[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0 RC1

[Alex Harui]

Vote passed with 4 +1 votes and 2 +0 votes.

Thanks everyone for voting.

-Alex

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0 RC1

[Alex Harui]

+1
Package 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/apache-flex-fl
exjs-0.5.0-src.tar.gz
Java 1.7
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives: y
No unapproved binaries: y



On 11/8/15, 1:35 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:

>+1 Binding
>
>Package 
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/apache-flex-f
>lexjs-0.5.0-src.tar.gz
>Java 1.7
>OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5
>Source kit signatures match: y
>Source kit builds: y
>README is ok: y
>RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
>NOTICE is ok: y
>LICENSE is ok: y
>No unapproved licenses or archives: y
>No unapproved binaries: y
>
>Harbs
>
>On Nov 6, 2015, at 10:47 PM, Peter Ent  wrote:
>
>> +1 Binding
>> 
>> Licenses: OK
>> ReadMe files: OK, no errors
>> Release Notes: OK
>> 
>> I was able to build everything, including examples.
>> Examples ran without errors or failing.
>> 
>> Peter Ent
>> Adobe Systems
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/2/15, 8:58 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> This is vote for the 0.5.0 release of Apache FlexJS.
>>> 
>>> The release candidate can be found here;
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/
>>> 
>>> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements
>>>on
>>> approving a release?', at:
>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>>> 
>>> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>>> - MD5 and signed packages are correct
>>> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>>> - That the build script completes successfully
>>> - That you can compile and cross-compile a simple example using the
>>>SDK.
>>> 
>>> The source package is set up the same way as the repo.  This means that
>>> the results of the build are not the same as an IDE-compatible SDK.
>>>The
>>> compiled source package can be used in combination with the FalconJX
>>> source package to compile some of the sample applications.
>>> 
>>> The most convenient way to use the binary package is to install it via
>>>Ant
>>> or the Installer.  To use an Installer you must use InstallApacheFlex
>>> version 3.1 or later.  You can get InstallApacheFlex here:
>>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=/flex/installer/3.1/binaries/
>>> 
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>> +1 Approve the release
>>> -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>>> 
>>> The vote passes if there is:
>>> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>>> - More positive votes than negative votes
>>> 
>>> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so I expect there
>>> will be many bugs found.  IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix
>>>bugs
>>> in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough
>>> functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it.
>>> 
>>> People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release
>>>and
>>> vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how
>>>the
>>> PMC votes.
>>> 
>>> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>>> version you tested with.
>>> 
>>> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
>>> steps to validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the
>>> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
>>> 1) create an empty folder,
>>> 2) download into that folder this file:
>>> 
>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/ApproveFlex
>>>JS
>>> .
>>> xml
>>> 3) run the script: ant -e -f ApproveFlexJS.xml -Drelease.version=0.5.0
>>> -Drc=1
>>> 
>>> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
>>>packages
>>> and build results are always encouraged.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
>>>not
>>> this VOTE thread.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alex Harui
>>> 
>> 
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0 RC1

[Harbs]

+1 Binding

Package 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/apache-flex-flexjs-0.5.0-src.tar.gz
Java 1.7
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives: y
No unapproved binaries: y

Harbs

On Nov 6, 2015, at 10:47 PM, Peter Ent  wrote:

