Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-28 Thread Dawid Wysakowicz
@Yun Yes, I created the ticket with target version 2.0.0, which was
agreed by deprecating the method ;) I will soon start a vote for
actually removing it in 1.12 and if we agree on that I will change the
target version.

On 28/08/2020 09:33, Yun Tang wrote:
> I noticed that the ticket to remove deprecated DataStream#fold() [1] has been 
> created but not yet reach an agreement or assigned.
>
> Actually fold related function and state descriptions has been deprecated for 
> long than 3 years, and I think it's okay to remove such kind of state now.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19035
>
> Best,
> Yun Tang
> 
> From: Aljoscha Krettek 
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 16:45
> To: dev@flink.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API
>
> Did you consider DataStream.project() yet? In general I think we should
> remove most of the relational-ish methods from DataStream. More
> candidates in this set of methods would be the tuple index/expression
> methods for aggregations like min/max etc...
>
> Aljoscha
>
> On 25.08.20 20:52, Konstantin Knauf wrote:
>> I would argue that the guarantees of @Public methods that became
>> ineffective were broken when they became ineffective (and were deprecated).
>>
>> - ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
>> - ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)
>>
>> Removing these methods seems like the better of two evils to me as it shows
>> users that they have been using no-ops for some time.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 10:50 AM Stephan Ewen  wrote:
>>
>>> We have removed some public methods in the past, after a careful
>>> deprecation period, if they were not well working any more.
>>>
>>> The sentiment I got from users is that careful cleanup is in fact
>>> appreciated, otherwise things get confusing over time (the deprecated
>>> methods cause noise in the API).
>>> Still, we need to be very careful here.
>>>
>>> I would suggest to
>>>- start with the non-public breaking methods
>>>- remove fold() (very long deprecated)
>>>- remove split() buggy
>>>
>>> Removing the env.socketStream() and env.fileStream() methods would
>>> probably be good, too. They are very long deprecated and they don't work
>>> well (with checkpoints) and the sources are the first thing a user needs to
>>> understand when starting with Flink, so removing noise there is super
>>> helpful.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:53 AM Dawid Wysakowicz 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Till,
>>>>
>>>> You've got a good point here. Removing some of the methods would cause
>>>> breaking the stability guarantees. I do understand if we decide not to
>>>> remove them for that reason, let me explain though why I am thinking it
>>>> might make sense to remove them already. First of all I am a bit afraid it
>>>> might take a long time before we arrive at the 2.0 version. We have not
>>>> ever discussed that in the community. At the same time a lot of the methods
>>>> already don't work or are buggy, and we do not fix them any more.
>>>>
>>>> Methods which removing would not break the Public guarantees:
>>>>
>>>> - ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)
>>>> - RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
>>>> - ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)
>>>> - 
>>>> StreamExecutionEnvironment#setNumberOfExecutionRetries/getNumberOfExecutionRetries
>>>> (not the equivalent in the ExecutionConfig)
>>>> - StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend)
>>>> (deprecated in 1.5)
>>>>
>>>> Methods which removing would break the Public guarantees:
>>>>
>>>> which have no effect:
>>>>
>>>> - ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
>>>> - ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)
>>>>
>>>> which are buggy or discouraged and thus we do not support fixing them:
>>>>
>>>> - DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
>>>> - DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as
>>>> FoldFunction, FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in
>>>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-28 Thread Yun Tang
I noticed that the ticket to remove deprecated DataStream#fold() [1] has been 
created but not yet reach an agreement or assigned.

Actually fold related function and state descriptions has been deprecated for 
long than 3 years, and I think it's okay to remove such kind of state now.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19035

Best,
Yun Tang

From: Aljoscha Krettek 
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 16:45
To: dev@flink.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

Did you consider DataStream.project() yet? In general I think we should
remove most of the relational-ish methods from DataStream. More
candidates in this set of methods would be the tuple index/expression
methods for aggregations like min/max etc...

