Re: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13
Hey, Bill, you got the votes. Go ahead with the back-ports. Thanks, Dave On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 10:54 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:59 AM Dick Cavender wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bruce Schuchardt > > Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 9:49 AM > > To: dev@geode.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13 > > > > +1 > > > > On 7/1/20, 9:43 AM, "Bill Burcham" wrote: > > > > I'd like permission to back-port the fix for rolling upgrade bug > > GEODE-8240 > > to support/1.12 and support/1.13 > > > > -Bill > > > > >
Re: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13
+1 On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:59 AM Dick Cavender wrote: > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: Bruce Schuchardt > Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 9:49 AM > To: dev@geode.apache.org > Subject: Re: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13 > > +1 > > On 7/1/20, 9:43 AM, "Bill Burcham" wrote: > > I'd like permission to back-port the fix for rolling upgrade bug > GEODE-8240 > to support/1.12 and support/1.13 > > -Bill > >
RE: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13
+1 -Original Message- From: Bruce Schuchardt Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 9:49 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13 +1 On 7/1/20, 9:43 AM, "Bill Burcham" wrote: I'd like permission to back-port the fix for rolling upgrade bug GEODE-8240 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 -Bill
Re: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13
+1 On 7/1/20, 9:43 AM, "Bill Burcham" wrote: I'd like permission to back-port the fix for rolling upgrade bug GEODE-8240 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 -Bill
Re: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13
I see this fix has been well-received on develop, and getting rolling upgrade right definitely sounds critical to me! +1 On 7/1/20, 9:43 AM, "Bill Burcham" wrote: I'd like permission to back-port the fix for rolling upgrade bug GEODE-8240 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 -Bill