Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8958 into 1.14.x, 1.13.x, 1.12.x branches

2021-03-03 Thread Kirk Lund 
+1

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:51 AM Jianxia Chen  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:44 AM Darrel Schneider  wrote:
>
> > +1
> > 
> > From: Xiaojian Zhou 
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 9:43 AM
> > To: dev@geode.apache.org 
> > Subject: Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8958 into 1.14.x, 1.13.x, 1.12.x
> > branches
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 3/1/21, 11:30 PM, "Owen Nichols"  wrote:
> >
> > That sounds a lot better than never expiring them if that does
> happen,
> > I think this would be good to include.
> >
> > On 3/1/21, 2:41 PM, "Mark Hanson"  wrote:
> >
> > I would like to backport GEODE-8958 into previous release
> branches
> > to alleviate a problem with tombstones if timestamps become corrupt for
> > some reason.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8958 into 1.14.x, 1.13.x, 1.12.x branches

2021-03-03 Thread Jianxia Chen 
+1

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:44 AM Darrel Schneider  wrote:

> +1
> 
> From: Xiaojian Zhou 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 9:43 AM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8958 into 1.14.x, 1.13.x, 1.12.x
> branches
>
> +1
>
> On 3/1/21, 11:30 PM, "Owen Nichols"  wrote:
>
> That sounds a lot better than never expiring them if that does happen,
> I think this would be good to include.
>
> On 3/1/21, 2:41 PM, "Mark Hanson"  wrote:
>
> I would like to backport GEODE-8958 into previous release branches
> to alleviate a problem with tombstones if timestamps become corrupt for
> some reason.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
>
>

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8958 into 1.14.x, 1.13.x, 1.12.x branches

2021-03-03 Thread Darrel Schneider 
+1

From: Xiaojian Zhou 
Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 9:43 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8958 into 1.14.x, 1.13.x, 1.12.x branches

+1

On 3/1/21, 11:30 PM, "Owen Nichols"  wrote:

That sounds a lot better than never expiring them if that does happen, I 
think this would be good to include.

On 3/1/21, 2:41 PM, "Mark Hanson"  wrote:

I would like to backport GEODE-8958 into previous release branches to 
alleviate a problem with tombstones if timestamps become corrupt for some 
reason.

Thanks,
Mark

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8958 into 1.14.x, 1.13.x, 1.12.x branches

2021-03-03 Thread Xiaojian Zhou 
+1

On 3/1/21, 11:30 PM, "Owen Nichols"  wrote:

That sounds a lot better than never expiring them if that does happen, I 
think this would be good to include.

On 3/1/21, 2:41 PM, "Mark Hanson"  wrote:

I would like to backport GEODE-8958 into previous release branches to 
alleviate a problem with tombstones if timestamps become corrupt for some 
reason.

Thanks,
Mark

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8958 into 1.14.x, 1.13.x, 1.12.x branches

2021-03-01 Thread Owen Nichols 
That sounds a lot better than never expiring them if that does happen, I think 
this would be good to include.

On 3/1/21, 2:41 PM, "Mark Hanson"  wrote:

I would like to backport GEODE-8958 into previous release branches to 
alleviate a problem with tombstones if timestamps become corrupt for some 
reason.

Thanks,
Mark

[Proposal] Backport GEODE-8958 into 1.14.x, 1.13.x, 1.12.x branches

2021-03-01 Thread Mark Hanson 
I would like to backport GEODE-8958 into previous release branches to alleviate 
a problem with tombstones if timestamps become corrupt for some reason.

Thanks,
Mark