Aljoscha

On 25.08.20 20:52, Konstantin Knauf wrote:
> I would argue that the guarantees of @Public methods that became
> ineffective were broken when they became ineffective (and were deprecated).
>
> - ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
> - ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)
>
> Removing these methods seems like the better of two evils to me as it shows
> users that they have been using no-ops for some time.
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 10:50 AM Stephan Ewen  wrote:
>
>> We have removed some public methods in the past, after a careful
>> deprecation period, if they were not well working any more.
>>
>> The sentiment I got from users is that careful cleanup is in fact
>> appreciated, otherwise things get confusing over time (the deprecated
>> methods cause noise in the API).
>> Still, we need to be very careful here.
>>
>> I would suggest to
>>- start with the non-public breaking methods
>>- remove fold() (very long deprecated)
>>- remove split() buggy
>>
>> Removing the env.socketStream() and env.fileStream() methods would
>> probably be good, too. They are very long deprecated and they don't work
>> well (with checkpoints) and the sources are the first thing a user needs to
>> understand when starting with Flink, so removing noise there is super
>> helpful.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:53 AM Dawid Wysakowicz 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Till,
>>>
>>> You've got a good point here. Removing some of the methods would cause
>>> breaking the stability guarantees. I do understand if we decide not to
>>> remove them for that reason, let me explain though why I am thinking it
>>> might make sense to remove them already. First of all I am a bit afraid it
>>> might take a long time before we arrive at the 2.0 version. We have not
>>> ever discussed that in the community. At the same time a lot of the methods
>>> already don't work or are buggy, and we do not fix them any more.
>>>
>>> Methods which removing would not break the Public guarantees:
>>>
>>> - ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)
>>> - RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
>>> - ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)
>>> - 
>>> StreamExecutionEnvironment#setNumberOfExecutionRetries/getNumberOfExecutionRetries
>>> (not the equivalent in the ExecutionConfig)
>>> - StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend)
>>> (deprecated in 1.5)
>>>
>>> Methods which removing would break the Public guarantees:
>>>
>>> which have no effect:
>>>
>>> - ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
>>> - ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)
>>>
>>> which are buggy or discouraged and thus we do not support fixing them:
>>>
>>> - DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
>>> - DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as
>>> FoldFunction, FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in
>>> 1.3/1.4)
>>>
>>> The methods like:
>>>
>>> - 
>>> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...),
>>>
>>> - methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either
>>> indices or field names
>>> -
>>> ExecutionConfig#setNumberOfExecutionRetries/getNumberOfExecutionRetries
>>>
>>> should be working just fine and I feel the least eager to remove those.
>>>
>>> I'd suggest I will open PRs for removing the methods that will not cause

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-28 Thread Dawid Wysakowicz
;
>>>>     - ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)
>>>>     - RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
>>>>     - ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)
>>>>     -
>>>> StreamExecutionEnvironment#setNumberOfExecutionRetries/getNumberOfExecutionRetries
>>>>     (not the equivalent in the ExecutionConfig)
>>>>     - StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend)
>>>>     (deprecated in 1.5)
>>>>
>>>> Methods which removing would break the Public guarantees:
>>>>
>>>> which have no effect:
>>>>
>>>>     - ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
>>>>     - ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated
>>>> in 1.9)
>>>>
>>>> which are buggy or discouraged and thus we do not support fixing them:
>>>>
>>>>     - DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
>>>>     - DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as
>>>>     FoldFunction, FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ...
>>>> (deprecated in
>>>>     1.3/1.4)
>>>>
>>>> The methods like:
>>>>
>>>>     -
>>>> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...),
>>>>
>>>>     - methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either
>>>>     indices or field names
>>>>     -
>>>>    
>>>> ExecutionConfig#setNumberOfExecutionRetries/getNumberOfExecutionRetries
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> should be working just fine and I feel the least eager to remove
>>>> those.
>>>>
>>>> I'd suggest I will open PRs for removing the methods that will not
>>>> cause
>>>> breakage of the Public guarantees as the general feedback was rather
>>>> positive. For the rest I do understand the resentment to do so and
>>>> will not
>>>> do it in the 1.x branch. Still I think it is valuable to have the
>>>> discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Dawid
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 18/08/2020 09:26, Till Rohrmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Having looked at the proposed set of methods to remove I've noticed
>>>> that
>>>> some of them are actually annotated with @Public. According to our
>>>> stability guarantees, only major releases (1.0, 2.0, etc.) can
>>>> break APIs
>>>> with this annotation. Hence, I believe that we cannot simply remove
>>>> them
>>>> unless the community decides to change the stability guarantees we
>>>> give or
>>>> by making the next release a major release (Flink 2.0).
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 5:57 AM Yun Gao  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 for removing the methods that are deprecated for a while & have
>>>>> alternative methods.
>>>>>
>>>>> One specific thing is that if we remove the DataStream#split, do we
>>>>> consider enabling side-output in more operators in the future ?
>>>>> Currently
>>>>> it should be only available in ProcessFunctions, but not available
>>>>> to other
>>>>> commonly used UDF like Source or AsyncFunction[1].
>>>>>
>>>>> One temporary solution occurs to me is to add a ProcessFunction after
>>>>> the operators want to use side-output. But I think the solution is
>>>>> not very
>>>>> direct to come up with and if it really works we might add it to the
>>>>> document of side-output.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7954
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>   Yun
>>>>>
>>>>> --Original Mail --
>>>>> *Sender:*Kostas Kloudas 
>>>>> *Send Date:*Tue Aug 18 03:52:44 2020
>>>>> *Recipients:*Dawid Wysakowicz 
>>>>> *CC:*dev , user 
>>>>> *Subject:*Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from
>>>>> DataStream API
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for removing them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>&g

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-27 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
rowse/FLINK-7954

Best,
  Yun

--Original Mail --
*Sender:*Kostas Kloudas 
*Send Date:*Tue Aug 18 03:52:44 2020
*Recipients:*Dawid Wysakowicz 
*CC:*dev , user 
*Subject:*Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API


+1 for removing them.



