Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0
-1 just because the final license wasn't in the kit and we need to figure out the dictionary dependencies. Otherwise, good enough for a 1.0. Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/squiggly/1.0/rc0/apache-flex-sq uiggly-1.0-src.tar.gz Java 1.7 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.8.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives: y No unapproved binaries: y On 8/27/14 6:13 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >This is a Squiggly Release Candidate 0. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and >the README. > >As this is the first release please check it carefully as there are >likely to be some issues. > >The release candidate can be found here; >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/squiggly/1.0/rc0/ > >Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on >approving a release?", at: >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > >Please vote to approve this release: >+1 Approve the release >-1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why) > >This vote will be open for at least 72 hours or (more likely) as long as >needed. > >The vote passes if there is: >- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC >- More positive votes than negative votes > >People who are not in PMC or who are not an committer are also encouraged >to test out the release and vote, although their votes will not be >binding. > >Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not >this VOTE thread. > >Thanks, >Justin
Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > -1 Binding > Which issues do you think are actual blockers? > > 1, 2 and 5. Thanks, Om > Thanks, > Justin >
Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0
Hi, > -1 Binding Which issues do you think are actual blockers? Thanks, Justin
Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0
-1 Binding See details in the [DISCUSS] thread. Thanks, Om On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 binding > - packages name etc good > - LICENSE needs to be double checked by someone else but at the moment I > can't seen anything that need to be added to the standard boillerplate > - NOTICE good > - README and RELEASE_NOTE fine > - source package contains no binary files > - all source files have apache header > - can compile swcs from source package > - could get simple example working > > Minor issues: > - One swc doubles up on ApacheFlex name > - Would be nice to have better instructions on how to use these swcs > - A few directories and files still have "Adobe" in there name, probably > should rename > - This file [1] contains trademarked / company names and should be changed > to something else > - perhaps swap points 3 and 4 in README > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. main/Tools/AdobeSpellingDictGen/sample/sampleWordList.txt > >
Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0
Hi, +1 binding - packages name etc good - LICENSE needs to be double checked by someone else but at the moment I can't seen anything that need to be added to the standard boillerplate - NOTICE good - README and RELEASE_NOTE fine - source package contains no binary files - all source files have apache header - can compile swcs from source package - could get simple example working Minor issues: - One swc doubles up on ApacheFlex name - Would be nice to have better instructions on how to use these swcs - A few directories and files still have "Adobe" in there name, probably should rename - This file [1] contains trademarked / company names and should be changed to something else - perhaps swap points 3 and 4 in README Thanks, Justin 1. main/Tools/AdobeSpellingDictGen/sample/sampleWordList.txt
