Re: svn commit: r1061643 - in /forrest/site: docs_0_90/changes.html docs_0_90/changes.rss docs_0_90/changes.xml docs_0_90/skins.html docs_0_90/upgrading_09.html dtdx/document-v13.pdf dtdx/document-v20

2011-01-20 Thread Brian M Dube 
 -a href=#Changes+to+Build-N1034CChanges to Build/a
 +a href=#Changes+to+Build-N10355Changes to Build/a

 -a href=#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N10356Changes to the Code Base/a
 +a href=#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N1035FChanges to the Code Base/a

 -a href=#Changes+to+Documentation-N106D3Changes to Documentation/a
 +a href=#Changes+to+Documentation-N106DCChanges to Documentation/a

 -a href=#Contributors+to+this+release-N10875Contributors to this 
 release/a
 +a href=#Contributors+to+this+release-N1087EContributors to this 
 release/a

...

Perhaps a change similar to r1061144 should happen here. Also I think
there is discussion about '+' being invalid in these attributes. I'll
have to search for that discussion later.

-Brian

Re: svn commit: r1061643 - in /forrest/site: docs_0_90/changes.html docs_0_90/changes.rss docs_0_90/changes.xml docs_0_90/skins.html docs_0_90/upgrading_09.html dtdx/document-v13.pdf dtdx/document-v20

2011-01-20 Thread David Crossley 
Brian M Dube wrote:
  -a href=#Changes+to+Build-N1034CChanges to Build/a
  +a href=#Changes+to+Build-N10355Changes to Build/a
 
  -a href=#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N10356Changes to the Code Base/a
  +a href=#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N1035FChanges to the Code Base/a
 
  -a href=#Changes+to+Documentation-N106D3Changes to Documentation/a
  +a href=#Changes+to+Documentation-N106DCChanges to Documentation/a
 
  -a href=#Contributors+to+this+release-N10875Contributors to this 
  release/a
  +a href=#Contributors+to+this+release-N1087EContributors to this 
  release/a
 
 ...
 
 Perhaps a change similar to r1061144 should happen here.

I was wondering about that. This is in the projectInfo plugin.
Perhaps use the release version number instead.

 Also I think
 there is discussion about '+' being invalid in these attributes. I'll
 have to search for that discussion later.

Yes, that would be good.

-David