 From a quick look, most of them (not all) have been deprecated a long
time ago.



Cheers,

Kostas



On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:37 PM Dawid Wysakowicz wrote:






@David Yes, my idea was to remove any use of fold method and all

related classes including WindowedStream#fold






@Klou Good idea to also remove the deprecated enableCheckpointing() &

StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile and alike. I did another pass over some
of the classes and thought we could also drop:






ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode



ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging



ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError



ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled







As for the `forceCheckpointing` I am not fully convinced to doing it.

As far as I know iterations still do not participate in checkpointing
correctly. Therefore it still might make sense to force it. In other words
there is no real alternative to that method. Unless we only remove the
methods from StreamExecutionEnvironment and redirect to the setter in
CheckpointConfig. WDYT?






An updated list of methods I suggest to remove:







ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)



ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)



ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)



ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)



ExecutionConfig#(get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() (deprecated in

1.1?)




StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...)
(deprecated in 1.2)


RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)



DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as

FoldFunction, FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in
1.3/1.4)


StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend)

(deprecated in 1.5)


DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)



Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices

or field names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom,
ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)






Bear in mind that majority of the options listed above in

ExecutionConfig take no effect. They were left there purely to satisfy the
binary compatibility. Personally I don't see any benefit of leaving a
method and silently dropping the underlying feature. The only configuration
that is respected is setting the number of execution retries.






I also wanted to make it explicit that most of the changes above

would result in a binary incompatibility and require additional exclusions
in the japicmp. Those are:






ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)



ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)



ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)



ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)



ExecutionConfig#(get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() (deprecated in

1.1?)


DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as

FoldFunction, FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in
1.3/1.4)


DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)



Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices

or field names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom,
ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)




StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...)
(deprecated in 1.2)






Looking forward to more opinions on the issue.







Best,







Dawid











On 17/08/2020 12:49, Kostas Kloudas wrote:







Thanks a lot for starting this Dawid,







Big +1 for the proposed clean-up, and I would also add the deprecated



methods of the StreamExecutionEnvironment like:







enableCheckpointing(long interval, CheckpointingMode mode, boolean

force)


enableCheckpointing()



isForceCheckpointing()







readFile(FileInputFormat inputFormat,String



filePath,FileProcessingMode watchType,long interval, FilePathFilter



filter)



readFileStream(...)







socketTextStream(String hostname, int port, char delimiter, long

maxRetry)


socketTextStream(String hostname, int port, char delimiter)







There are more, like the (get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() that were



deprecated long ago, but I have not investigated to see if they are



actually easy to remove.







Cheers,



Kostas







On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:53 AM Dawid Wysakowicz



wrote:







Hi devs and users,







I wanted to ask you what do you think about removing some of the

deprecated APIs around the DataStream API.






The APIs I have in mind are:







RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecat

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-25 Thread Konstantin Knauf
bling side-output in more operators in the future ? Currently
>>> it should be only available in ProcessFunctions, but not available to other
>>> commonly used UDF like Source or AsyncFunction[1].
>>>
>>> One temporary solution occurs to me is to add a ProcessFunction after
>>> the operators want to use side-output. But I think the solution is not very
>>> direct to come up with and if it really works we might add it to the
>>> document of side-output.
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7954
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>  Yun
>>>
>>> --Original Mail --
>>> *Sender:*Kostas Kloudas 
>>> *Send Date:*Tue Aug 18 03:52:44 2020
>>> *Recipients:*Dawid Wysakowicz 
>>> *CC:*dev , user 
>>> *Subject:*Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API
>>>
>>>> +1 for removing them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From a quick look, most of them (not all) have been deprecated a long
>>>> time ago.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Kostas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:37 PM Dawid Wysakowicz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > @David Yes, my idea was to remove any use of fold method and all
>>>> related classes including WindowedStream#fold
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > @Klou Good idea to also remove the deprecated enableCheckpointing() &
>>>> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile and alike. I did another pass over some
>>>> of the classes and thought we could also drop:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode
>>>>
>>>> > ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging
>>>>
>>>> > ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError
>>>>
>>>> > ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > As for the `forceCheckpointing` I am not fully convinced to doing it.
>>>> As far as I know iterations still do not participate in checkpointing
>>>> correctly. Therefore it still might make sense to force it. In other words
>>>> there is no real alternative to that method. Unless we only remove the
>>>> methods from StreamExecutionEnvironment and redirect to the setter in
>>>> CheckpointConfig. WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > An updated list of methods I suggest to remove:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)
>>>>
>>>> > ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
>>>>
>>>> > ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)
>>>>
>>>> > ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)
>>>>
>>>> > ExecutionConfig#(get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() (deprecated in
>>>> 1.1?)
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...)
>>>> (deprecated in 1.2)
>>>>
>>>> > RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
>>>>
>>>> > DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as
>>>> FoldFunction, FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in
>>>> 1.3/1.4)
>>>>
>>>> > StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend)
>>>> (deprecated in 1.5)
>>>>
>>>> > DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
>>>>
>>>> > Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices
>>>> or field names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom,
>>>> ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > Bear in mind that majority of the options listed above in
>>>> ExecutionConfig take no effect. They were left there purely to satisfy the
>>>> binary compatibility. Personally I don't see any benefit of leaving a
>>>> method and silently dropping the underlying feature. The only configuration
>>>> that is respected is setting the

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-20 Thread Stephan Ewen
We have removed some public methods in the past, after a careful
deprecation period, if they were not well working any more.

