[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Hi all, Thank you very much to everyone who spent time validating and voting on this release candidate! Here are the results: +1: Ashish Paliwal Mike Percy* Alexander Alten-Lorenz Jarek Jarcec Cecho* Arvind Prabhakar* Hari Shreedharan* 0: (None) -1: (None) * indicates a member of the Flume PMC Because this vote garnered majority approval with at least 3 PMC member +1 votes, this vote has passed, and RC1 will be released as Apache Flume 1.4.0. I will publish the artifacts to the release repositories and then send out an announcement email in the next day or two, after the mirrors have gotten some time to sync up with the origin server. Thanks, Mike
[CLOSED] [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
This vote is now closed. I will send out a result thread shortly. Thanks, Mike On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Mike Percy wrote: > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1. >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Sounds good, Mike, Arvind - thanks! I guess it really is BSD-licensed! My vote: +1 * Verified checksums, signatures * Full build, runs OK. * All top level files look good including the LICENSE file. Thanks, Hari On Saturday, June 29, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Mike Percy wrote: > Arvind, sounds reasonable to me. > > Hari, any concerns with this approach? > > Thanks, > Mike > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Arvind Prabhakar (mailto:arv...@apache.org)>wrote: > > > Given that there is ambiguity in terms of which license applies, and given > > that one of these licenses is Apache Software License 2.0, my suggestion is > > to keep BSD on record for our release. That way, we cover the more > > restrictive case and ideally should not pose any problems. > > > > Regards, > > Arvind Prabhakar > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Mike Percy > (mailto:mpe...@apache.org)> wrote: > > > > > Interesting find, Hari. These guys are really a licensing disaster. > > However > > > I believe Maven is wrong since the LICENSE file in their repository > > > contains this: > > > > > > > https://code.google.com/p/findbugs/source/browse/branches/1.3.9/findbugs/LICENSE-jsr305.txt > > > > > > -- > > > The JSR-305 reference implementation (lib/jsr305.jar) is > > > distributed under the terms of the New BSD license: > > > > > > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php > > > > > > See the JSR-305 home page for more information: > > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/jsr-305/ -- So I think it really is BSD. > > > Thoughts? Thanks, Mike > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Hari Shreedharan < > > > hshreedha...@cloudera.com (mailto:hshreedha...@cloudera.com) > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Looks like jsr305 is actually ASL2.0 (according to the mvn central pom > > > for > > > > the specific version: > > > > > > > > > > http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Ccom.google.code.findbugs%7Cjsr305%7C1.3.9%7Cjar > > > ). > > > > The pom installed locally also has this: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Apache Software License, Version > > > > 2.0 > > > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt > > > > repo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The webpage on the other hand says it is BSD licensed. Maybe we should > > > > verify this? I know the last few of our releases went out with BSD in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > Licenses file. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hari > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > * Checked license file > > > > > * Run tests > > > > > * Checked other top level files > > > > > * Checked checksums and signature > > > > > > > > > > Jarcec > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:30:18PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote: > > > > > > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, > > > > > > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1. > > > > > > > > > > > > It fixes the following issues: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > > > > > > > > > > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > > > > > > > > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, > > > > *.sha1) > > > > > > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Maven staging repo: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/ > > > > > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted on: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > > > > > > > > > > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is > > > > here: > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Arvind, sounds reasonable to me. Hari, any concerns with this approach? Thanks, Mike On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > Given that there is ambiguity in terms of which license applies, and given > that one of these licenses is Apache Software License 2.0, my suggestion is > to keep BSD on record for our release. That way, we cover the more > restrictive case and ideally should not pose any problems. > > Regards, > Arvind Prabhakar > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Mike Percy wrote: > > > Interesting find, Hari. These guys are really a licensing disaster. > However > > I believe Maven is wrong since the LICENSE file in their repository > > contains this: > > > > > > > https://code.google.com/p/findbugs/source/browse/branches/1.3.9/findbugs/LICENSE-jsr305.txt > > > > -- > > The JSR-305 reference implementation (lib/jsr305.jar) is > > distributed under the terms of the New BSD license: > > > > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php > > > > See the JSR-305 home page for more information: > > > > http://code.google.com/p/jsr-305/ -- So I think it really is BSD. > > Thoughts? Thanks, Mike > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Hari Shreedharan < > > hshreedha...@cloudera.com > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Looks like jsr305 is actually ASL2.0 (according to the mvn central pom > > for > > > the specific version: > > > > > > http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Ccom.google.code.findbugs%7Cjsr305%7C1.3.9%7Cjar > > ). > > > The pom installed locally also has this: > > > > > > > > > The Apache Software License, Version > > > 2.0 > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt > > > repo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The webpage on the other hand says it is BSD licensed. Maybe we should > > > verify this? I know the last few of our releases went out with BSD in > the > > > Licenses file. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Hari > > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > * Checked license file > > > > * Run tests > > > > * Checked other top level files > > > > * Checked checksums and signature > > > > > > > > Jarcec > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:30:18PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote: > > > > > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, > > > > > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1. > > > > > > > > > > It fixes the following issues: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > > > > > > > > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > > > > > > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, > > > *.sha1) > > > > > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/ > > > > > > > > > > Maven staging repo: > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/ > > > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted on: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > > > > > > > > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is > > > here: > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
+1 * Built the sources * Verified checksums and signatures Thanks for the hard work Mike! Regards, Arvind Prabhakar On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Mike Percy wrote: > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1. > > It fixes the following issues: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1) > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/ > > Maven staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/ > > The tag to be voted on: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS > > Thanks, > Mike >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Given that there is ambiguity in terms of which license applies, and given that one of these licenses is Apache Software License 2.0, my suggestion is to keep BSD on record for our release. That way, we cover the more restrictive case and ideally should not pose any problems. Regards, Arvind Prabhakar On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Mike Percy wrote: > Interesting find, Hari. These guys are really a licensing disaster. However > I believe Maven is wrong since the LICENSE file in their repository > contains this: > > > https://code.google.com/p/findbugs/source/browse/branches/1.3.9/findbugs/LICENSE-jsr305.txt > > -- > The JSR-305 reference implementation (lib/jsr305.jar) is > distributed under the terms of the New BSD license: > > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php > > See the JSR-305 home page for more information: > > http://code.google.com/p/jsr-305/ -- So I think it really is BSD. > Thoughts? Thanks, Mike > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Hari Shreedharan < > hshreedha...