Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
+1 from me using MD5(apache-forrest-0.9.tar.gz)= ea58a078e3861d4dfc8bf3296a53a5f8 salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org codeBusters S.L. - web based systems consulting, training and solutions http://www.codebusters.es/
[Result] (Was: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote)
The vote period is finished. Tally of all votes: Five +1, no other votes Tally of votes from PMC members: Four +1 So the 0.9 release is affirmed. -David
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:47:08PM +1100, David Crossley wrote: For Windows get *.zip (md5sum c04600e8befeaf005d5e4b9d6c8034f9) For UNIX get *.tar.gz (md5sum ea58a078e3861d4dfc8bf3296a53a5f8) +1 md5sum$ ea58a078e3861d4dfc8bf3296a53a5f8 apache-forrest-0.9.tar.gz Thanks all. -Brian
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
+1 from me using MD5(apache-forrest-0.9.tar.gz)= ea58a078e3861d4dfc8bf3296a53a5f8 -David
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
Reminder: The vote has about 41 hours remaining. [2] end of vote on final release candidate and commence the upload phase Monday 2011-02-07 at 22:00 UTC (i.e. planned release date) http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=7month=2year=2011hour=22min=0sec=0p1=0 We are using release candidate rc1 -David David Crossley wrote: We need people to review the release candidate and to test it on your projects, especially on different operating systems and Java version. See testing hints below. Download the release candidate and supporting files: http://people.apache.org/~crossley/temp/forrest-09-rc1/ For Windows get *.zip (md5sum c04600e8befeaf005d5e4b9d6c8034f9) For UNIX get *.tar.gz (md5sum ea58a078e3861d4dfc8bf3296a53a5f8) Get the *.asc and *.md5 that match your chosen download. Java 1.5 or later is required. Testing and vote period concludes Monday 2011-02-07 at 22:00 UTC [2]. Anyone can test and vote, not just PMC members. However only the PMC votes are binding [3]. When voting, quote the md5sum to ensure that we are all using the correct final release candidate package. The votes need to happen against the final source release package. If we need to build another release candidate, due to necessary changes to the code or documentation [1], then we need to vote reagarding that package. PMC members need to satisfy themselves that the actual final release package meets the ASF principles. During this week we do need to hear about both successes and failures. Please report your operating system and Java versions and Jetty/Tomcat versions. So we have approximately 6 days. Here are some hints for actual testing: * Verify the release, especially if you are a committer. Follow: http://forrest.apache.org/mirrors.cgi#verify * Ensure that the compressed archive will unpack properly. * Follow the README.txt and index.html * Set $FORREST_HOME and $PATH appropriately. * Try it with different Java versions. * Try it with different versions of Apache Tomcat or Jetty. * Many known issues are already recorded at our Jira. * Don't worry too much about minor bugs. We are looking for blockers, such as it will not run. * Please add other discovered issues to Jira. * Make a fresh site ... cd my-new-dir forrest seed-sample forrest run ... use the local jetty server. forrest ... build the whole site from the command-line. forrest war ... use your own full Jetty or Tomcat. * Try it on the Forrest core docs ... cd site-author forrest run forrest * Forrest was already pre-built. Try building it again. cd main build clean build build test-sample * Try it on your own project, especially if you have a project sitemap and use some extra plugins. * If you are a user of forrestbot then try that. * Try building and installing the forrestbar. -- [1] create final release candidate if necessary Saturday 2011-02-05 at 22:00 UTC http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=5month=2year=2011hour=22min=0sec=0p1=0 [2] end of vote on final release candidate and commence the upload phase Monday 2011-02-07 at 22:00 UTC (i.e. planned release date) http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=7month=2year=2011hour=22min=0sec=0p1=0 [3] Guidelines for Voting A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. http://forrest.apache.org/guidelines.html#actions http://forrest.apache.org/guidelines.html#voting
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:10 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: As seen with http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1066728 and 1066729 we had made a tiny mistake with the trademark footer. IMO it would not cause another RC. +1 to ship it as is. --tim
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
David Crossley wrote:
Using our rc1 and Apache Tomcat 6.0.30 on Mac with Java 1.5
]$ cd seed-basic-rc1
]$ forrest war
]$ cp build/my-project.war $CATALINA_HOME/webapps
]$ $CATALINA_HOME/bin/startup.sh
Yes, it works.
However, i am having trouble with the war from
seed-sample and from site-author.
