Re: [FM3] Dropping support before Servlet 2.5 / JSP 2.1. Or even before 3.0/2.2?

2017-01-21 Thread Christoph Rüger 
+1

Am 20.01.2017 4:26 nachm. schrieb "Daniel Dekany" :

> In FM3, I want to get rid of JSP 2.0 support. It needlessly
> complicates the build (because we also have to support the new methods
> in JSP 2.1). Then our minimum requirement will be still Servet 2.5,
> JSP 2.1, which was part of Java EE 5 (May 11, 2006). So I trust that
> nobody will want to stop me doing this.
>
> We might even want to require Servlet 3.0 and JSP 2.2, from Java EE 6
> (December 10, 2009), just to make things easier in the future, though
> at the moment we don't utilize that.
>
> --
> Thanks,
>  Daniel Dekany
>
>

-- 
Synesty GmbH
Moritz-von-Rohr-Str. 1a
07745 Jena
Tel.: +49 3641 559649
Fax.: +49 3641 5596499
Internet: http://synesty.com

Geschäftsführer: Christoph Rüger
Unternehmenssitz: Jena
Handelsregister B beim Amtsgericht: Jena
Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 508766
Ust-IdNr.: DE287564982

Re: [FM3] Dropping support before Servlet 2.5 / JSP 2.1. Or even before 3.0/2.2?

2017-01-20 Thread David E Jones 
On Jan 20 2017, at 7:26 am, Daniel Dekany  wrote:  

> We might even want to require Servlet 3.0 and JSP 2.2, from Java EE 6  

>

> (December 10, 2009), just to make things easier in the future, though  
at the moment we don't utilize that.

  

This seems very reasonable. It goes back quite a few years and is one version
back from the current version (JEE 7, Servlet 3.1, JSP 2.3; looks like since
June 2013).

  

-David

Re: [FM3] Dropping support before Servlet 2.5 / JSP 2.1. Or even before 3.0/2.2?

2017-01-20 Thread Barrie Selack 
I'd vote to start at Servlet 3.0 and JSP 2.2

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:

> In FM3, I want to get rid of JSP 2.0 support. It needlessly
> complicates the build (because we also have to support the new methods
> in JSP 2.1). Then our minimum requirement will be still Servet 2.5,
> JSP 2.1, which was part of Java EE 5 (May 11, 2006). So I trust that
> nobody will want to stop me doing this.
>
> We might even want to require Servlet 3.0 and JSP 2.2, from Java EE 6
> (December 10, 2009), just to make things easier in the future, though
> at the moment we don't utilize that.
>
> --
> Thanks,
>  Daniel Dekany
>
>