Re: [VOTE] FLIP-142: Disentangle StateBackends from Checkpointing
+1 (binding) Cheers, Till On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 5:04 PM Kostas Kloudas wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Kostas > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:57 PM Yu Li wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks all for the patience of answering / addressing my questions in the > > discussion thread. > > > > Best Regards, > > Yu > > > > > > On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 14:39, Dawid Wysakowicz > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On 17/09/2020 07:19, Congxian Qiu wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Congxian > > > > > > > > > > > > David Anderson 于2020年9月15日周二 下午11:38写道： > > > > > > > >> +1 (binding) > > > >> > > > >> David > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:25 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > > tzuli...@apache.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> +1 (binding) > > > >>> > > > >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:26 PM Aljoscha Krettek < > aljos...@apache.org> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Aljoscha > > > > > > > > > >
[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-142: Disentangle StateBackends from Checkpointing
Hi all, The voting time for FLIP-142 has passed. I'm closing the vote now. - Konstantin (binding) - David Anderson (binding) - Gordon (binding) - Congxian - David Wysakowicz (binding) - Aljoscha (binding) - Yu (binding) - Kostas (binding) Including myself, there were 9 votes, 8 binding. There were no disapproving votes. Thus, FLIP-142 has been accepted. Thanks, everyone for joining the discussion and giving feedback! Best, Seth
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-142: Disentangle StateBackends from Checkpointing
+1 (binding) Kostas On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:57 PM Yu Li wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks all for the patience of answering / addressing my questions in the > discussion thread. > > Best Regards, > Yu > > > On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 14:39, Dawid Wysakowicz > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On 17/09/2020 07:19, Congxian Qiu wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Best, > > > Congxian > > > > > > > > > David Anderson 于2020年9月15日周二 下午11:38写道： > > > > > >> +1 (binding) > > >> > > >> David > > >> > > >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:25 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > tzuli...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 (binding) > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:26 PM Aljoscha Krettek > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > +1 (binding) > > > > Aljoscha > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-142: Disentangle StateBackends from Checkpointing
+1 (binding) Thanks all for the patience of answering / addressing my questions in the discussion thread. Best Regards, Yu On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 14:39, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 17/09/2020 07:19, Congxian Qiu wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Best, > > Congxian > > > > > > David Anderson 于2020年9月15日周二 下午11:38写道： > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> David > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:25 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > tzuli...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:26 PM Aljoscha Krettek > >>> wrote: > >>> > +1 (binding) > > Aljoscha > > >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-142: Disentangle StateBackends from Checkpointing
+1 (binding) On 17/09/2020 07:19, Congxian Qiu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Congxian > > > David Anderson 于2020年9月15日周二 下午11:38写道： > >> +1 (binding) >> >> David >> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:25 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:26 PM Aljoscha Krettek >>> wrote: >>> +1 (binding) Aljoscha signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-142: Disentangle StateBackends from Checkpointing
+1 (non-binding) Best, Congxian David Anderson 于2020年9月15日周二 下午11:38写道： > +1 (binding) > > David > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:25 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:26 PM Aljoscha Krettek > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Aljoscha > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-142: Disentangle StateBackends from Checkpointing
+1 (binding) David On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:25 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:26 PM Aljoscha Krettek > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Aljoscha > > >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-142: Disentangle StateBackends from Checkpointing
+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:26 PM Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Aljoscha >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-142: Disentangle StateBackends from Checkpointing
+1 (binding) Aljoscha
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-142: Disentangle StateBackends from Checkpointing
+1 (binding) On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:05 PM Seth Wiesman wrote: > Hi all, > > After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting thread for > FLIP-142 [2] which discusses disentangling state backends from > checkpointing. > > The vote will be open until 16th September (72h), unless there is an > objection or not enough votes. > > Seth > > [1] > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-142-Disentangle-StateBackends-from-Checkpointing-td44496.html > [2] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-142%3A+Disentangle+StateBackends+from+Checkpointing > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk
[VOTE] FLIP-142: Disentangle StateBackends from Checkpointing
Hi all, After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting thread for FLIP-142 [2] which discusses disentangling state backends from checkpointing. The vote will be open until 16th September (72h), unless there is an objection or not enough votes. Seth [1] http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-142-Disentangle-StateBackends-from-Checkpointing-td44496.html [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-142%3A+Disentangle+StateBackends+from+Checkpointing
