Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0
-1 Binding See details in the [DISCUSS] thread. Thanks, Om On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, +1 binding - packages name etc good - LICENSE needs to be double checked by someone else but at the moment I can't seen anything that need to be added to the standard boillerplate - NOTICE good - README and RELEASE_NOTE fine - source package contains no binary files - all source files have apache header - can compile swcs from source package - could get simple example working Minor issues: - One swc doubles up on ApacheFlex name - Would be nice to have better instructions on how to use these swcs - A few directories and files still have Adobe in there name, probably should rename - This file [1] contains trademarked / company names and should be changed to something else - perhaps swap points 3 and 4 in README Thanks, Justin 1. main/Tools/AdobeSpellingDictGen/sample/sampleWordList.txt
Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0
Hi, -1 Binding Which issues do you think are actual blockers? Thanks, Justin
Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, -1 Binding Which issues do you think are actual blockers? 1, 2 and 5. Thanks, Om Thanks, Justin
Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0
-1 just because the final license wasn't in the kit and we need to figure out the dictionary dependencies. Otherwise, good enough for a 1.0. Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/squiggly/1.0/rc0/apache-flex-sq uiggly-1.0-src.tar.gz Java 1.7 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.8.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives: y No unapproved binaries: y On 8/27/14 6:13 PM, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@me.com wrote: Hi, This is a Squiggly Release Candidate 0. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README. As this is the first release please check it carefully as there are likely to be some issues. The release candidate can be found here; https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/squiggly/1.0/rc0/ Before voting please review the section,What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?, at: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release Please vote to approve this release: +1 Approve the release -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours or (more likely) as long as needed. The vote passes if there is: - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC - More positive votes than negative votes People who are not in PMC or who are not an committer are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes will not be binding. Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not this VOTE thread. Thanks, Justin
[VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0
Hi, This is a Squiggly Release Candidate 0. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README. As this is the first release please check it carefully as there are likely to be some issues. The release candidate can be found here; https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/squiggly/1.0/rc0/ Before voting please review the section,What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?, at: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release Please vote to approve this release: +1 Approve the release -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours or (more likely) as long as needed. The vote passes if there is: - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC - More positive votes than negative votes People who are not in PMC or who are not an committer are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes will not be binding. Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not this VOTE thread. Thanks, Justin
Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0
Hi, +1 binding - packages name etc good - LICENSE needs to be double checked by someone else but at the moment I can't seen anything that need to be added to the standard boillerplate - NOTICE good - README and RELEASE_NOTE fine - source package contains no binary files - all source files have apache header - can compile swcs from source package - could get simple example working Minor issues: - One swc doubles up on ApacheFlex name - Would be nice to have better instructions on how to use these swcs - A few directories and files still have Adobe in there name, probably should rename - This file [1] contains trademarked / company names and should be changed to something else - perhaps swap points 3 and 4 in README Thanks, Justin 1. main/Tools/AdobeSpellingDictGen/sample/sampleWordList.txt