The sentiment I got from users is that careful cleanup is in fact
appreciated, otherwise things get confusing over time (the deprecated
methods cause noise in the API).
Still, we need to be very careful here.

I would suggest to
  - start with the non-public breaking methods
  - remove fold() (very long deprecated)
  - remove split() buggy

Removing the env.socketStream() and env.fileStream() methods would probably
be good, too. They are very long deprecated and they don't work well (with
checkpoints) and the sources are the first thing a user needs to understand
when starting with Flink, so removing noise there is super helpful.


On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:53 AM Dawid Wysakowicz 
wrote:

> Hey Till,
>
> You've got a good point here. Removing some of the methods would cause
> breaking the stability guarantees. I do understand if we decide not to
> remove them for that reason, let me explain though why I am thinking it
> might make sense to remove them already. First of all I am a bit afraid it
> might take a long time before we arrive at the 2.0 version. We have not
> ever discussed that in the community. At the same time a lot of the methods
> already don't work or are buggy, and we do not fix them any more.
>
> Methods which removing would not break the Public guarantees:
>
>- ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)
>- RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
>- ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)
>- 
> StreamExecutionEnvironment#setNumberOfExecutionRetries/getNumberOfExecutionRetries
>(not the equivalent in the ExecutionConfig)
>- StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend)
>(deprecated in 1.5)
>
> Methods which removing would break the Public guarantees:
>
> which have no effect:
>
>- ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
>- ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)
>
> which are buggy or discouraged and thus we do not support fixing them:
>
>- DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
>- DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as
>FoldFunction, FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in
>1.3/1.4)
>
> The methods like:
>
>- 
> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...),
>
>- methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices
>or field names
>-
>ExecutionConfig#setNumberOfExecutionRetries/getNumberOfExecutionRetries
>
> should be working just fine and I feel the least eager to remove those.
>
> I'd suggest I will open PRs for removing the methods that will not cause
> breakage of the Public guarantees as the general feedback was rather
> positive. For the rest I do understand the resentment to do so and will not
> do it in the 1.x branch. Still I think it is valuable to have the
> discussion.
>
> Best,
>
> Dawid
>
>
> On 18/08/2020 09:26, Till Rohrmann wrote:
>
> Having looked at the proposed set of methods to remove I've noticed that
> some of them are actually annotated with @Public. According to our
> stability guarantees, only major releases (1.0, 2.0, etc.) can break APIs
> with this annotation. Hence, I believe that we cannot simply remove them
> unless the community decides to change the stability guarantees we give or
> by making the next release a major release (Flink 2.0).
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 5:57 AM Yun Gao  wrote:
>
>> +1 for removing the methods that are deprecated for a while & have
>> alternative methods.
>>
>> One specific thing is that if we remove the DataStream#split, do we
>> consider enabling side-output in more operators in the future ? Currently
>> it should be only available in ProcessFunctions, but not available to other
>> commonly used UDF like Source or AsyncFunction[1].
>>
>> One temporary solution occurs to me is to add a ProcessFunction after the
>> operators want to use side-output. But I think the solution is not very
>> direct to come up with and if it really works we might add it to the
>> document of side-output.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7954
>>
>> Best,
>>  Yun
>>
>> --Original Mail --
>> *Sender:*Kostas Kloudas 
>> *Send Date:*Tue Aug 18 03:52:44 2020
>> *Recipients:*Dawid Wysakowicz 
>> *CC:*dev , user 
>> *Subject:*Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from 

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-19 Thread Dawid Wysakowicz
Hey Till,

You've got a good point here. Removing some of the methods would cause
breaking the stability guarantees. I do understand if we decide not to
remove them for that reason, let me explain though why I am thinking it
might make sense to remove them already. First of all I am a bit afraid
it might take a long time before we arrive at the 2.0 version. We have
not ever discussed that in the community. At the same time a lot of the
methods already don't work or are buggy, and we do not fix them any more.

Methods which removing would not break the Public guarantees:

  * ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)
  * RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
  * ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)
  * 
StreamExecutionEnvironment#setNumberOfExecutionRetries/getNumberOfExecutionRetries
(not the equivalent in the ExecutionConfig)
  * StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend)
(deprecated in 1.5)

Methods which removing would break the Public guarantees:

which have no effect:

  * ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
  * ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)

which are buggy or discouraged and thus we do not support fixing them:

  * DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
  * DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as
FoldFunction, FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated
in 1.3/1.4)

The methods like:

  * 
StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...),

  * methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices
or field names
  * ExecutionConfig#setNumberOfExecutionRetries/getNumberOfExecutionRetries

should be working just fine and I feel the least eager to remove those.

