Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.2 RC4
+1 (binding) Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/falcon/0.0.2/rc4/apache-flex-fa lconjx-0.0.2-src.tar.gz Java 1.7 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.8.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y README_JX is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES_JX is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y NOTICE_JX is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives: y No unapproved binaries: y On 7/12/14 7:45 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Hi, > >This is vote for the second (0.0.2) release of the FalconJX (and Falcon) >compilers. I am not proposing a separate Falcon-only release package at >this time. The only purpose of the FalconJX packages are to serve as >upstream packages for the FlexJS release. > >The release candidate can be found here; >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/falcon/0.0.2/rc4/ > >Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on >approving a release?", at: >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > >At a minimum you would be expected to check that: >- MD5 and signed packages are correct >- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine >- As this is the first release please carefully check the LICENSE and >NOTICE files >- That the build script completes successfully >- That you can compile using the results of building the source package > >The source package is set up the same way as the repo. This means that >the results of the build are not the same as the binary package. The >compiled source package can be used to build FlexJS apps via the command >line and Ant, but not in Flash Builder or other IDEs. I tested the source >package by building it, then pointing to it from the source package of the >FlexJS release candidate and building the examples in the FlexJS package. > >The binary package is set up as an upstream package for the FlexJS >release. The most convenient way to use the binary package is to install >a FlexJS SDK via Ant or the Installer. > >Please vote to approve this release: >+1 Approve the release >-1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why) > >This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. > >The vote passes if there is: >- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC >- More positive votes than negative votes > >Remember that this is an initial 'alpha-quality' release so I expect there >will be many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs >in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough >functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it. > >People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and >vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the >PMC votes. > >When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR >version you tested FlexUnit with. > >Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not >this VOTE thread. > >For your convenience there is an ant script that automates the common >steps to validate a >release. Instead of individually downloading the package and signature >files, unzipping, etc, you can instead: >1) create an empty folder, >2) download into that folder this file: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/falcon/0.0.2/rc4/ApproveFalcon >. >xml >3) run the script: ant -e -f ApproveFalcon.xml -Drelease.version=0.0.2 >-Drc=4 > >You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages >and build results are always encouraged. > >Thanks, >Alex > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.2 RC4
+1 YES - MD5 and signed packages are correct YES - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine YES - As this is the first release please carefully check the LICENSE and NOTICE files YES - That the build script completes successfully YES - That you can compile using the results of building the source package Note: tests ran and I created a new FlexJS overlay using this installation and built and ran several examples. Peter Ent Adobe Systems On 7/12/14 10:45 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Hi, > >This is vote for the second (0.0.2) release of the FalconJX (and Falcon) >compilers. I am not proposing a separate Falcon-only release package at >this time. The only purpose of the FalconJX packages are to serve as >upstream packages for the FlexJS release. > >The release candidate can be found here; >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/falcon/0.0.2/rc4/ > >Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on >approving a release?", at: >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > >At a minimum you would be expected to check that: >- MD5 and signed packages are correct >- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine >- As this is the first release please carefully check the LICENSE and >NOTICE files >- That the build script completes successfully >- That you can compile using the results of building the source package > >The source package is set up the same way as the repo. This means that >the results of the build are not the same as the binary package. The >compiled source package can be used to build FlexJS apps via the command >line and Ant, but not in Flash Builder or other IDEs. I tested the source >package by building it, then pointing to it from the source package of the >FlexJS release candidate and building the examples in the FlexJS package. > >The binary package is set up as an upstream package for the FlexJS >release. The most convenient way to use the binary package is to install >a FlexJS SDK via Ant or the Installer. > >Please vote to approve this release: >+1 Approve the release >-1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why) > >This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. > >The vote passes if there is: >- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC >- More positive votes than negative votes > >Remember that this is an initial 'alpha-quality' release so I expect there >will be many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs >in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough >functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it. > >People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and >vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the >PMC votes. > >When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR >version you tested FlexUnit with. > >Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not >this VOTE thread. > >For your convenience there is an ant script that automates the common >steps to validate a >release. Instead of individually downloading the package and signature >files, unzipping, etc, you can instead: >1) create an empty folder, >2) download into that folder this file: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/falcon/0.0.2/rc4/ApproveFalcon >. >xml >3) run the script: ant -e -f ApproveFalcon.xml -Drelease.version=0.0.2 >-Drc=4 > >You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages >and build results are always encouraged. > >Thanks, >Alex > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.2 RC4
Hi, +1 binding - signatures and md5 good - LICENSE and NOTICE good - No binary files in source release - All source files have correct headers - can compile from source - tests pass Thanks, Justin