Re: Upgrading Batik

2013-10-18 Thread David Crossley
Brian M Dube wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:44:13PM +1100, David Crossley wrote:
  Brian M Dube wrote:
   The Jing discussion reminded me of upgrading Batik. We currently
   package batik-all-1.6.jar. Batik 1.7 does not ship an -all jar. Did
   Cocoon or Forrest build a custom jar out of the modules that Batik
   ships?
  
  Forrest would have obtained that as-is from Cocoon
  at the time of an etc/cocoon_upgrade process.
  
  The svn log over in the Cocoon branch shows that it was
  Antonio (2005-05-23) who commited it there. This gave me some
  search clues and so found this around our 0.6 release:
  
  http://s.apache.org/qx8
  Subject: Re: REsizing batik to a minimum for us.
  Date: May 27, 2004
  
  -David
 
 I see. Thanks.
 
 Creating a batik-all-1.7.jar and copying it to forrest/lib/core in
 place of 1.6 causes problems which I'm having trouble diagnosing. I've
 also tried rebuilding the cocoon-batik-block against Batik 1.7, and it
 didn't help.
 
 I'll try a few more things, but this update may not make it into the
 release. Help is welcome.

See issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1221
and our packaged Batik was upgraded as part of upgrading our Cocoon
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1240

-David


Re: Upgrading Batik

2011-01-09 Thread Brian M Dube
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:44:13PM +1100, David Crossley wrote:
 Brian M Dube wrote:
  The Jing discussion reminded me of upgrading Batik. We currently
  package batik-all-1.6.jar. Batik 1.7 does not ship an -all jar. Did
  Cocoon or Forrest build a custom jar out of the modules that Batik
  ships?
 
 Forrest would have obtained that as-is from Cocoon
 at the time of an etc/cocoon_upgrade process.
 
 The svn log over in the Cocoon branch shows that it was
 Antonio (2005-05-23) who commited it there. This gave me some
 search clues and so found this around our 0.6 release:
 
 http://s.apache.org/qx8
 Subject: Re: REsizing batik to a minimum for us.
 Date: May 27, 2004
 
 -David

I see. Thanks.

Creating a batik-all-1.7.jar and copying it to forrest/lib/core in
place of 1.6 causes problems which I'm having trouble diagnosing. I've
also tried rebuilding the cocoon-batik-block against Batik 1.7, and it
didn't help.

I'll try a few more things, but this update may not make it into the
release. Help is welcome.

-Brian


Upgrading Batik

2011-01-07 Thread Brian M Dube
The Jing discussion reminded me of upgrading Batik. We currently
package batik-all-1.6.jar. Batik 1.7 does not ship an -all jar. Did
Cocoon or Forrest build a custom jar out of the modules that Batik
ships?

-Brian


Re: Upgrading Batik

2011-01-07 Thread David Crossley
Brian M Dube wrote:
 The Jing discussion reminded me of upgrading Batik. We currently
 package batik-all-1.6.jar. Batik 1.7 does not ship an -all jar. Did
 Cocoon or Forrest build a custom jar out of the modules that Batik
 ships?

Forrest would have obtained that as-is from Cocoon
at the time of an etc/cocoon_upgrade process.

The svn log over in the Cocoon branch shows that it was
Antonio (2005-05-23) who commited it there. This gave me some
search clues and so found this around our 0.6 release:

http://s.apache.org/qx8
Subject: Re: REsizing batik to a minimum for us.
Date: May 27, 2004

-David