I'd suggest I will open PRs for removing the methods that will not cause
breakage of the Public guarantees as the general feedback was rather
positive. For the rest I do understand the resentment to do so and will
not do it in the 1.x branch. Still I think it is valuable to have the
discussion.

Best,

Dawid


On 18/08/2020 09:26, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> Having looked at the proposed set of methods to remove I've noticed
> that some of them are actually annotated with @Public. According to
> our stability guarantees, only major releases (1.0, 2.0, etc.) can
> break APIs with this annotation. Hence, I believe that we cannot
> simply remove them unless the community decides to change the
> stability guarantees we give or by making the next release a major
> release (Flink 2.0).
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 5:57 AM Yun Gao  <mailto:yungao...@aliyun.com>> wrote:
>
> +1 for removing the methods that are deprecated for a while & have
> alternative methods.
>
> One specific thing is that if we remove the DataStream#split, do
> we consider enabling side-output in more operators in the future ?
> Currently it should be only available in ProcessFunctions, but not
> available to other commonly used UDF like Source or AsyncFunction[1].
>
> One temporary solution occurs to me is to add a ProcessFunction
> after the operators want to use side-output. But I think the
> solution is not very direct to come up with and if it really works
> we might add it to the document of side-output. 
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7954
>
> Best,
>  Yun
>
> --Original Mail --
> *Sender:*Kostas Kloudas  <mailto:kklou...@gmail.com>>
> *Send Date:*Tue Aug 18 03:52:44 2020
> *Recipients:*Dawid Wysakowicz  <mailto:dwysakow...@apache.org>>
>     *CC:*dev mailto:dev@flink.apache.org>>,
> user mailto:u...@flink.apache.org>>
> *Subject:*Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from
> DataStream API
>
> +1 for removing them.
>
>
>
> From a quick look, most of them (not all) have been
> deprecated a long time ago.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kostas
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:37 PM Dawid Wysakowicz wrote:
>
> >
>
> > @David Yes, my idea was to remove any use of fold method
> and all related classes including WindowedStream#fold
>
> >
>
> > @Klou Good idea to also remove the deprecated
> enableCheckpointing() &
> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile and alike. I did
> another pass over some of the classes and thought we could
> also drop:
>
> >
>
>   

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-18 Thread Till Rohrmann
Having looked at the proposed set of methods to remove I've noticed that
some of them are actually annotated with @Public. According to our
stability guarantees, only major releases (1.0, 2.0, etc.) can break APIs
with this annotation. Hence, I believe that we cannot simply remove them
unless the community decides to change the stability guarantees we give or
by making the next release a major release (Flink 2.0).

Cheers,
Till

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 5:57 AM Yun Gao  wrote:

> +1 for removing the methods that are deprecated for a while & have
> alternative methods.
>
> One specific thing is that if we remove the DataStream#split, do we
> consider enabling side-output in more operators in the future ? Currently
> it should be only available in ProcessFunctions, but not available to other
> commonly used UDF like Source or AsyncFunction[1].
>
> One temporary solution occurs to me is to add a ProcessFunction after the
> operators want to use side-output. But I think the solution is not very
> direct to come up with and if it really works we might add it to the
> document of side-output.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7954
>
> Best,
>  Yun
>
> --Original Mail --
> *Sender:*Kostas Kloudas 
> *Send Date:*Tue Aug 18 03:52:44 2020
> *Recipients:*Dawid Wysakowicz 
> *CC:*dev , user 
> *Subject:*Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API
>
>> +1 for removing them.
>>
>>
>>
>> From a quick look, most of them (not all) have been deprecated a long
>> time ago.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Kostas
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:37 PM Dawid Wysakowicz wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
>> > @David Yes, my idea was to remove any use of fold method and all
>> related classes including WindowedStream#fold
>>
>> >
>>
>> > @Klou Good idea to also remove the deprecated enableCheckpointing() &
>> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile and alike. I did another pass over some
>> of the classes and thought we could also drop:
>>
>> >
>>
>> > ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode
>>
>> > ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging
>>
>> > ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError
>>
>> > ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled
>>
>> >
>>
>> > As for the `forceCheckpointing` I am not fully convinced to doing it.
>> As far as I know iterations still do not participate in checkpointing
>> correctly. Therefore it still might make sense to force it. In other words
>> there is no real alternative to that method. Unless we only remove the
>> methods from StreamExecutionEnvironment and redirect to the setter in
>> CheckpointConfig. WDYT?
>>
>> >
>>
>> > An updated list of methods I suggest to remove:
>>
>> >
>>
>> > ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)
>>
>> > ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
>>
>> > ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)
>>
>> > ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)
>>
>> > ExecutionConfig#(get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() (deprecated in 1.1?)
>>
>> >
>> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...)
>> (deprecated in 1.2)
>>
>> > RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
>>
>> > DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as
>> FoldFunction, FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in
>> 1.3/1.4)
>>
>> > StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend)
>> (deprecated in 1.5)
>>
>> > DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
>>
>> > Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices or
>> field names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom,
>> ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Bear in mind that majority of the options listed above in
>> ExecutionConfig take no effect. They were left there purely to satisfy the
>> binary compatibility. Personally I don't see any benefit of leaving a
>> method and silently dropping the underlying feature. The only configuration
>> that is respected is setting the number of execution retries.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > I also wanted to make it explicit that most of the changes above would
>> result in a binary incompatibility and require 

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-17 Thread Yun Gao
+1 for removing the methods that are deprecated for a while & have alternative 
methods.

