Re: [PROPOSAL]: Improve OQL Method Invocation Security
Hello Mike, Agreed, we'll probably need to create an enhancement request for this feature in JIRA. Cheers. On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 5:37 PM Michael Stolz wrote: > One thing I will mention regarding DATA:READ:RegionName allowing query > behavior is that we have been asked by some users already to separate > DATA:READ:RegionName from DATA:QUERY:RegionName. This request is to protect > against arbitrary query execution by administrators that can cause huge > resource consumption. > > So regardless of all the rest of the proposal, that's something we should > probably consider standardizing on. > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engineer, Pivotal Cloud Cache > Mobile: +1-631-835-4771 > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:36 AM Juan José Ramos > wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > Friendly reminder regarding the deadline to rise concerns and/or > objections > > regarding the *OQL Method InvocationSecurity Proposal [1]*, I'll go ahead > > and move it to *Development* on July 13th. > > Best regards. > > > > [1]: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/OQL+Method+Invocation+Security#OQLMethodInvocationSecurity-PriorArt > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:29 PM Juan José Ramos > wrote: > > > > > Done [1]!. > > > Please remember that, if no major concerns arise before Friday this > week, > > > I'll go ahead and move the proposal to *Development* on July 13th. > > > Best regards. > > > > > > [1]: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/OQL+Method+Invocation+Security#OQLMethodInvocationSecurity-PriorArt > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 3:48 PM Jacob Barrett > > wrote: > > > > > >> Can you please add a Prior Art section to your proposal discussing > these > > >> alternative solutions and why they are insufficient? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Jake > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Jul 5, 2019, at 10:41 AM, Juan José Ramos > > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Hello Jake, > > >> > > > >> > I've replied something similar *here [1]*. > > >> > Long story short, I haven't found anything that really applies to > our > > >> use > > >> > case. The "most similar solution" is *Spring Method Security [2]*, > > which > > >> > basically implies annotating methods with explicit configuration > about > > >> the > > >> > roles required to execute them. The same goes for *Shiro > > >> **Annotation-based > > >> > Authorization [3]*. The *AnnotationBasedMethodAuthorize**r [3]* > > approach > > >> > from the proposal is somewhat similar to this, but I've discarded it > > >> > because if forces the user to annotate classes with our own > > annotations, > > >> > basically forcing them to modify their domain model. > > >> > The proposal basically allows our users to use one of the default of > > the > > >> > box implementations and, if they don't like them for whatever > reason, > > is > > >> > flexible enough so they can ultimately provide their own. > > >> > Hope this helps. > > >> > Cheers. > > >> > > > >> > [1]: > > >> > > > >> > > > https://markmail.org/message/ekons7ixtz4jtf7n#query:+page:1+mid:snxgpsqd3yuppmsc+state:results > > >> > [2]: > > >> > > > >> > > > https://docs.spring.io/spring-security/site/docs/5.1.5.RELEASE/reference/html/jc.html#jc-method > > >> > [3]: > > >> > > > >> > > > https://shiro.apache.org/authorization.html#Authorization-AnnotationbasedAuthorization > > >> > [4]: > > >> > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/OQL+Method+Invocation+Security#OQLMethodInvocationSecurity-AnnotationBasedMethodAuthorizer > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 1:46 PM Jacob Barrett > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> So if we don’t want to use the Java built in SecurityManager to > solve > > >> >> this, because we feel it's too big or too inflexible for our needs, > > >> have > > >> >> other projects implemented something we can borrow? We can’t be the > > >> first > > >> >> to need something like this if Java’s solution isn’t a good fit. > > >> >> > > >> >> Again I want to avoid inventing something new. What prior art is > out > > >> there? > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >>> On Jul 4, 2019, at 1:29 PM, Juan José Ramos > > >> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Hello all, > > >> >>> > > >> >>> If you haven't added my email to the spam folder already :-), then > > I'd > > >> >> like > > >> >>> to let you know that I've update again the *Proposal [1]* and > > >> >> incorporated > > >> >>> most of the feedback provided, along with some additional > > information > > >> and > > >> >>> context I missed on the previous versions, thanks all that brought > > >> >> concerns > > >> >>> and suggestions to the discussion. Please take some time to review > > it > > >> >>> thoroughly, adding comments and/or concerns *only on this email > > >> thread*, > > >> >>> all feedback is more than welcome. > > >> >>> If no major concerns arise before July 12th 2019, I'll go ahead > and > > >> mark > > >> >>> move the proposal to *Development* on July 13th. > > >> >>> Best regards. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> [1]: > > >> >>>
Re: [PROPOSAL]: Improve OQL Method Invocation Security