The seed-sample gives this in webapps/my-project/WEB-INF/logs/error.log
ERROR (2011-02-03) 22:03.00:895 [access] (/my-project/index.html)
http-8080-1/CocoonServlet: Internal Cocoon Problem
org.apache.cocoon.ProcessingException: Failed to process pipeline
at [TransformerException] -
file:///path/to/apache-tomcat-6.0.30/webapps/my-project/skins/pelt/xslt/html/site-to-xhtml.xsl:61:61
i.e. $FORREST_HOME/main/webapp/skins/pelt/xslt/html/site-to-xhtml.xsl
Does someone else also get that on Java 1.5
Any clues?
---
On a different Mac with Java 6:
The seed-sample war works okay. Hooray.
However, the site-author war does not work.
The reason is that it cannot find the project locationmap
and even if it did there would be no content.
It seems that the packing up of the WAR file does not like
the layout of our site-author space. In its forrest.properties
we configure project.content-dir=. and it seems that anything
using that property does not get packed into the war file,
e.g.
project.xdocs-dir=${project.content-dir}/content/xdocs
project.skinconf=${project.content-dir}/skinconf.xml
and content/locationmap.xml
... none of those get packed into the war file and so
are not available at runtime.
Moving that stuff into a sub-directory, and setting the
property project.content-dir does fix the problem.
-David
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
Brian M Dube wrote: Brian M Dube wrote: Launching Jetty is done differently in current versions. Our configuration file would also need to be redone. I'm working on this now. Getting the configuration tuned with a similar level of stability to the packaged 4.x version will take more time than I have for this. I'd like to integrate this upgrade along with other products right after release, unless someone else has time for this. Thanks for getting that far. I agree with that plan. -David
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:47 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: We need people to review the release candidate and to test it on your projects, especially on different operating systems and Java version. See testing hints below. It seems that we forgot to update our Jetty version and it's *really* old. It's not technically a blocker and we wouldn't recommend a production deployment using our embedded Jetty anyway, but it's embarrassingly old. I don't know what's involved in updating it but it shouldn't be that difficult. Anyway, I could go either way on this one. Another thing is that the site-author docs include ApacheCon NA 2010 in them. I'm thinking that might deserve a new rc? Based on: Tim-Williamss-MacBook-Pro:forrest-rc twilliams$ md5 apache-forrest-0.9.tar.gz java -version MD5 (apache-forrest-0.9.tar.gz) = ea58a078e3861d4dfc8bf3296a53a5f8 java version 1.6.0_20 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02-279-10M3065) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01-279, mixed mode) --tim
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
Would people please report their success and failures early. You can vote at any time, and even change your vote, or vote towards the end of the period, but at least please tell us something early about the state of things. If there are problems, then we need to fix them ASAP and build another release candidate. -David
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
Tim Williams wrote: Another thing is that the site-author docs include ApacheCon NA 2010 in them. I'm thinking that might deserve a new rc? That banner on the left-hand navigation is included by reference. So when the ASF Conferences people replace it with the next event, then it will show the new banner. -David
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:14 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: Tim Williams wrote: Another thing is that the site-author docs include ApacheCon NA 2010 in them. I'm thinking that might deserve a new rc? That banner on the left-hand navigation is included by reference. So when the ASF Conferences people replace it with the next event, then it will show the new banner. Shucks, thanks David I didn't even look - it used to be specific to an event. Thanks for clearing it up:) Do you have any thoughts on our such an old Jetty version? --tim
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
Using our rc1 and Apache Tomcat 6.0.30 on Mac with Java 1.5 ]$ cd seed-basic-rc1 ]$ forrest war ]$ cp build/my-project.war $CATALINA_HOME/webapps ]$ $CATALINA_HOME/bin/startup.sh Yes, it works. However, i am having trouble with the war from seed-sample and from site-author. -David
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
Tim Williams wrote: It seems that we forgot to update our Jetty version and it's *really* old. It's not technically a blocker and we wouldn't recommend a production deployment using our embedded Jetty anyway, but it's embarrassingly old. I don't know what's involved in updating it but it shouldn't be that difficult. Anyway, I could go either way on this one. There are various things that we should have upgraded, e.g. Ant. Yeah it would be great to have upgraded Jetty. I did try at various stages, but cannot remember why i was not successful. The old one works at the moment, good on it. If someone manages to get it upgraded, and if we need a new RC for other reasons then i reckon that we should include it. Otherwise IMO do a new release for 0.10 soon after, to update various supporting products. -David
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
Basic tests work for me on Linux with both Sun Java 5 and OpenJDK 6. -Brian
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