One specific thing is that if we remove the DataStream#split, do we consider 
enabling side-output in more operators in the future ? Currently it should be 
only available in ProcessFunctions, but not available to other commonly used 
UDF like Source or AsyncFunction[1].

One temporary solution occurs to me is to add a ProcessFunction after the 
operators want to use side-output. But I think the solution is not very direct 
to come up with and if it really works we might add it to the document of 
side-output. 

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7954

Best,
 Yun


 --Original Mail --
Sender:Kostas Kloudas 
Send Date:Tue Aug 18 03:52:44 2020
Recipients:Dawid Wysakowicz 
CC:dev , user 
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API
+1 for removing them.



From a quick look, most of them (not all) have been deprecated a long time ago.



Cheers,

Kostas



On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:37 PM Dawid Wysakowicz  wrote:

>

> @David Yes, my idea was to remove any use of fold method and all related 
> classes including WindowedStream#fold

>

> @Klou Good idea to also remove the deprecated enableCheckpointing() & 
> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile and alike. I did another pass over some 
> of the classes and thought we could also drop:

>

> ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode

> ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging

> ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError

> ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled

>

> As for the `forceCheckpointing` I am not fully convinced to doing it. As far 
> as I know iterations still do not participate in checkpointing correctly. 
> Therefore it still might make sense to force it. In other words there is no 
> real alternative to that method. Unless we only remove the methods from 
> StreamExecutionEnvironment and redirect to the setter in CheckpointConfig. 
> WDYT?

>

> An updated list of methods I suggest to remove:

>

> ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)

> ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)

> ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)

> ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)

> ExecutionConfig#(get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() (deprecated in 1.1?)

> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...)
>  (deprecated in 1.2)

> RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)

> DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as FoldFunction, 
> FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in 1.3/1.4)

> StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend) (deprecated 
> in 1.5)

> DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)

> Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices or field 
> names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom, 
> ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)

>

> Bear in mind that majority of the options listed above in ExecutionConfig 
> take no effect. They were left there purely to satisfy the binary 
> compatibility. Personally I don't see any benefit of leaving a method and 
> silently dropping the underlying feature. The only configuration that is 
> respected is setting the number of execution retries.

>

> I also wanted to make it explicit that most of the changes above would result 
> in a binary incompatibility and require additional exclusions in the japicmp. 
> Those are:

>

> ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)

> ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)

> ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)

> ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)

> ExecutionConfig#(get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() (deprecated in 1.1?)

> DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as FoldFunction, 
> FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in 1.3/1.4)

> DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)

> Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices or field 
> names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom, 
> ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)

> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...)
>  (deprecated in 1.2)

>

> Looking forward to more opinions on the issue.

>

> Best,

>

> Dawid

>

>

> On 17/08/2020 12:49, Kostas Kloudas wrote:

>

> Thanks a lot for starting this Dawid,

>

> Big +1 for the proposed clean-up, and I would also add the deprecated

> methods of the StreamExecutionEnvironment like:

>

> enableCheckpointing(long interval, CheckpointingMode mode, boolean force)

> enableCheckpointing()

> isForceCheckpointing()

>

> readFile(FileInputFormat inputFormat,String

> filePath,FileProcessingMode watchType,long interval, FilePathFilter

> fi

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-17 Thread Kostas Kloudas
+1 for removing them.

>From a quick look, most of them (not all) have been deprecated a long time ago.