> +1 Binding
> 
> Licenses: OK
> ReadMe files: OK, no errors
> Release Notes: OK
> 
> I was able to build everything, including examples.
> Examples ran without errors or failing.
> 
> Peter Ent
> Adobe Systems
> 
> 
> On 11/2/15, 8:58 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> This is vote for the 0.5.0 release of Apache FlexJS.
>> 
>> The release candidate can be found here;
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/
>> 
>> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
>> approving a release?', at:
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> 
>> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>> - MD5 and signed packages are correct
>> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>> - That the build script completes successfully
>> - That you can compile and cross-compile a simple example using the SDK.
>> 
>> The source package is set up the same way as the repo.  This means that
>> the results of the build are not the same as an IDE-compatible SDK.  The
>> compiled source package can be used in combination with the FalconJX
>> source package to compile some of the sample applications.
>> 
>> The most convenient way to use the binary package is to install it via Ant
>> or the Installer.  To use an Installer you must use InstallApacheFlex
>> version 3.1 or later.  You can get InstallApacheFlex here:
>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=/flex/installer/3.1/binaries/
>> 
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> +1 Approve the release
>> -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>> 
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>> 
>> The vote passes if there is:
>> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>> - More positive votes than negative votes
>> 
>> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so I expect there
>> will be many bugs found.  IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs
>> in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough
>> functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it.
>> 
>> People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and
>> vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the
>> PMC votes.
>> 
>> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>> version you tested with.
>> 
>> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
>> steps to validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the
>> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
>> 1) create an empty folder,
>> 2) download into that folder this file:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/ApproveFlexJS
>> .
>> xml
>> 3) run the script: ant -e -f ApproveFlexJS.xml -Drelease.version=0.5.0
>> -Drc=1
>> 
>> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
>> and build results are always encouraged.
>> 
>> 
>> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
>> this VOTE thread.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alex Harui
>> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0 RC1

[Peter Ent]

+1 Binding

Licenses: OK
ReadMe files: OK, no errors
Release Notes: OK

I was able to build everything, including examples.
Examples ran without errors or failing.

Peter Ent
Adobe Systems


On 11/2/15, 8:58 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

>Hi,
>
>This is vote for the 0.5.0 release of Apache FlexJS.
>
>The release candidate can be found here;
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/
>
>Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
>approving a release?', at:
>http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>
>At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>- MD5 and signed packages are correct
>- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>- That the build script completes successfully
>- That you can compile and cross-compile a simple example using the SDK.
>
>The source package is set up the same way as the repo.  This means that
>the results of the build are not the same as an IDE-compatible SDK.  The
>compiled source package can be used in combination with the FalconJX
>source package to compile some of the sample applications.
>
>The most convenient way to use the binary package is to install it via Ant
>or the Installer.  To use an Installer you must use InstallApacheFlex
>version 3.1 or later.  You can get InstallApacheFlex here:
>http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=/flex/installer/3.1/binaries/
>
>Please vote to approve this release:
>+1 Approve the release
>-1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
>This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
>The vote passes if there is:
>- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>- More positive votes than negative votes
>
>Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so I expect there
>will be many bugs found.  IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs
>in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough
>functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it.
>
>People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and
>vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the
>PMC votes.
>
>When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>version you tested with.
>
>For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
>steps to validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the
>package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
>1) create an empty folder,
>2) download into that folder this file:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/ApproveFlexJS
>.
>xml
>3) run the script: ant -e -f ApproveFlexJS.xml -Drelease.version=0.5.0
>-Drc=1
>
>You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
>and build results are always encouraged.
>
>
>Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
>this VOTE thread.
>
>Thanks,
>Alex Harui
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0 RC1

[Josh Tynjala]

+1 binding

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This is vote for the 0.5.0 release of Apache FlexJS.
>
> The release candidate can be found here;
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/
>
> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
> approving a release?', at:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>
> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> - MD5 and signed packages are correct
> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> - That the build script completes successfully
> - That you can compile and cross-compile a simple example using the SDK.
>
> The source package is set up the same way as the repo.  This means that
> the results of the build are not the same as an IDE-compatible SDK.  The
> compiled source package can be used in combination with the FalconJX
> source package to compile some of the sample applications.
>
> The most convenient way to use the binary package is to install it via Ant
> or the Installer.  To use an Installer you must use InstallApacheFlex
> version 3.1 or later.  You can get InstallApacheFlex here:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=/flex/installer/3.1/binaries/
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
> The vote passes if there is:
> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> - More positive votes than negative votes
>
> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so I expect there
> will be many bugs found.  IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs
> in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough
> functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it.
>
> People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and
> vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the
> PMC votes.
>
> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> version you tested with.
>
> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> steps to validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the
> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> 1) create an empty folder,
> 2) download into that folder this file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/ApproveFlexJS.
> xml
> 3) run the script: ant -e -f ApproveFlexJS.xml -Drelease.version=0.5.0
> -Drc=1
>
> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
> and build results are always encouraged.
>
>
> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
> this VOTE thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex Harui
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0 RC1

