Re: [VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
+1 (non-binding) Best Regards Ahmed Hamdy On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 05:33, ConradJam wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Biao Geng 于2024年4月26日周五 18:45写道： > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Best, > > Biao Geng > > > > > > gongzhongqiang 于2024年4月26日周五 00:41写道： > > > > > +1( (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > Zhongqiang Gong > > > > > > Mate Czagany 于2024年4月24日周三 16:06写道： > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State > > > > Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an > > objection > > > or > > > > insufficient votes. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD > > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Mate > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best > > ConradJam >
[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
Hi all, I'm happy to announce that FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD [1] has been accepted with 9 approving votes (4 binding) [2]. I would like to thank everyone who took part in the discussion and/or voted. - Rui Fan (binding) - Ferenc Csaky (non-binding) - Gyula Fora (binding) - Yuepeng Pan (non-binding) - Thomas Weise (binding) - Robert Metzger (binding) - gongzhongqiang (non-binding) - Biao Geng (non-binding) - ConradJam (non-binding) Regards, Mate [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/lp2j5o9mtnfdv0ftyb04t5cz8nvw2vbm
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
+1 (non-binding) Biao Geng 于2024年4月26日周五 18:45写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Biao Geng > > > gongzhongqiang 于2024年4月26日周五 00:41写道： > > > +1( (non-binding) > > > > > > Best, > > Zhongqiang Gong > > > > Mate Czagany 于2024年4月24日周三 16:06写道： > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State > > > Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an > objection > > or > > > insufficient votes. > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 > > > > > > Regards, > > > Mate > > > > > > -- Best ConradJam
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
+1 (non-binding) Best, Biao Geng gongzhongqiang 于2024年4月26日周五 00:41写道： > +1( (non-binding) > > > Best, > Zhongqiang Gong > > Mate Czagany 于2024年4月24日周三 16:06写道： > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State > > Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection > or > > insufficient votes. > > > > [1] > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 > > > > Regards, > > Mate > > >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
+1( (non-binding) Best, Zhongqiang Gong Mate Czagany 于2024年4月24日周三 16:06写道： > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State > Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection or > insufficient votes. > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 > > Regards, > Mate >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
Ah, true -- now I remember. Thanks for fixing the wiki page +1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:40 PM Gyula Fóra wrote: > That's my fault @Robert Metzger , since the new FLIP > process and a lack of confluent access for non-committers this is a bit > tricky to get it sync :) > > Gyula > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:17 PM Robert Metzger > wrote: > > > In principle I'm +1 on the proposal, but I think the FLIP in the wiki is > > not in sync with the Google doc. > > For example in the Wiki FlinkStateSnapshotSpec.backoffLimit is missing. > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 3:27 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:14 AM Yuepeng Pan > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1(non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Yuepeng Pan > > > > > > > > At 2024-04-24 16:05:07, "Rui Fan" <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >+1(binding) > > > > > > > > > >Best, > > > > >Rui > > > > > > > > > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:03 PM Mate Czagany > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hi everyone, > > > > >> > > > > >> I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator > State > > > > >> Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. > > > > >> > > > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an > > > > objection or > > > > >> insufficient votes. > > > > >> > > > > >> [1] > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD > > > > >> [2] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 > > > > >> > > > > >> Regards, > > > > >> Mate > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
That's my fault @Robert Metzger , since the new FLIP process and a lack of confluent access for non-committers this is a bit tricky to get it sync :) Gyula On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:17 PM Robert Metzger wrote: > In principle I'm +1 on the proposal, but I think the FLIP in the wiki is > not in sync with the Google doc. > For example in the Wiki FlinkStateSnapshotSpec.backoffLimit is missing. > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 3:27 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:14 AM Yuepeng Pan > wrote: > > > > > +1(non-binding) > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > Yuepeng Pan > > > > > > At 2024-04-24 16:05:07, "Rui Fan" <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >+1(binding) > > > > > > > >Best, > > > >Rui > > > > > > > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:03 PM Mate Czagany > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi everyone, > > > >> > > > >> I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State > > > >> Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. > > > >> > > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an > > > objection or > > > >> insufficient votes. > > > >> > > > >> [1] > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD > > > >> [2] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> Mate > > > >> > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
In principle I'm +1 on the proposal, but I think the FLIP in the wiki is not in sync with the Google doc. For example in the Wiki FlinkStateSnapshotSpec.backoffLimit is missing. On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 3:27 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:14 AM Yuepeng Pan wrote: > > > +1(non-binding) > > > > > > Best, > > Yuepeng Pan > > > > At 2024-04-24 16:05:07, "Rui Fan" <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >+1(binding) > > > > > >Best, > > >Rui > > > > > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:03 PM Mate Czagany > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi everyone, > > >> > > >> I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State > > >> Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. > > >> > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an > > objection or > > >> insufficient votes. > > >> > > >> [1] > > >> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD > > >> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Mate > > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
+1 (binding) On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:14 AM Yuepeng Pan wrote: > +1(non-binding) > > > Best, > Yuepeng Pan > > At 2024-04-24 16:05:07, "Rui Fan" <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >+1(binding) > > > >Best, > >Rui > > > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:03 PM Mate Czagany wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State > >> Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an > objection or > >> insufficient votes. > >> > >> [1] > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD > >> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 > >> > >> Regards, > >> Mate > >> >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
+1(non-binding) Best, Yuepeng Pan At 2024-04-24 16:05:07, "Rui Fan" <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: >+1(binding) > >Best, >Rui > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:03 PM Mate Czagany wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State >> Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection or >> insufficient votes. >> >> [1] >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD >> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 >> >> Regards, >> Mate >>
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
+1(binding) Best, Rui On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:03 PM Mate Czagany wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State > Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection or > insufficient votes. > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 > > Regards, > Mate >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
+1 (binding) Gyula On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:07 AM Ferenc Csaky wrote: > +1 (non-binding), looking forward to this! > > Best, > Ferenc > > > > > On Wednesday, April 24th, 2024 at 10:03, Mate Czagany > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State > > Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection > or > > insufficient votes. > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 > > > > Regards, > > Mate >
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
+1 (non-binding), looking forward to this! Best, Ferenc On Wednesday, April 24th, 2024 at 10:03, Mate Czagany wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State > Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection or > insufficient votes. > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 > > Regards, > Mate
[VOTE] FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD
Hi everyone, I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection or insufficient votes. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 Regards, Mate