+1 I just re-reviewed this proposal and it looks good to me. - Aaron > On Jul 12, 2019, at 6:29 AM, Juan José Ramos wrote: > > Hello Mike, > > Agreed, we'll probably need to create an enhancement request for this > feature in JIRA. > Cheers. > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 5:37 PM Michael Stolz wrote: > >> One thing I will mention regarding DATA:READ:RegionName allowing query >> behavior is that we have been asked by some users already to separate >> DATA:READ:RegionName from DATA:QUERY:RegionName. This request is to protect >> against arbitrary query execution by administrators that can cause huge >> resource consumption. >> >> So regardless of all the rest of the proposal, that's something we should >> probably consider standardizing on. >> >> -- >> Mike Stolz >> Principal Engineer, Pivotal Cloud Cache >> Mobile: +1-631-835-4771 >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:36 AM Juan José Ramos >> wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> Friendly reminder regarding the deadline to rise concerns and/or >> objections >>> regarding the *OQL Method InvocationSecurity Proposal [1]*, I'll go ahead >>> and move it to *Development* on July 13th. >>> Best regards. >>> >>> [1]: >>> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/OQL+Method+Invocation+Security#OQLMethodInvocationSecurity-PriorArt >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:29 PM Juan José Ramos >> wrote: >>> Done [1]!. Please remember that, if no major concerns arise before Friday this >> week, I'll go ahead and move the proposal to *Development* on July 13th. Best regards. [1]: >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/OQL+Method+Invocation+Security#OQLMethodInvocationSecurity-PriorArt On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 3:48 PM Jacob Barrett >>> wrote: > Can you please add a Prior Art section to your proposal discussing >> these > alternative solutions and why they are insufficient? > > Thanks, > Jake > > >> On Jul 5, 2019, at 10:41 AM, Juan José Ramos >>> wrote: >> >> Hello Jake, >> >> I've replied something similar *here [1]*. >> Long story short, I haven't found anything that really applies to >> our > use >> case. The "most similar solution" is *Spring Method Security [2]*, >>> which >> basically implies annotating methods with explicit configuration >> about > the >> roles required to execute them. The same goes for *Shiro > **Annotation-based >> Authorization [3]*. The *AnnotationBasedMethodAuthorize**r [3]* >>> approach >> from the proposal is somewhat similar to this, but I've discarded it >> because if forces the user to annotate classes with our own >>> annotations, >> basically forcing them to modify their domain model. >> The proposal basically allows our users to use one of the default of >>> the >> box implementations and, if they don't like them for whatever >> reason, >>> is >> flexible enough so they can ultimately provide their own. >> Hope this helps. >> Cheers. >> >> [1]: >> > >>> >> https://markmail.org/message/ekons7ixtz4jtf7n#query:+page:1+mid:snxgpsqd3yuppmsc+state:results >> [2]: >> > >>> >> https://docs.spring.io/spring-security/site/docs/5.1.5.RELEASE/reference/html/jc.html#jc-method >> [3]: >> > >>> >> https://shiro.apache.org/authorization.html#Authorization-AnnotationbasedAuthorization >> [4]: >> > >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/OQL+Method+Invocation+Security#OQLMethodInvocationSecurity-AnnotationBasedMethodAuthorizer >> >> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 1:46 PM Jacob Barrett > wrote: >> >>> So if we don’t want to use the Java built in SecurityManager to >> solve >>> this, because we feel it's too big or too inflexible for our needs, > have >>> other projects implemented something we can borrow? We can’t be the > first >>> to need something like this if Java’s solution isn’t a good fit. >>> >>> Again I want to avoid inventing something new. What prior art is >> out > there? >>> >>> On Jul 4, 2019, at 1:29 PM, Juan José Ramos > wrote: Hello all, If you haven't added my email to the spam folder already :-), then >>> I'd >>> like to let you know that I've update again the *Proposal [1]* and >>> incorporated most of the feedback provided, along with some additional >>> information > and context I missed on the previous versions, thanks all that brought >>> concerns and suggestions to the discussion. Please take some time to review >>> it thoroughly, adding comments and/or concerns *only on this email > thread*, all feedback is more than welcome. If no major concerns arise before July 12th 2019, I'll go ahead >> and > mark move the proposal to *Devel
Re: some pages in the wiki may be not on the right place
