[DISCUSS] Creating Kubernetes Operator release 1.6.1
Hi All! I would like to propose to release the 1.6.1 patch version for the Kubernetes operator. The release branch currently contains 2-3 critical fixes for issues that many users have hit over time. Making this release now would allow us more time to wrap up and finalize the 1.7.0 release changes (some of which are quite big regarding the autoscaler) If there are no objections I will prepare the release candidate. The changeset is minimal but very important. Cheers, Gyula
Re: [DISCUSS] Creating Kubernetes Operator release 1.6.1
Hi Gyula, Thank you for driving this discussion! This release seems good to me, I have a question: I see some bugfix commits have been merged into the 1.6-release branch. Does it already contain all recent bugfix commits? Also, you said in the `Kubernetes Operator 1.6.0 release planning`[1]: > I am volunteering as the release manager but if someone else wants to do it, I would also be happy to simply give assistance :) It's a minor version. For those who have never released before, a minor version may be a good entry point. Would you mind if I volunteer as the release manager for 1.6.1? [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/5ynjv18nfoj6rvyhlz1g5y8qtxx6v1gd Best, Rui On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 1:06 PM Gyula Fóra wrote: > Hi All! > > I would like to propose to release the 1.6.1 patch version for the > Kubernetes operator. The release branch currently contains 2-3 critical > fixes for issues that many users have hit over time. > > Making this release now would allow us more time to wrap up and finalize > the 1.7.0 release changes (some of which are quite big regarding the > autoscaler) > > If there are no objections I will prepare the release candidate. The > changeset is minimal but very important. > > Cheers, > Gyula >
Re: [DISCUSS] Creating Kubernetes Operator release 1.6.1
Thanks Rui, I would appreciate your help. Let's sync on the tasks offline. As for the bugfix commits. We can take a quick look and backport some other fixes if needed but we should focus on critical fixes / regressions to make the changes minimal given that the 1.7.0 is not so far anyway :) Cheers, Gyula On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 8:20 AM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gyula, > > Thank you for driving this discussion! > > This release seems good to me, I have a question: > I see some bugfix commits have been merged into > the 1.6-release branch. Does it already contain all > recent bugfix commits? > > Also, you said in the `Kubernetes Operator 1.6.0 release planning`[1]: > > > I am volunteering as the release manager but if someone else wants to do > it, I would also be happy to simply give assistance :) > > It's a minor version. For those who have never released before, > a minor version may be a good entry point. Would you mind > if I volunteer as the release manager for 1.6.1? > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/5ynjv18nfoj6rvyhlz1g5y8qtxx6v1gd > > Best, > Rui > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 1:06 PM Gyula Fóra wrote: > > > Hi All! > > > > I would like to propose to release the 1.6.1 patch version for the > > Kubernetes operator. The release branch currently contains 2-3 critical > > fixes for issues that many users have hit over time. > > > > Making this release now would allow us more time to wrap up and finalize > > the 1.7.0 release changes (some of which are quite big regarding the > > autoscaler) > > > > If there are no objections I will prepare the release candidate. The > > changeset is minimal but very important. > > > > Cheers, > > Gyula > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Creating Kubernetes Operator release 1.6.1
Hi devs, I checked all commits that the main branch has but release-1.6 branch doesn't, all of them are improvements instead of bug fixes. So I will prepare the 1.6.1-rc1 based on the latest release-1.6 branch. Please let me know if any critical commit is missed at release-1.6 branch, thanks~ And thanks Gyula's help! Best, Rui On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 2:25 PM Gyula Fóra wrote: > Thanks Rui, > I would appreciate your help. Let's sync on the tasks offline. > > As for the bugfix commits. We can take a quick look and backport some other > fixes if needed but we should focus on critical fixes / regressions to make > the changes minimal given that the 1.7.0 is not so far anyway :) > > Cheers, > Gyula > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 8:20 AM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Gyula, > > > > Thank you for driving this discussion! > > > > This release seems good to me, I have a question: > > I see some bugfix commits have been merged into > > the 1.6-release branch. Does it already contain all > > recent bugfix commits? > > > > Also, you said in the `Kubernetes Operator 1.6.0 release planning`[1]: > > > > > I am volunteering as the release manager but if someone else wants to > do > > it, I would also be happy to simply give assistance :) > > > > It's a minor version. For those who have never released before, > > a minor version may be a good entry point. Would you mind > > if I volunteer as the release manager for 1.6.1? > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/5ynjv18nfoj6rvyhlz1g5y8qtxx6v1gd > > > > Best, > > Rui > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 1:06 PM Gyula Fóra wrote: > > > > > Hi All! > > > > > > I would like to propose to release the 1.6.1 patch version for the > > > Kubernetes operator. The release branch currently contains 2-3 critical > > > fixes for issues that many users have hit over time. > > > > > > Making this release now would allow us more time to wrap up and > finalize > > > the 1.7.0 release changes (some of which are quite big regarding the > > > autoscaler) > > > > > > If there are no objections I will prepare the release candidate. The > > > changeset is minimal but very important. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Gyula > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Creating Kubernetes Operator release 1.6.1
Thank you Rui, sounds good! Gyula On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 11:14 AM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi devs, > > I checked all commits that the main branch has but release-1.6 branch > doesn't, > all of them are improvements instead of bug fixes. So I will prepare the > 1.6.1-rc1 based on the latest release-1.6 branch. > > Please let me know if any critical commit is missed at release-1.6 branch, > thanks~ > > And thanks Gyula's help! > > Best, > Rui > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 2:25 PM Gyula Fóra wrote: > >> Thanks Rui, >> I would appreciate your help. Let's sync on the tasks offline. >> >> As for the bugfix commits. We can take a quick look and backport some >> other >> fixes if needed but we should focus on critical fixes / regressions to >> make >> the changes minimal given that the 1.7.0 is not so far anyway :) >> >> Cheers, >> Gyula >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 8:20 AM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi Gyula, >> > >> > Thank you for driving this discussion! >> > >> > This release seems good to me, I have a question: >> > I see some bugfix commits have been merged into >> > the 1.6-release branch. Does it already contain all >> > recent bugfix commits? >> > >> > Also, you said in the `Kubernetes Operator 1.6.0 release planning`[1]: >> > >> > > I am volunteering as the release manager but if someone else wants to >> do >> > it, I would also be happy to simply give assistance :) >> > >> > It's a minor version. For those who have never released before, >> > a minor version may be a good entry point. Would you mind >> > if I volunteer as the release manager for 1.6.1? >> > >> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/5ynjv18nfoj6rvyhlz1g5y8qtxx6v1gd >> > >> > Best, >> > Rui >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 1:06 PM Gyula Fóra >> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi All! >> > > >> > > I would like to propose to release the 1.6.1 patch version for the >> > > Kubernetes operator. The release branch currently contains 2-3 >> critical >> > > fixes for issues that many users have hit over time. >> > > >> > > Making this release now would allow us more time to wrap up and >> finalize >> > > the 1.7.0 release changes (some of which are quite big regarding the >> > > autoscaler) >> > > >> > > If there are no objections I will prepare the release candidate. The >> > > changeset is minimal but very important. >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Gyula >> > > >> > >> >