Lots of people still embed antique copies of Jetty. They have this annoying tendency to just work. On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Brian M Dube bd...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:41:53PM +1100, David Crossley wrote: Tim Williams wrote: It seems that we forgot to update our Jetty version and it's *really* old. It's not technically a blocker and we wouldn't recommend a production deployment using our embedded Jetty anyway, but it's embarrassingly old. I don't know what's involved in updating it but it shouldn't be that difficult. Anyway, I could go either way on this one. There are various things that we should have upgraded, e.g. Ant. Yeah it would be great to have upgraded Jetty. I did try at various stages, but cannot remember why i was not successful. Launching Jetty is done differently in current versions. Our configuration file would also need to be redone. I'm working on this now. The old one works at the moment, good on it. If someone manages to get it upgraded, and if we need a new RC for other reasons then i reckon that we should include it. Otherwise IMO do a new release for 0.10 soon after, to update various supporting products. -David
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
As seen with http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1066728 and 1066729 we had made a tiny mistake with the trademark footer. IMO it would not cause another RC. Anyway, if we do want to then it is fixed now. -David
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
The basic tests are okay for me on an independent up-to-date Mac. The forrestbot on our zone server (Java 6) shows that the changeover in trunk did well. Also not any concern from Gump. -David
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
+1 ea58a078e3861d4dfc8bf3296a53a5f8 apache-forrest-0.9.tar.gz Details bryce@xubuntu-q:~/Downloads$ uname -a Linux xubuntu-q 2.6.35-25-generic #44-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 21 17:40:48 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux bryce@xubuntu-q:~/Downloads$ md5sum apache-forrest-0.9.tar.gz ea58a078e3861d4dfc8bf3296a53a5f8 apache-forrest-0.9.tar.gz bryce@xubuntu-q:~/Downloads$ java -version java version 1.6.0_22 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_22-b04) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 17.1-b03, mixed mode, sharing) On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:47 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: We need people to review the release candidate and to test it on your projects, especially on different operating systems and Java version. See testing hints below. Download the release candidate and supporting files: http://people.apache.org/~crossley/temp/forrest-09-rc1/ For Windows get *.zip (md5sum c04600e8befeaf005d5e4b9d6c8034f9) For UNIX get *.tar.gz (md5sum ea58a078e3861d4dfc8bf3296a53a5f8) Get the *.asc and *.md5 that match your chosen download. Java 1.5 or later is required. Testing and vote period concludes Monday 2011-02-07 at 22:00 UTC [2]. Anyone can test and vote, not just PMC members. However only the PMC votes are binding [3]. When voting, quote the md5sum to ensure that we are all using the correct final release candidate package. The votes need to happen against the final source release package. If we need to build another release candidate, due to necessary changes to the code or documentation [1], then we need to vote reagarding that package. PMC members need to satisfy themselves that the actual final release package meets the ASF principles. During this week we do need to hear about both successes and failures. Please report your operating system and Java versions and Jetty/Tomcat versions. So we have approximately 6 days. Here are some hints for actual testing: * Verify the release, especially if you are a committer. Follow: http://forrest.apache.org/mirrors.cgi#verify * Ensure that the compressed archive will unpack properly. * Follow the README.txt and index.html * Set $FORREST_HOME and $PATH appropriately. * Try it with different Java versions. * Try it with different versions of Apache Tomcat or Jetty. * Many known issues are already recorded at our Jira. * Don't worry too much about minor bugs. We are looking for blockers, such as it will not run. * Please add other discovered issues to Jira. * Make a fresh site ... cd my-new-dir forrest seed-sample forrest run ... use the local jetty server. forrest ... build the whole site from the command-line. forrest war ... use your own full Jetty or Tomcat. * Try it on the Forrest core docs ... cd site-author forrest run forrest * Forrest was already pre-built. Try building it again. cd main build clean build build test-sample * Try it on your own project, especially if you have a project sitemap and use some extra plugins. * If you are a user of forrestbot then try that. * Try building and installing the forrestbar. -- [1] create final release candidate if necessary Saturday 2011-02-05 at 22:00 UTC http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=5month=2year=2011hour=22min=0sec=0p1=0 [2] end of vote on final release candidate and commence the upload phase Monday 2011-02-07 at 22:00 UTC (i.e. planned release date) http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=7month=2year=2011hour=22min=0sec=0p1=0 [3] Guidelines for Voting A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. http://forrest.apache.org/guidelines.html#actions http://forrest.apache.org/guidelines.html#voting -- ++ || | linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brycealcock | | Website: http://brycealcock.com | | Blog: http://quantprinciple.blogspot.com | | twitter: qboiler | || ++
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
Bryce Alcock wrote: +1 Many thanks Bryce, that is very helpful. Hey the motivational quotes on your home page are great. I wonder if you are the first to publish a site with 0.9 Thanks again. -David
