexers) have choosen compare to that?
To me it seems pretty nice in GWT to be writing your own HTML, and just plug in 
your java (which then cross compiles).
Do you guys think this a good model?

(I'm not saying we should this or that, and that i think somebody is choosing 
the wrong path right now. I think all of you guys are doing an amazing job, and 
I wouldn't be able to do anything similar myself.
Just trying to make some discussion and gather info, because I think that is 
healthy, at all times)

And nice Job Erik, looking forward to experiment with it!!



On 25 Jan 2013, at 20:13, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:

 
 
 
 On 1/25/13 11:00 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
 
 2) Actually, I have the AS implementation completely finished... it's
 the Flex SDK (hence the 'vanilla' in the name). On the browser side
 I'll have to create a JS framework that has the same public API as the
 Flex SDK, but I never said that behind that API would be a translation
 of any unused code from the Flex SDK (would be silly, wouldn't it?),
 nor will it necessarily use the same intertwined dependencies.
 OK, I'll believe you, but one of the problems in the current Flex SDK is
 interwined dependencies caused by the use of complex classes in the API
 surface itself.  I'm not clear how you can fix that without changing the API
 surface.
 
 -- 
 Alex Harui
 Flex SDK Team
 Adobe Systems, Inc.
 http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
 


Re: HTML5 or Flex Framework

2013-01-23 Thread Hans Van den Keybus
True, but their initial idea was that all browsers would implement the dart vm, 
but microsoft (and others?) already made clear this wasn't going to happen.

Sent from my iPhone

On 23 Jan 2013, at 19:47, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@gmail.com wrote:

 Great Post.
 One thing tho
 
 On the other hand, Google’s Dart expect a browser to have a VM in addition
 to JavaScript engine.
 
 That s not true.
 Dart  has the ability to compile to JavaScript. No VM required.
 
 
 2013/1/23 Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl
 
 We are getting there. Stay tuned the coming days...
 
 EdB
 
 
 
 On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Rushme Nayak rushme.nay...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 *The Conversation never been better*
 *
 *
 All evangelists are happy to demo simple applications like Contact List
 to
 prove that HTML5 and their JavaScript framework is here to stay and is
 THE
 Framework to use. The rookie developers are often impressed by a demo of
 an
 HTML5 game moving objects using an HTML SVG element. To get cheap
 applauses
 at a Web conference you need to proclaim, “No more plugins like Flash or
 Silverlight. RIP!”. It’s even more effective than making fun of
 Internet...*
 *
 
 
 http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/2013/01/22/html5-or-flex-framework
 
 --
 Warm Regards,
 *Rush-me*
 
 
 
 --
 Ix Multimedia Software
 
 Jan Luykenstraat 27
 3521 VB Utrecht
 
 T. 06-51952295
 I. www.ixsoftware.nl