@cloudera.com > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Looks like jsr305 is actually ASL2.0 (according to the mvn central pom > for > > the specific version: > > > http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Ccom.google.code.findbugs%7Cjsr305%7C1.3.9%7Cjar > ). > > The pom installed locally also has this: > > > > > > The Apache Software License, Version > > 2.0 > > > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt > > repo > > > > > > > > > > The webpage on the other hand says it is BSD licensed. Maybe we should > > verify this? I know the last few of our releases went out with BSD in the > > Licenses file. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Hari > > > > > > On Friday, June 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > * Checked license file > > > * Run tests > > > * Checked other top level files > > > * Checked checksums and signature > > > > > > Jarcec > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:30:18PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote: > > > > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, > > > > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1. > > > > > > > > It fixes the following issues: > > > > > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > > > > > > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > > > > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, > > *.sha1) > > > > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/ > > > > > > > > Maven staging repo: > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/ > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted on: > > > > > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > > > > > > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is > > here: > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Interesting find, Hari. These guys are really a licensing disaster. However I believe Maven is wrong since the LICENSE file in their repository contains this: https://code.google.com/p/findbugs/source/browse/branches/1.3.9/findbugs/LICENSE-jsr305.txt -- The JSR-305 reference implementation (lib/jsr305.jar) is distributed under the terms of the New BSD license: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php See the JSR-305 home page for more information: http://code.google.com/p/jsr-305/ -- So I think it really is BSD. Thoughts? Thanks, Mike On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Hari Shreedharan wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like jsr305 is actually ASL2.0 (according to the mvn central pom for > the specific version: > http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Ccom.google.code.findbugs%7Cjsr305%7C1.3.9%7Cjar). > The pom installed locally also has this: > > > The Apache Software License, Version > 2.0 > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt > repo > > > > > The webpage on the other hand says it is BSD licensed. Maybe we should > verify this? I know the last few of our releases went out with BSD in the > Licenses file. > > > Thanks, > Hari > > > On Friday, June 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > > > +1 > > > > * Checked license file > > * Run tests > > * Checked other top level files > > * Checked checksums and signature > > > > Jarcec > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:30:18PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote: > > > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, > > > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1. > > > > > > It fixes the following issues: > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > > > > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, > *.sha1) > > > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: > > > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/ > > > > > > Maven staging repo: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/ > > > > > > The tag to be voted on: > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > > > > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is > here: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Hi, Looks like jsr305 is actually ASL2.0 (according to the mvn central pom for the specific version: http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Ccom.google.code.findbugs%7Cjsr305%7C1.3.9%7Cjar). The pom installed locally also has this: The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt repo The webpage on the other hand says it is BSD licensed. Maybe we should verify this? I know the last few of our releases went out with BSD in the Licenses file. Thanks, Hari On Friday, June 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > +1 > > * Checked license file > * Run tests > * Checked other top level files > * Checked checksums and signature > > Jarcec > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:30:18PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote: > > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, > > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1. > > > > It fixes the following issues: > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1) > > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: > > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/ > > > > Maven staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/ > > > > The tag to be voted on: > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS > > > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
+1 * Checked license file * Run tests * Checked other top level files * Checked checksums and signature Jarcec On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:30:18PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote: > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1. > > It fixes the following issues: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1) > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/ > > Maven staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/ > > The tag to be voted on: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS > > Thanks, > Mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
+1 (non-binding) - build, test works - Windows related sources works Good work, Alex On Jun 25, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Mike Percy wrote: > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1. > > It fixes the following issues: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1) > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/ > > Maven staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/ > > The tag to be voted on: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS > > Thanks, > Mike -- Alexander Alten-Lorenz http://mapredit.blogspot.com German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
+1 - Verified sigs & checksums - Verified that all jars are accounted for in LICENSE file - RELEASE-NOTES / CHANGELOG look ok - Unit tests pass - Binary artifact runs with default config template file Mike On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Ashish wrote: > +1 > > verified checksum > build from source, working fine. > > RAT check doesn't like me and complains about .gitignore file. Maybe > someone can check it in clean environment. > I tried verifying the source tarball content with the git tag content, but > didn't had success with it. > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Mike Percy wrote: > > > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, > > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1. > > > > It fixes the following issues: > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1) > > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: > > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/ > > > > Maven staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/ > > > > The tag to be voted on: > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS > > > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > > > > -- > thanks > ashish > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
+1 verified checksum build from source, working fine. RAT check doesn't like me and complains about .gitignore file. Maybe someone can check it in clean environment. I tried verifying the source tarball content with the git tag content, but didn't had success with it. On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Mike Percy wrote: > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1. > > It fixes the following issues: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1) > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/ > > Maven staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/ > > The tag to be voted on: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS > > Thanks, > Mike > -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
[VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1. It fixes the following issues: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1) for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/ Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/ The tag to be voted on: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS Thanks, Mike