[Nicholas Kwiatkowski]

+0

- Hashes OK
- Signatures OK
- LICENSE OK
- NOTICE OK
- Licenses seem to be in place and correct.

I wasn't able to compile fully from source.  Most likely
an environmental thing on my side -- I've not done much with the JS SDKs
and have not tested much of them to know if this is release or my issue.

-Nick

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This is vote for the 0.5.0 release of Apache FlexJS.
>
> The release candidate can be found here;
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/
>
> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
> approving a release?', at:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>
> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> - MD5 and signed packages are correct
> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> - That the build script completes successfully
> - That you can compile and cross-compile a simple example using the SDK.
>
> The source package is set up the same way as the repo.  This means that
> the results of the build are not the same as an IDE-compatible SDK.  The
> compiled source package can be used in combination with the FalconJX
> source package to compile some of the sample applications.
>
> The most convenient way to use the binary package is to install it via Ant
> or the Installer.  To use an Installer you must use InstallApacheFlex
> version 3.1 or later.  You can get InstallApacheFlex here:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=/flex/installer/3.1/binaries/
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
> The vote passes if there is:
> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> - More positive votes than negative votes
>
> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so I expect there
> will be many bugs found.  IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs
> in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough
> functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it.
>
> People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and
> vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the
> PMC votes.
>
> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> version you tested with.
>
> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> steps to validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the
> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> 1) create an empty folder,
> 2) download into that folder this file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/ApproveFlexJS.
> xml
> 3) run the script: ant -e -f ApproveFlexJS.xml -Drelease.version=0.5.0
> -Drc=1
>
> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
> and build results are always encouraged.
>
>
> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
> this VOTE thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex Harui
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0 RC1

[Alex Harui]

Can you provide more details of the error and your setup in the DISCUSS
thread?  It might be nice to know if there are common issues.

Also, if you have time, it would be nice to know if the Approval script
can successfully build the source kit for you or not.

Thanks,
-Alex
On 11/5/15, 2:51 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski"
 wrote:

>>For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
>> steps to validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the
>> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
>> 1) create an empty folder,
>> 2) download into that folder this file:
>> 
>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.5.0/rc1/ApproveFlexJ
>>S.xml
>> 3) run the script: ant -e -f ApproveFlexJS.xml -Drelease.version=0.5.0
>>-Drc=1
>>
>> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
>>packages
>> and build results are always encouraged.
>>
>>
>> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
>>not
>> this VOTE thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex Harui
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0 RC1

[Alex Harui]

On 11/3/15, 9:23 PM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:
>
>Are we the "original software by Adobe etc etc” lines in NOTICE i.e. is
>there any donated code in the source release?

Yeah, some launch scripts, snippets of data binding support and other code
snippets can be considered copies from the original Flex SDK.

-Alex

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0 RC1

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+0 binding. Will change to +1 when I can get the source release to compile and 
test it. [1]

For the source I checked:
-  hashes and signatures good
- LICENSE OK
- NOTICE OK
- No unexpected binaries
- All source files have headers
- unable to compile from source

Are we the "original software by Adobe etc etc” lines in NOTICE i.e. is there 
any donated code in the source release?

Other than the minor NOTICE issue mentioned above the binary LICENSE and NOTICE 
are also good.

Thanks,
Justin

1. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release