Just to understand the current Position: - Alex is currently the chair and would volunteer to continue, but never has stated that he would aktually like to stay in that Position (It's more the others stating that they would want him to stay) - Justin actively would like to be the chair and would also be capable of doing so
Currently it Looks as if Alex wouldn't mind passing on the Position to Justin and Justin would really like to do the Job? And if the chair Position has nothing to do with Alex' involvement with the Flex Project, wouldn't this give him even more time to do non-beaurocratic stuff? Then he could concentrate his time on delivering code and not for delivering reports? Just my thoughts to the discussion. Chris ________________________________________ Von: Justin Mclean [jus...@classsoftware.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2013 08:16 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex December 2013 Report Hi, IMO he's not clearly stated that he will stand for another year and yes the choice is his. The board report seems to me to be a good place to state that. When putting the guidelines together consensus was that the chair should be for a year or reviewed every year. There may be other PMC members who would also like to have a turn at being the chair. There does seem some support for changing the chair (see the other discuss thread on that) but there's certainly not a consensus either way, up to Alex to consider and decide. Again I think everyone can agree he's done a good job and will continue to do so, but it may also be good to change and spread the experience about. Looking back to when Alex was voted in it was pointed out by the mentors that there should of been more discussion on who should be chair. [1] Now seems a good time to have that discussion. Thanks, Justin 1. http://markmail.org/message/3cljrqmwfipsq7zn