seems no disagree response( and no agree response), I am planning to do this. Thanks Gang Yan（闫钢） On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:06 PM Gang Yan wrote: > Hi Geode Dev > > updated table, to add 4 sub pages: > > original title original page traslated title translated page status last > updated > Replacing JGroups 2.2.9 > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Replacing+JGroups+2.2.9 替换 > JGroups 2.2.9 > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146172 > unfinished > translated last modified on Jul 16, 2016 > 关于 Geode > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146511 > translated > topic last modified on Jul 17, 2016 > Developing Applications for Geode > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Developing+Applications+for+Geode > 应用开发 > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146968 > unfinished > translated, outdated last modified on Jul 22, 2016 > Design https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Design 设计 > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146976 > translated > topic last modified on Jul 30, 2016 > Index https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Index 概览 > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146019 > translated, > outdated last modified on Oct 28, 2016 > Project Proposals and Specifications > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications > 工程草案和规范 > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146488 > translated > topic, only 3 topics last modified on Jul 16, 2016 > Geode Redis Adapter Proposal > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Redis+Adapter+Proposal > Geode > Redis Adaptor适配器 > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146495 > translated last modified on Jul 16, 2016 > OQL Aggregate functions and UDA > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/OQL+Aggregate+functions+and+UDA > OQL > 聚集函数和 UDA > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65148037 > translated last modified on Jul 30, 2016 > Automated Rebalancing > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Automated+Rebalancing > 自动重平衡 > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146493 just > translated the title Created on Jul 16, 2016 > Geode Security Framework > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Security+Framework > Geode > 安全框架 > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65148044 > translated last modified on Jul 30, 2016 > Moving from memcached to gemcached > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Moving+from+memcached+to+gemcached > 从 > memcached 迁移到 gemcached > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65148029 > translated last modified on Jul 30, 2016 > Network Configuration Best Practices > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Network+Configuration+Best+Practices > 网络配置最佳实践 > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146974 > translated last modified on Jul 26, 2016 > Roadmap https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Roadmap 技术路线 > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146514 > translated last modified on Jul 16, 2016 > > > > thanks > > Gang Yan（闫钢） > > > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:42 AM Gang Yan wrote: > >> Hi Geode Dev >> >> some pages in wiki , are just a translation not a proposal. >> >> the pages are listed as follows, please focus on the column of "status" >> and "last updated": >> original title original page traslated title translated page status last >> updated >> Replacing JGroups 2.2.9 >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Replacing+JGroups+2.2.9 替换 >> JGroups 2.2.9 >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146172 >> unfinished >> translated last modified on Jul 16, 2016 >> 关于 Geode >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146511 >> translated >> topic last modified on Jul 17, 2016 >> Developing Applications for Geode >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Developing+Applications+for+Geode >> 应用开发 >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146968 >> unfinished >> translated, outdated last modified on Jul 22, 2016 >> Design https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Design 设计 >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146976 >> translated >> topic last modified on Jul 30, 2016 >> Index https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Index 概览 >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146019 >> translated, >> outdated last modified on Oct 28, 2016 >> Project Proposals and Specifications >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications >> 工程草案和规范 >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewp
Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweight RFC Process
Following up on this, I took a stab at organizing our old proposals into the buckets on the wiki. We now have: Under Discussion - Draft and In Discussion proposals In Development - proposals under active development Active - Proposals that are completely implemented Dropped - Proposals that were not approved or development stalled out. If I moved your proposal to "Dropped" erroneously, please feel free to move it back! I moved things there that did not appear to have been implemented or have any recent activity. I put a few things in "Unknown State." If you know what state these proposals are in, please move them! https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:20 AM Alexander Murmann wrote: > Given discussion here and previous discussion on the PR, I consider this > proposal approved and updated its state accordingly. > > I also incorporated Dan's suggestion of moving deprecated proposals and > added a reference to the new process at the top of the Project Proposals > and Specifications page > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications > > > . > > Thank you all for you great feedback throughout this process! > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:07 AM Dan Smith wrote: > > > > > > > Will moving the page around on the wiki result in dead links to the > draft > > > version? > > > > > > > No. If you use the share button in the wiki, you get a permanent link to > > the page. Even if you just copy the URL from the address bar it doesn't > > include the folder the page is in. > > > > -Dan > > > > > -- > Alexander J. Murmann > (650) 283-1933 >
Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweight RFC Process
Thanks for taking the initiative Dan! > On Jul 12, 2019, at 12:57 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > Following up on this, I took a stab at organizing our old proposals into > the buckets on the wiki. We now have: > > Under Discussion - Draft and In Discussion proposals > In Development - proposals under active development > Active - Proposals that are completely implemented > Dropped - Proposals that were not approved or development stalled out. > > If I moved your proposal to "Dropped" erroneously, please feel free to move > it back! I moved things there that did not appear to have been implemented > or have any recent activity. > > I put a few things in "Unknown State." If you know what state these > proposals are in, please move them! > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:20 AM Alexander Murmann > wrote: > >> Given discussion here and previous discussion on the PR, I consider this >> proposal approved and updated its state accordingly. >> >> I also incorporated Dan's suggestion of moving deprecated proposals and >> added a reference to the new process at the top of the Project Proposals >> and Specifications page >> < >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications >>> >> . >> >> Thank you all for you great feedback throughout this process! >> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:07 AM Dan Smith wrote: >> Will moving the page around on the wiki result in dead links to the >> draft version? >>> >>> No. If you use the share button in the wiki, you get a permanent link to >>> the page. Even if you just copy the URL from the address bar it doesn't >>> include the folder the page is in. >>> >>> -Dan >>> >> >> >> -- >> Alexander J. Murmann >> (650) 283-1933 >>
Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweight RFC Process
Thanks, Dan! On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 1:35 PM Mark Hanson wrote: > Thanks for taking the initiative Dan! > > > On Jul 12, 2019, at 12:57 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > > > Following up on this, I took a stab at organizing our old proposals into > > the buckets on the wiki. We now have: > > > > Under Discussion - Draft and In Discussion proposals > > In Development - proposals under active development > > Active - Proposals that are completely implemented > > Dropped - Proposals that were not approved or development stalled out. > > > > If I moved your proposal to "Dropped" erroneously, please feel free to > move > > it back! I moved things there that did not appear to have been > implemented > > or have any recent activity. > > > > I put a few things in "Unknown State." If you know what state these > > proposals are in, please move them! > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications > > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:20 AM Alexander Murmann > > wrote: > > > >> Given discussion here and previous discussion on the PR, I consider this > >> proposal approved and updated its state accordingly. > >> > >> I also incorporated Dan's suggestion of moving deprecated proposals and > >> added a reference to the new process at the top of the Project Proposals > >> and Specifications page > >> < > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications > >>> > >> . > >> > >> Thank you all for you great feedback throughout this process! > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:07 AM Dan Smith wrote: > >> > > Will moving the page around on the wiki result in dead links to the > >> draft > version? > > >>> > >>> No. If you use the share button in the wiki, you get a permanent link > to > >>> the page. Even if you just copy the URL from the address bar it doesn't > >>> include the folder the page is in. > >>> > >>> -Dan > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Alexander J. Murmann > >> (650) 283-1933 > >> > >
Re: some pages in the wiki may be not on the right place
+1 -Dan On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:44 AM Gang Yan wrote: > seems no disagree response( and no agree response), I am planning to do > this. > > Thanks > > Gang Yan（闫钢） > > > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:06 PM Gang Yan wrote: > > > Hi Geode Dev > > > > updated table, to add 4 sub pages: > > > > original title original page traslated title translated page status last > > updated > > Replacing JGroups 2.2.9 > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Replacing+JGroups+2.2.9 > 替换 > > JGroups 2.2.9 > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146172 > unfinished > > translated last modified on Jul 16, 2016 > > 关于 Geode > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146511 > translated > > topic last modified on Jul 17, 2016 > > Developing Applications for Geode > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Developing+Applications+for+Geode > > 应用开发 > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146968 > unfinished > > translated, outdated last modified on Jul 22, 2016 > > Design https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Design 设计 > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146976 > translated > > topic last modified on Jul 30, 2016 > > Index