This is an expected feature, as we also experienced browser crashes on existing 
operator-level flame graphs

Best,
Echo Lee

> 在 2022年1月24日,下午6:16,David Morávek <david.mora...@gmail.com> 写道:
> 
> Hi Jacky,
> 
> The link seems to be broken, here is the correct one [1].
> 
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-213%3A+TaskManager%27s+Flame+Graphs
> 
> Best,
> D.
> 
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 9:48 AM Jacky Lau <281293...@qq.com.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; I would like to start the discussion on FLIP-213 <
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-213%3A+TaskManager%27s+Flame+Graphs&gt
>> ;
>> &nbsp;which aims to provide taskmanager level(process level) flame graph
>> by async profiler, which is most popular tool in java performance. and the
>> arthas and intellij both use it.&nbsp;
>> And we support it in our ant group company.
>> &nbsp; &nbsp;And&nbsp;Flink supports FLIP-165: Operator's Flame Graphs
>> now. and it draw flame graph by the&nbsp;front-end
>> libraries&nbsp;d3-flame-graph, which has some problem in&nbsp; jobs
>> of&nbsp;large of parallelism.
>> &nbsp; &nbsp;Please be aware that the FLIP wiki area is not fully done
>> since i don't konw whether it will accept by flink&nbsp;community.&nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp;Feel free to add your thoughts to make this feature better! i
>> am looking forward&nbsp; to all your response. Thanks too much!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best Jacky Lau

Reply via email to