Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

[Kirys]

On 19/01/2017 13:30, Daniel Dekany wrote:

A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
if you have maintained FM... <-; ).

#1.5

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

[David E Jones]

  
I still like #3 on the top row... simple, and square is nice on certain sites
(ie certain sites require a square logo).  

  

-David

  

![](https://link.nylas.com/open/5xm8m568zhx9qyloglsg31huz/local-30aff82b-
1fd7?r=ZGV2QGZyZWVtYXJrZXIuaW5jdWJhdG9yLmFwYWNoZS5vcmc=)

  
On Jan 19 2017, at 4:30 am, Daniel Dekany  wrote:  

> A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a  
new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,  
changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling  
if you have maintained FM... <-; ).

>

> I change my vote to +1 for #1.5.

>

>  
Monday, January 16, 2017, 11:07:29 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:

>

> > Hello,  
>  
> I prefer #1.  
>  
> But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments  
> (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer  
> #1.5 ;)  
>  
> Regards,  
>  
> Julien.  
>  
>  
> On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:  
>> We will replace our square logo at Twitter  
>> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo  
>> in the future elsewhere too.  
>>  
>> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?  
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c  
>>  
>> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them  
>> anywhere.)  
>>  
>> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!  
>>  
>  
>

>

> \--  
Thanks,  
 Daniel Dekany

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

[Jacques Le Roux]

OK, I focused, and I still prefer 2 with its (very hard to see) paler shadow

Jacques


Le 19/01/2017 à 18:47, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

Sincerely I don't see the differences between 1.5 and 2.

Disclaimer: I'm a bit daltonian

Jacques


Le 19/01/2017 à 13:30, Daniel Dekany a écrit :

A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
if you have maintained FM... <-; ).

I change my vote to +1 for #1.5.


Monday, January 16, 2017, 11:07:29 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:


Hello,

I prefer #1.

But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments
(https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer
#1.5 ;)

Regards,

Julien.


On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:

We will replace our square logo at Twitter
(https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
in the future elsewhere too.

Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c

(The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
anywhere.)

Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

[Jacques Le Roux]

Sincerely I don't see the differences between 1.5 and 2.

Disclaimer: I'm a bit daltonian

Jacques


Le 19/01/2017 à 13:30, Daniel Dekany a écrit :

A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
if you have maintained FM... <-; ).

I change my vote to +1 for #1.5.


Monday, January 16, 2017, 11:07:29 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:


Hello,

I prefer #1.

But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments
(https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer
#1.5 ;)

Regards,

Julien.


On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:

We will replace our square logo at Twitter
(https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
in the future elsewhere too.

Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c

(The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
anywhere.)

Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

[Christoph Rüger]

+1 for 1.5

Am 19.01.2017 6:19 nachm. schrieb "Jacopo Cappellato" <
jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com>:

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Dekany 
> wrote:
>
> > A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
> > new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
> > changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
> > if you have maintained FM... <-; ).
> >
>
> :-)
>
>
> >
> > I change my vote to +1 for #1.5.
> >
>
> I am also going to change my vote with a +1 for #1.5
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> >
> >
> > Monday, January 16, 2017, 11:07:29 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I prefer #1.
> > >
> > > But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments
> > > (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I
> prefer
> > > #1.5 ;)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Julien.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> > >> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> > >> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> > >> in the future elsewhere too.
> > >>
> > >> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> > >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
> > >>
> > >> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> > >> anywhere.)
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> >  Daniel Dekany
> >
> >
>

-- 
Synesty GmbH
Moritz-von-Rohr-Str. 1a
07745 Jena
Tel.: +49 3641 559649
Fax.: +49 3641 5596499
Internet: http://synesty.com

Geschäftsführer: Christoph Rüger
Unternehmenssitz: Jena
Handelsregister B beim Amtsgericht: Jena
Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 508766
Ust-IdNr.: DE287564982

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

[Jacopo Cappellato]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:

> A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
> new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
> changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
> if you have maintained FM... <-; ).
>

:-)


>
> I change my vote to +1 for #1.5.
>

I am also going to change my vote with a +1 for #1.5

Jacopo


>
>
> Monday, January 16, 2017, 11:07:29 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I prefer #1.
> >
> > But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments
> > (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer
> > #1.5 ;)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Julien.
> >
> >
> > On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> >> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> >> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> >> in the future elsewhere too.
> >>
> >> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
> >>
> >> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> >> anywhere.)
> >>
> >> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Thanks,
>  Daniel Dekany
>
>