Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Dave Fisher]

Hi -

I am not available for anything until Saturday. I’m done.

I proposed the process as far as I can tell there is not even a consensus on 
what other names to vote on other than Royale. I consider this move to squash 
the vote to be steamrolling. I explained it yesterday to proceed in parallel.

There is no reason not to proceed with the VOTE. I am not rescinding it. Plenty 
of time was given to discuss this I gave a ballot and warned people what it 
would be.

Regards,
Dave

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I don't
> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alex
> 
> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
> 
>> No (binding)
>> 
>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
>> 
>>> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>>> 
>>> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
>>> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
>>> discussed.
>>> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
>>> 
>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>>> 
>> 
> 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Dave Fisher]

Is this a “No” Binding vote?

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Harbs  wrote:
> 
> +1 from me.
> 
>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
>> 
>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I don't
>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
>> 
>>> No (binding)
>>> 
>>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
>>> 
 VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
 
 [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
 [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
 discussed.
 [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
 
 The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
 
>>> 
>> 
> 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Dave Fisher]

Is this a No Binging VOTE?

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I don't
> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alex
> 
> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
> 
>> No (binding)
>> 
>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
>> 
>>> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>>> 
>>> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
>>> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
>>> discussed.
>>> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
>>> 
>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>>> 
>> 
> 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Dave Fisher]

Is this a No Binding VOTE?

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Piotr Zarzycki  
> wrote:
> 
> I see the consensus already,I'm sorry for the noise and insist for the VOTE
> guys. We may start VOTE on, a new name. Some folks were for YES to the old
> one, but I see that they are also open for the new name.
> 
> Piotr
> 
> 2017-09-14 20:28 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> 
>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I don't
>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
>> 
>>> No (binding)
>>> 
>>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
>>> 
 VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
 
 [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
 [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
 discussed.
 [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
 
 The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Piotr Zarzycki
> 
> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> skype: zarzycki10
> 
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
> 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Harbs]

Yes. I am willing to go along with changing the name and start a vote asap on 
what it should be.

As far as I’m concerned this vote can remain open and the second vote can 
proceed in parallel. If the first vote concludes with “yes”, then the second 
vote will be void. I don’t see that waiting to start a second vote until the 
first vote finishes is beneficial.

I’d REALLY like to have this wrapped up before the board meeting next week.

To be official:
No (binding)

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:55 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
> Is this a “No” Binding vote?
> 
>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Harbs  wrote:
>> 
>> +1 from me.
>> 
>>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I don't
>>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Alex
>>> 
>>> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
>>> 
 No (binding)
 
 On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
 
> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
> 
> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
> discussed.
> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
> 
> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
> 
 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Piotr Zarzycki]

NO (binding)

Carlos definitely helped me with the decision. He triggers me with MDL and
it was worth it, so I believe in his web design abilities and branding
super powers! :)
+1 for open vote with list of already proposed names, voters could propose
something outside list. At the end we can count everything.

Thanks,
Piotr

2017-09-14 21:21 GMT+02:00 Harbs :

> Yes. I am willing to go along with changing the name and start a vote asap
> on what it should be.
>
> As far as I’m concerned this vote can remain open and the second vote can
> proceed in parallel. If the first vote concludes with “yes”, then the
> second vote will be void. I don’t see that waiting to start a second vote
> until the first vote finishes is beneficial.
>
> I’d REALLY like to have this wrapped up before the board meeting next week.
>
> To be official:
> No (binding)
>
> > On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:55 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
> >
> > Is this a “No” Binding vote?
> >
> >> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Harbs  wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 from me.
> >>
> >>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Alex Harui 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I
> don't
> >>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
> >>>
>  No (binding)
> 
>  On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
> 
> > VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
> >
> > [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> > [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
> > discussed.
> > [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00
> UT.
> >
> 
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Dave Fisher]

Thank you and I agree so long as FlexJS is not on the second ballot.

I recommend a preference list.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Harbs  wrote:
> 
> Yes. I am willing to go along with changing the name and start a vote asap on 
> what it should be.
> 
> As far as I’m concerned this vote can remain open and the second vote can 
> proceed in parallel. If the first vote concludes with “yes”, then the second 
> vote will be void. I don’t see that waiting to start a second vote until the 
> first vote finishes is beneficial.
> 
> I’d REALLY like to have this wrapped up before the board meeting next week.
> 
> To be official:
> No (binding)
> 
>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:55 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
>> 
>> Is this a “No” Binding vote?
>> 
>>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Harbs  wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1 from me.
>>> 
 On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
 
 Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I don't
 want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
 
 Thanks,
 -Alex
 
> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
> 
> No (binding)
> 
>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
>> 
>> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>> 
>> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
>> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
>> discussed.
>> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
>> 
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>> 
> 
 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Dave Fisher]

Alex -you have not voted. Please vote folks.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 2:56 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
> Is this a No Binging VOTE?
> 
>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui  wrote:
>> 
>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I don't
>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>> 
>>> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
>>> 
>>> No (binding)
>>> 
 On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
 
 VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
 
 [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
 [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
 discussed.
 [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
 
 The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Alex Harui]

Abstain.  Gonna go with the flow...

On 9/15/17, 4:22 PM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:

>Alex -you have not voted. Please vote folks.
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 2:56 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
>> 
>> Is this a No Binging VOTE?
>> 
>>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui 
>>>wrote:
>>> 
>>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I
>>>don't
>>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Alex
>>> 
 On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
 
 No (binding)
 
> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
> 
> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
> 
> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
> discussed.
> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
> 
> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00
>UT.
> 
 
>>> 
>> 
>