Friday, February 9, 2018, 2:07:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Le 08/02/2018 à 22:30, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>> Monday, February 5, 2018, 9:38:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> Le 04/02/2018 à 10:08, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
> BTW is Freemarker providing a RAT report?
`ant rat` generates one locally. It contains quite a few false alarms,
but I have only used it for manual checking. It's not published
anywhere.
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> You can remove false alarms using a rat-excludes.txt placed in the root.
>> That's undocumented, or at least I can't find it in the documentation
>> of Rat. Despite that, I have tried it with the latest stable (0.12,
>> from 07-Jun-2016... suspicious), but it had no effect. So for now it
>> will be Ant's good old fileset excludes.
> That's also a good solution for now indeed
>
> Jacques
I have externalized them to a "rat-excludes" file (purely using Ant
fileset fatures). Now we have no more false alarms. I have also
excluded archives and binaries, so checking if we have new problematic
files will be easy, as everything but Standards and Notes must be 0 in
the report. (I have also updated
https://freemarker.apache.org/committer-howto.html#making-releases
point 6 accordingly.)
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