Cheers,
Kostas

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:37 PM Dawid Wysakowicz  wrote:
>
> @David Yes, my idea was to remove any use of fold method and all related 
> classes including WindowedStream#fold
>
> @Klou Good idea to also remove the deprecated enableCheckpointing() & 
> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile and alike. I did another pass over some 
> of the classes and thought we could also drop:
>
> ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode
> ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging
> ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError
> ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled
>
> As for the `forceCheckpointing` I am not fully convinced to doing it. As far 
> as I know iterations still do not participate in checkpointing correctly. 
> Therefore it still might make sense to force it. In other words there is no 
> real alternative to that method. Unless we only remove the methods from 
> StreamExecutionEnvironment and redirect to the setter in CheckpointConfig. 
> WDYT?
>
> An updated list of methods I suggest to remove:
>
> ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)
> ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
> ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)
> ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)
> ExecutionConfig#(get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() (deprecated in 1.1?)
> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...)
>  (deprecated in 1.2)
> RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
> DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as FoldFunction, 
> FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in 1.3/1.4)
> StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend) (deprecated 
> in 1.5)
> DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
> Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices or field 
> names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom, 
> ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)
>
> Bear in mind that majority of the options listed above in ExecutionConfig 
> take no effect. They were left there purely to satisfy the binary 
> compatibility. Personally I don't see any benefit of leaving a method and 
> silently dropping the underlying feature. The only configuration that is 
> respected is setting the number of execution retries.
>
> I also wanted to make it explicit that most of the changes above would result 
> in a binary incompatibility and require additional exclusions in the japicmp. 
> Those are:
>
> ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)
> ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
> ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)
> ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)
> ExecutionConfig#(get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() (deprecated in 1.1?)
> DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as FoldFunction, 
> FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in 1.3/1.4)
> DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
> Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices or field 
> names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom, 
> ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)
> StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...)
>  (deprecated in 1.2)
>
> Looking forward to more opinions on the issue.
>
> Best,
>
> Dawid
>
>
> On 17/08/2020 12:49, Kostas Kloudas wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for starting this Dawid,
>
> Big +1 for the proposed clean-up, and I would also add the deprecated
> methods of the StreamExecutionEnvironment like:
>
> enableCheckpointing(long interval, CheckpointingMode mode, boolean force)
> enableCheckpointing()
> isForceCheckpointing()
>
> readFile(FileInputFormat inputFormat,String
> filePath,FileProcessingMode watchType,long interval, FilePathFilter
> filter)
> readFileStream(...)
>
> socketTextStream(String hostname, int port, char delimiter, long maxRetry)
> socketTextStream(String hostname, int port, char delimiter)
>
> There are more, like the (get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() that were
> deprecated long ago, but I have not investigated to see if they are
> actually easy to remove.
>
> Cheers,
> Kostas
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:53 AM Dawid Wysakowicz
>  wrote:
>
> Hi devs and users,
>
> I wanted to ask you what do you think about removing some of the deprecated 
> APIs around the DataStream API.
>
> The APIs I have in mind are:
>
> RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
> DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as FoldFunction, 
> FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in 1.3/1.4)
> StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend) (deprecated 
> in 1.5)
> DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
> Methods in (Connected)DataStream th

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-17 Thread Dawid Wysakowicz
@David Yes, my idea was to remove any use of fold method and all related
classes including WindowedStream#fold

@Klou Good idea to also remove the deprecated enableCheckpointing() &
StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile and alike. I did another pass over
some of the classes and thought we could also drop:

  * ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode
  * ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging
  * ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError
  * ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled

As for the `forceCheckpointing` I am not fully convinced to doing it. As
far as I know iterations still do not participate in checkpointing
correctly. Therefore it still might make sense to force it. In other
words there is no real alternative to that method. Unless we only remove
the methods from StreamExecutionEnvironment and redirect to the setter
in CheckpointConfig. WDYT?

An updated list of methods I suggest to remove:

  * ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)
  * ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
  * ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)
  * ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)
  * ExecutionConfig#(get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() (deprecated in 1.1?)
  * 
StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...)
(deprecated in 1.2)
  * RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
  * DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as
FoldFunction, FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated
in 1.3/1.4)
  * StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend)
(deprecated in 1.5)
  * DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
  * Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices
or field names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom,
ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)

Bear in mind that majority of the options listed above in
ExecutionConfig take no effect. They were left there purely to satisfy
the binary compatibility. Personally I don't see any benefit of leaving
a method and silently dropping the underlying feature. The only
configuration that is respected is setting the number of execution retries.

I also wanted to make it explicit that most of the changes above would
result in a binary incompatibility and require additional exclusions in
the japicmp. Those are:

  * ExecutionConfig#set/getCodeAnalysisMode (deprecated in 1.9)
  * ExecutionConfig#disable/enableSysoutLogging (deprecated in 1.10)
  * ExecutionConfig#set/isFailTaskOnCheckpointError (deprecated in 1.9)
  * ExecutionConfig#isLatencyTrackingEnabled (deprecated in 1.7)
  * ExecutionConfig#(get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() (deprecated in 1.1?)
  * DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as
FoldFunction, FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated
in 1.3/1.4)
  * DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
  * Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices
or field names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom,
ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)
  * 
StreamExecutionEnvironment#readFile,readFileStream(...),socketTextStream(...),socketTextStream(...)
(deprecated in 1.2)

Looking forward to more opinions on the issue.