https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Index 概览 > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146019 > translated, > > outdated last modified on Oct 28, 2016 > > Project Proposals and Specifications > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications > > 工程草案和规范 > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146488 > translated > > topic, only 3 topics last modified on Jul 16, 2016 > > Geode Redis Adapter Proposal > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Redis+Adapter+Proposal > Geode > > Redis Adaptor适配器 > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146495 > > translated last modified on Jul 16, 2016 > > OQL Aggregate functions and UDA > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/OQL+Aggregate+functions+and+UDA > OQL > > 聚集函数和 UDA > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65148037 > > translated last modified on Jul 30, 2016 > > Automated Rebalancing > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Automated+Rebalancing > > 自动重平衡 > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146493 > just > > translated the title Created on Jul 16, 2016 > > Geode Security Framework > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Security+Framework > Geode > > 安全框架 > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65148044 > > translated last modified on Jul 30, 2016 > > Moving from memcached to gemcached > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Moving+from+memcached+to+gemcached > 从 > > memcached 迁移到 gemcached > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65148029 > > translated last modified on Jul 30, 2016 > > Network Configuration Best Practices > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Network+Configuration+Best+Practices > > 网络配置最佳实践 > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146974 > > translated last modified on Jul 26, 2016 > > Roadmap https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Roadmap 技术路线 > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146514 > > translated last modified on Jul 16, 2016 > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > Gang Yan（闫钢） > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:42 AM Gang Yan wrote: > > > >> Hi Geode Dev > >> > >> some pages in wiki , are just a translation not a proposal. > >> > >> the pages are listed as follows, please focus on the column of "status" > >> and "last updated": > >> original title original page traslated title translated page status last > >> updated > >> Replacing JGroups 2.2.9 > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Replacing+JGroups+2.2.9 > 替换 > >> JGroups 2.2.9 > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146172 > unfinished > >> translated last modified on Jul 16, 2016 > >> 关于 Geode > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146511 > translated > >> topic last modified on Jul 17, 2016 > >> Developing Applications for Geode > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Developing+Applications+for+Geode > >> 应用开发 > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146968 > unfinished > >> translated, outdated last modified on Jul 22, 2016 > >> Design https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Design 设计 > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65146976 > translated > >> topic last modified on Jul 30, 2016 > >> Index https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Index 概览 > >> > http
Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweight RFC Process
This is great! Thanks! - Aaron > On Jul 12, 2019, at 1:43 PM, Alexander Murmann wrote: > > Thanks, Dan! > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 1:35 PM Mark Hanson wrote: > >> Thanks for taking the initiative Dan! >> >>> On Jul 12, 2019, at 12:57 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >>> >>> Following up on this, I took a stab at organizing our old proposals into >>> the buckets on the wiki. We now have: >>> >>> Under Discussion - Draft and In Discussion proposals >>> In Development - proposals under active development >>> Active - Proposals that are completely implemented >>> Dropped - Proposals that were not approved or development stalled out. >>> >>> If I moved your proposal to "Dropped" erroneously, please feel free to >> move >>> it back! I moved things there that did not appear to have been >> implemented >>> or have any recent activity. >>> >>> I put a few things in "Unknown State." If you know what state these >>> proposals are in, please move them! >>> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:20 AM Alexander Murmann >>> wrote: >>> Given discussion here and previous discussion on the PR, I consider this proposal approved and updated its state accordingly. I also incorporated Dan's suggestion of moving deprecated proposals and added a reference to the new process at the top of the Project Proposals and Specifications page < >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications > . Thank you all for you great feedback throughout this process! On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:07 AM Dan Smith wrote: >> >> Will moving the page around on the wiki result in dead links to the draft >> version? >> > > No. If you use the share button in the wiki, you get a permanent link >> to > the page. Even if you just copy the URL from the address bar it doesn't > include the folder the page is in. > > -Dan > -- Alexander J. Murmann (650) 283-1933 >> >>