Best,

Dawid


On 17/08/2020 12:49, Kostas Kloudas wrote:
> Thanks a lot for starting this Dawid,
>
> Big +1 for the proposed clean-up, and I would also add the deprecated
> methods of the StreamExecutionEnvironment like:
>
> enableCheckpointing(long interval, CheckpointingMode mode, boolean force)
> enableCheckpointing()
> isForceCheckpointing()
>
> readFile(FileInputFormat inputFormat,String
> filePath,FileProcessingMode watchType,long interval, FilePathFilter
> filter)
> readFileStream(...)
>
> socketTextStream(String hostname, int port, char delimiter, long maxRetry)
> socketTextStream(String hostname, int port, char delimiter)
>
> There are more, like the (get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() that were
> deprecated long ago, but I have not investigated to see if they are
> actually easy to remove.
>
> Cheers,
> Kostas
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:53 AM Dawid Wysakowicz
>  wrote:
>> Hi devs and users,
>>
>> I wanted to ask you what do you think about removing some of the deprecated 
>> APIs around the DataStream API.
>>
>> The APIs I have in mind are:
>>
>> RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
>> DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as FoldFunction, 
>> FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in 1.3/1.4)
>> StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend) (deprecated 
>> in 1.5)
>> DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
>> Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices or 
>> field names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom, 
>> ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)
>>
>> I think the 

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-17 Thread David Anderson
I assume that along with DataStream#fold you would also
remove WindowedStream#fold.

I'm in favor of going ahead with all of these.

David

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:53 AM Dawid Wysakowicz 
wrote:

> Hi devs and users,
>
> I wanted to ask you what do you think about removing some of the
> deprecated APIs around the DataStream API.
>
> The APIs I have in mind are:
>
>- RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
>- DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as
>FoldFunction, FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in
>1.3/1.4)
>- StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend)
>(deprecated in 1.5)
>- DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
>- Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices
>or field names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom,
>ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)
>
> I think the first three should be straightforward. They are long
> deprecated. The getAccumulators method is not used very often in my
> opinion. The same applies to the DataStream#fold which additionally is not
> very performant. Lastly the setStateBackend has an alternative with a class
> from the AbstractStateBackend hierarchy, therefore it will be still code
> compatible. Moreover if we remove the
> #setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend) we will get rid off warnings users
> have right now when setting a statebackend as the correct method cannot be
> used without an explicit casting.
>
> As for the DataStream#split I know there were some objections against
> removing the #split method in the past. I still believe the output tags can
> replace the split method already.
>
> The only problem in the last set of methods I propose to remove is that
> they were deprecated only in the last release and those method were only
> partially deprecated. Moreover some of the methods were not deprecated in
> ConnectedStreams. Nevertheless I'd still be inclined to remove the methods
> in this release.
>
> Let me know what do you think about it.
>
> Best,
>
> Dawid
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Removing deprecated methods from DataStream API

2020-08-17 Thread Kostas Kloudas
Thanks a lot for starting this Dawid,

Big +1 for the proposed clean-up, and I would also add the deprecated
methods of the StreamExecutionEnvironment like:

enableCheckpointing(long interval, CheckpointingMode mode, boolean force)
enableCheckpointing()
isForceCheckpointing()

readFile(FileInputFormat inputFormat,String
filePath,FileProcessingMode watchType,long interval, FilePathFilter
filter)
readFileStream(...)

socketTextStream(String hostname, int port, char delimiter, long maxRetry)
socketTextStream(String hostname, int port, char delimiter)

There are more, like the (get)/setNumberOfExecutionRetries() that were
deprecated long ago, but I have not investigated to see if they are
actually easy to remove.

Cheers,
Kostas

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:53 AM Dawid Wysakowicz
 wrote:
>
> Hi devs and users,
>
> I wanted to ask you what do you think about removing some of the deprecated 
> APIs around the DataStream API.
>
> The APIs I have in mind are:
>
> RuntimeContext#getAllAccumulators (deprecated in 0.10)
> DataStream#fold and all related classes and methods such as FoldFunction, 
> FoldingState, FoldingStateDescriptor ... (deprecated in 1.3/1.4)
> StreamExecutionEnvironment#setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend) (deprecated 
> in 1.5)
> DataStream#split (deprecated in 1.8)
> Methods in (Connected)DataStream that specify keys as either indices or field 
> names such as DataStream#keyBy, DataStream#partitionCustom, 
> ConnectedStream#keyBy,  (deprecated in 1.11)
>
> I think the first three should be straightforward. They are long deprecated. 
> The getAccumulators method is not used very often in my opinion. The same 
> applies to the DataStream#fold which additionally is not very performant. 
> Lastly the setStateBackend has an alternative with a class from the 
> AbstractStateBackend hierarchy, therefore it will be still code compatible. 
> Moreover if we remove the #setStateBackend(AbstractStateBackend) we will get 
> rid off warnings users have right now when setting a statebackend as the 
> correct method cannot be used without an explicit casting.
>
> As for the DataStream#split I know there were some objections against 
> removing the #split method in the past. I still believe the output tags can 
> replace the split method already.
>
> The only problem in the last set of methods I propose to remove is that they 
> were deprecated only in the last release and those method were only partially 
> deprecated. Moreover some of the methods were not deprecated in 
> ConnectedStreams. Nevertheless I'd still be inclined to remove the methods in 
> this release.
>
> Let me know what do you think about it.
>
> Best,
>
> Dawid